The Effects of a Combination of Nootropic Ingredients on Cognition in Healthy Young Volunteers

NCT ID: NCT02857829

Last Updated: 2017-12-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-01

Study Completion Date

2017-03-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Achieving optimal concentration during cognitively demanding tasks is of immense human value. Despite our understanding of the important role that attention, working memory, and fluid intelligence play in professional success, and the huge individual differences in these constructs, the modulation of these cognitive domains has not been rigorously studied. From the widespread use of caffeine, to the more questionable and increasing use of prescription medications to achieve peak attention, the tremendous interest in achieving cognitive performance has driven individuals to experiment, often with prescription and illegal drugs. Herein, we aim to standardize and extend the study of attention modulating substances, to identify blends that achieve safe enhancements in attention and working memory. Specific to this proposal, we aim to develop CAF+, a blend of natural and generally regarded as safe compounds to improve attention and working memory in normal, healthy individuals. CAF+ is composed of caffeine (100 mg), L-theanine (200 mg), vinpocetine (40 mg), L-tyrosine (300 mg), pyridoxine (0.06 mg), and cobalamin (20 mg).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: There is still a great need to find treatments that can improve cognitive function in people that suffer from memory and attention problems, as well as healthy, young individuals. There are various natural ingredients that have been claimed to improve cognitive functions in humans (e.g., caffeine, L-theanine, vinpocetine). These ingredients have a different mechanism of action and are assumed to have a general effect on brain function. It is hypothesized that a combination of these natural ingredients may be more effective to improve cognitive performance. In this study we would like to test the cognition-enhancing potential of a mixture of different natural ingredients.

Objective: Examine the effects of a treatment that consists of different natural ingredients on cognitive performance in young healthy subjects. These effects will be compared with caffeine treatment, a natural ingredient that has been found to improve cognition in various studies.

Study design: This study will use a double-blind placebo controlled, cross-over design.

Study population: Twenty-one healthy subjects in the age range from 18-35 years will be included.

Intervention: The subjects will be tested three times. At each test session they will receive one capsule (Placebo, Caffeine, or CAF+).

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome measure is the number of recalled words in a verbal word learning task.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The subjects who will be included in the study will visit the testing site four times (medical screening + practice session, and three test sessions). Each testing session will last 2.5 h. In total the subjects will spent about 10 h when they participate. During the three test sessions the subjects will receive a capsule that contains a placebo, caffeine or a combination of different natural ingredients. These treatments are well tolerated. No adverse reactions of treatment are expected. The subjects have to abstain from drinking coffee and smoking the evening before the test days. The results of this study will reveal whether a combination of different natural ingredients is more effective than coffee to improve cognitive functions. In the light of a great demand for finding treatments that can be beneficial for old subjects suffering from age-related cognitive impairments, it is considered that the risks are minimal and there is a considerable potential benefit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biomedical Enhancement

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Cognition working memory nootropic reaction time healthy individuals cognitive enhancement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Rice flour

Caffeine-alone

The effects of the combination will be compared to both placebo and caffeine-alone, to test the hypothesis that the blend of ingredients will enhance cognitive measures greater than the most commonly used cognitive enhancer, caffeine.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Caffeine-alone

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Caffeine (100 mg)

CAF+

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CAF+

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

CAF+ will be a blend consisting of caffeine (100 mg), L-theanine (200 mg), vinpocetine (40 mg), L-tyrosine (300 mg), pyridoxine (1 mg), and cobalamin (20 mg).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CAF+

CAF+ will be a blend consisting of caffeine (100 mg), L-theanine (200 mg), vinpocetine (40 mg), L-tyrosine (300 mg), pyridoxine (1 mg), and cobalamin (20 mg).

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Caffeine-alone

Caffeine (100 mg)

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Placebo

Rice flour

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* BMI between 18.5-30
* Willing to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Suffer from or have a history of cardiac, hepatic, renal, pulmonary, neurological, gastrointestinal, haematological or psychiatric illness (Also those volunteers who have a first-degree relative with a psychiatric disorder or a history with a psychiatric disorder will be excluded)
* Alcohol consumption \>20 drinks/week
* pregnant or lactating
* use of medication of than oral contraceptives
* use of recreation drugs 2 weeks before until the end of the experiment
* any motor or sensory deficits which could reasonably be expected to affect test performance
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nootrobox, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Arjan Blokland, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University

Anke Sambeth, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maastricht University

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Nootrobox_Maastricht

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id