Evaluation of Pressure Applying Efficiency in Multi-Layer Bandaging

NCT ID: NCT02857621

Last Updated: 2017-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

37 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-04-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Lymphedema is a condition characterized by excess accumulation of protein rich tissue fluid in interstitial spaces. It is a progressive chronic disease and without appropriate management may result in serious complications. In Israel, patients are referred to physiotherapists certified in treatment for lymphedema. According to the International Society of Lymphology (ISL) the best treatment is a holistic, multidiscipline approach. Amongst the different methods of lymphedema management, the use of compression is the only treatment that has shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials.

The ISL recommends that patients with lymphedema in the lower limb ought to bandage their leg with multi-layer bandaging on a daily basis for a period of two to four weeks. A new classification system for compression bandages was recommended; pressure of \<20 mmHg was categorized as mild, 20-40 mmHg as medium, 40-60 mmHg as strong and ≥60 mmHg as very strong. In patients with leg edema, bandages with strong pressure were shown to be the most effective. However, in the presence of a venous ulcer on a lymphatic leg, pressure between 35 and 45 mmHg is the widely accepted range for sufficient and safe compression. The use of measurement instruments is currently the only realistic method for determining the actual pressure achieved beneath the bandage. However, it is neither economical nor feasib¬le nor is it realistic in terms of time.

Recent studies show that many healthcare professionals use inadequate sub-bandage pressure. No study so far has focused on therapists that are trained in lymphatic treatment. In spite of correct pressure bandaging importance, the question whether physiotherapists succeed in correctly applying it is left unanswered. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the pressure applying efficiency in multi-layer bandaging among physiotherapists in Israel who treat lymphedema.

34 physiotherapists trained in lymphatic treatment will be recruited for this research. Each volunteer will receive a questionnaire concerning their self-perceived competence in the application of compression bandages. Afterwards, two practical trials will be held a week apart in which the subjects will be asked to apply bandages using strong and medium pressure. Using PicoPress®, pressure will be measured directly after bandaging and two hours later. Our hypothesis is that the majority of therapists will properly apply medium or strong pressure on the lower limbs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphedema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Physical Therapists trained in Lymphatic treatments

Exclusion Criteria

* Have not treated a Lymphatic patient in the past two years
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Haifa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Assuta Hospital Systems

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Woldman Anat, BPT

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Physical Therapist at Maccabi HMO

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maccabi Healthcare Services

Bat Yam, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016032

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.