Muscle Energy Technique Versus Maitland Mobilization on Shoulder Pain and Disability

NCT ID: NCT06010381

Last Updated: 2024-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of muscle energy technique versus Maitland's mobilization on shoulder pain and disability after neck dissection surgeries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Thirty patients with shoulder pain and limited ROM post-neck dissection surgeries participated in this study. Patients were subdivided into two groups, fifteen patients in each group. Group A received the muscle energy technique and group B received Maitland's mobilization.

Data obtained from both groups regarding the Visual Analogue Scale, it has a 100-mm-long horizontal line labeled ''no pain' (with or without related facial expressions) at one extreme and ''worst pain ever' at the other. Pain intensity is determined by the length of the line as measured from the left-hand side to the point marked, The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, it has two subscales; The pain subscale includes five questions about pain intensity. The disability subscale includes eight questions about difficulty in different orders. Each question of both pain and disability subscale was scaled in numeric ratings ranging from 0 to 10. Each score was summed up and transformed into percentages. Finally, the average score between pain and disability subscale comprised the total SPADI scores ranging from 0 (the best) to 100 (the worst), and shoulder flexion, abduction, and external ROM were statistically analyzed and compared.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Cancer Mobility Limitation Pain Syndrome Shoulder Pain Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients were subdivided into two groups, fifteen patients in each group. Group A received the muscle energy technique and group B received Maitland's mobilization.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Muscle energy technique

This group includes 15 patients who received muscle energy technique post-surgery in addition to traditional shoulder exercise, 3 sessions/week for four weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Muscle energy technique

Intervention Type OTHER

It was applied on the shoulder flexion and the external rotation. An isometric contraction of the agonist muscle (the muscle which requires stretching) for 7 seconds with gentle muscle contraction to avoid the risk of increasing the muscle tone. This contraction started just short of the restrictive barrier. After that, the patient is asked to relax for 2-3 seconds and then the therapist stretches the contracted muscle in the opposite direction for 30 seconds. This is repeated three repetitions for each muscle.

Traditional shoulder exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Traditional shoulder exercises in the form of shoulder range of motion exercises, stretching exercises and, scapular stabilization.

Maitland mobilization

This group includes 15 patients who received mobilization in addition to traditional shoulder exercise, 3 sessions/week for four weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Maitland mobilization

Intervention Type OTHER

At the start of each session, the physical therapist examined the patient's ROM in all directions to obtain information about the end-range position and the end feel of the glenohumeral joint. Start with rhythmic mid-range mobilization with the patient in a supine position. The therapist's hands are placed close to the glenohumeral joint, and the humerus is brought into a position of maximal flexion in the sagittal plane. After 10 to 15 repetitions of intensive mobilization techniques in this end-range position, the direction of mobilization will be altered by varying the plane of elevation or by varying the degree of rotation. When alternating the direction of mobilization, other movements such as gliding techniques and distraction in that joint position were (inferior gliding, anterior gliding, and posterior gliding).

Traditional shoulder exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Traditional shoulder exercises in the form of shoulder range of motion exercises, stretching exercises and, scapular stabilization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Muscle energy technique

It was applied on the shoulder flexion and the external rotation. An isometric contraction of the agonist muscle (the muscle which requires stretching) for 7 seconds with gentle muscle contraction to avoid the risk of increasing the muscle tone. This contraction started just short of the restrictive barrier. After that, the patient is asked to relax for 2-3 seconds and then the therapist stretches the contracted muscle in the opposite direction for 30 seconds. This is repeated three repetitions for each muscle.

Intervention Type OTHER

Maitland mobilization

At the start of each session, the physical therapist examined the patient's ROM in all directions to obtain information about the end-range position and the end feel of the glenohumeral joint. Start with rhythmic mid-range mobilization with the patient in a supine position. The therapist's hands are placed close to the glenohumeral joint, and the humerus is brought into a position of maximal flexion in the sagittal plane. After 10 to 15 repetitions of intensive mobilization techniques in this end-range position, the direction of mobilization will be altered by varying the plane of elevation or by varying the degree of rotation. When alternating the direction of mobilization, other movements such as gliding techniques and distraction in that joint position were (inferior gliding, anterior gliding, and posterior gliding).

Intervention Type OTHER

Traditional shoulder exercise

Traditional shoulder exercises in the form of shoulder range of motion exercises, stretching exercises and, scapular stabilization.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age range between 25-70 years.
* Male and female patients participated in the study.
* All patients had shoulder pain following different NDS
* All patients had no previous shoulder pain.
* All patients enrolled in the study had their informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous shoulder pain from any other causes.
* Pregnancy.
* Epileptics.
* Radiotherapy.
* Chemotherapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shaimaa Mohamed Ahmed Elsayeh

Lecturer of Physical Therapy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shaimaa MA El Sayeh, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Lecturer at Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shaimaa Mohamed Ahmed El Sayeh

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P.T.REC/012/003370

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.