An RCT to Evaluate the Effect of a New Skin Care Regimen on SBF in Those With Podoconiosis
NCT ID: NCT02839772
Last Updated: 2017-01-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
193 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of a Basic Skin Care Product on the Structural Strength of the Skin
NCT03625167
Skin Health and Effectiveness of Standardized Skin Care Regimens in Nursing Home Residents
NCT02216526
Paraffin Bath Therapy for Chronic Hand Eczema
NCT04510961
Urea Cream Prevention for Capecitabine Associated Hand Foot Syndrome
NCT05348278
Evaluation of Effects of HP828-101 for Moisture Associated Skin Damage
NCT01108523
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although the current treatment skin care regimen is effective there is no robust evidence on optimal skin care regimens to improve skin barrier function in this disease.
Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of a new, low-cost, evidence-based skin care intervention to improve SBF in the lower limbs of those with podoconiosis.
Method. A randomized control trial (RCT) was conducted over 3 months in two APA Clinics (n=193). Intervention was 2% glycerine (v/v) added to a reduced amount of soaking water (1 litre versus 6 litres). The control group received the current skin care regimen. The primary outcome measure was skin barrier function (SBF). This was determined by measures of trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum hydration (SCH) at four specific sites on the lower limbs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Current skin care regimen
Legs/feet washed daily for 3 months with soapy water, soak for 30 mins in 6 litres of water with added sodium hypochlorite (0.0125%), air dried, thin layer of petrolatum jelly applied and Whitfields ointment if required for any fungal infection.
Current skin care regimen
Current skin regimen plus 2% glycerine
Legs/feet washed daily for 3 months with soapy water, soak for 30 mins in 1 litre of water with added sodium hypochlorite (0.0125%) and 2% glycerine, air dried, thin layer of petrolatum jelly applied and Whitfields ointment if required for any fungal infection.
Current skin care regimen plus 2% glycerine added to soaking water
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Current skin care regimen plus 2% glycerine added to soaking water
Current skin care regimen
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who were able to understand instructions and give informed consent as determined by the nurses at the outreach clinics.
* Patients over 18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who were unable to understand instructions or give informed consent as determined by nurses at the outreach clinics.
* Patients under 18 years of age.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Procter and Gamble
INDUSTRY
University of Hull
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jill Brooks
PhD student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jill Brooks, PhD student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Hull, UK
Steven J Ersser, PhD,
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Leeds, UK
Fiona C Cowdell, DProf,
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Hull, UK
Eric Gardiner, PhD,
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Hull, UK
Paul J Matts, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Procter and Gamble
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UHull
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.