Evaluation of Pressure Applying Efficiency in Multi-Layer Bandaging
NCT ID: NCT02857621
Last Updated: 2017-08-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
37 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-08-31
2017-04-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The ISL recommends that patients with lymphedema in the lower limb ought to bandage their leg with multi-layer bandaging on a daily basis for a period of two to four weeks. A new classification system for compression bandages was recommended; pressure of \<20 mmHg was categorized as mild, 20-40 mmHg as medium, 40-60 mmHg as strong and ≥60 mmHg as very strong. In patients with leg edema, bandages with strong pressure were shown to be the most effective. However, in the presence of a venous ulcer on a lymphatic leg, pressure between 35 and 45 mmHg is the widely accepted range for sufficient and safe compression. The use of measurement instruments is currently the only realistic method for determining the actual pressure achieved beneath the bandage. However, it is neither economical nor feasib¬le nor is it realistic in terms of time.
Recent studies show that many healthcare professionals use inadequate sub-bandage pressure. No study so far has focused on therapists that are trained in lymphatic treatment. In spite of correct pressure bandaging importance, the question whether physiotherapists succeed in correctly applying it is left unanswered. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the pressure applying efficiency in multi-layer bandaging among physiotherapists in Israel who treat lymphedema.
34 physiotherapists trained in lymphatic treatment will be recruited for this research. Each volunteer will receive a questionnaire concerning their self-perceived competence in the application of compression bandages. Afterwards, two practical trials will be held a week apart in which the subjects will be asked to apply bandages using strong and medium pressure. Using PicoPress®, pressure will be measured directly after bandaging and two hours later. Our hypothesis is that the majority of therapists will properly apply medium or strong pressure on the lower limbs.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Manual Lymph Drainage Applied As an Adjunct to Compression Therapy on Edema Lower Extremity Lymphedema:
NCT06750679
The Effect of LymphaTouch® and Manual Lymphatic Drainage on Extremity Circumference Measurements in Lymphedema
NCT07240324
Effect of Thera-Band Versus Swiss Ball Exercises on Postural Stability in Post Mastectomy Lymphedema
NCT07019311
Effectiveness of Two Compression Methods in the Treatment of Upper Limb Lymphedema
NCT02369679
Therapeutical Assessment of Compression Armsleeves for Lymphatic Indications
NCT01318785
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel
OTHER
University of Haifa
OTHER
Assuta Hospital Systems
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Woldman Anat, BPT
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Physical Therapist at Maccabi HMO
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maccabi Healthcare Services
Bat Yam, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016032
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.