Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
26 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-05-31
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Esophagogastrectomy Versus Extended Gastrectomy in AEG II
NCT02302118
Influence of Oesophageal Contractile Reserve in High Resolution Manometry on Post Operative Dysphagia After Anti-reflux Surgery
NCT03374930
Prospective Study on the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (P.O.E.M.) for Treatment of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders
NCT01524458
Stent Therapy Versus Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy
NCT03962244
DYsphagiA in interMedIate Care UnitS
NCT04180449
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Merendino Group (MER)
Patients who underwent merendino procedure for benign or early malignant lesions of the distal esophagus/gastroesophageal junction Perioperative data and EORTC and QLQ-C30 / QLQ-OES24 questionnaire
EORTC and QLQ-C30 / QLQ-OES24 questionnaire
EORTC and QLQ-C30 / QLQ-OES24 questionnaire was sent to patients to asses QoL after MER or CON procedure
Control Group (CON)
Patients who underwent alternative surgery for benign or early malignant lesions of the distal esophagus/gastroesophageal junction Perioperative data and EORTC and QLQ-C30 / QLQ-OES24 questionnaire
EORTC and QLQ-C30 / QLQ-OES24 questionnaire
EORTC and QLQ-C30 / QLQ-OES24 questionnaire was sent to patients to asses QoL after MER or CON procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EORTC and QLQ-C30 / QLQ-OES24 questionnaire
EORTC and QLQ-C30 / QLQ-OES24 questionnaire was sent to patients to asses QoL after MER or CON procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* MER or CON procedure
* informed consent
* CON patients were matched according to diagnosis, Age and ASA score
Exclusion Criteria
* legal incapacity
* limitations in mental state or medical condition precluding questioning (only QoL data)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kantonsspital Liestal
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christoph A Maurer, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hirslanden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal
Liestal, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zapletal C, Lorenz D. Quality of life after surgical treatment of early Barrett's cancer: a prospective comparison of the Ivor-Lewis resection versus the modified Merendino resection. A statistical hint: reply. World J Surg. 2014 Nov;38(11):3034. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2723-8. No abstract available.
Gotzky K, Jahne J. [Quality of life after operation for early Barrett's cancer: a prospective comparison of Ivor Lewis resection versus modified Merendino resection]. Chirurg. 2014 Sep;85(9):822. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2856-1. No abstract available. German.
Mangano A, Lianos GD, Rausei S, Boni L, Dionigi G. Quality of life after surgical treatment of early Barrett's cancer: a prospective comparison of the Ivor-Lewis resection versus the modified Merendino resection. A statistical hint. World J Surg. 2014 Nov;38(11):3033. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2624-x. No abstract available.
Zapletal Ch, Heesen Ch, Origer J, Pauthner M, Pech O, Ell Ch, Lorenz D. Quality of life after surgical treatment of early Barrett's cancer: a prospective comparison of the Ivor-Lewis resection versus the modified Merendino resection. World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1444-52. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2410-1.
Holscher AH, Vallbohmer D, Gutschow C, Bollschweiler E. Reflux esophagitis, high-grade neoplasia, and early Barrett's carcinoma-what is the place of the Merendino procedure? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009 May;394(3):417-24. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0429-9. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KLiestal
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.