Validation and Clinical Application of Dysphagia Screening Questionnaire
NCT ID: NCT02838771
Last Updated: 2016-09-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
293 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-03-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Turkish Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Screening Test for Patients and Professionals
NCT03907566
Dysphagia Symptom Severity and Quality of Life
NCT03241615
Evolution of the Chicago Classification: Bridging Physiology and Mechanics
NCT06883175
Design and Implementation of a Nutritional Intervention in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
NCT02959450
Lingual Tonsil Hypertrophy Grading and Its Relation to Sociodemographic Factors and Clinical Symptoms
NCT02926014
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The case - control study groups were tested using dysphagia screening questionnaire and clinical screening - water drinking test. Barthel index and nutrition questionnaire were used to identify the nutritional and functional state. M. D. Anderson dysphagia inventory questionnaire, sf-12 questionnaire were used to assess dysphagia effects on the quality of life.
The research group consisted of two subgroups - 171 nursing home residents from 3 different nursing homes and 82 outpatients of the Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. The control group consisted of randomly selected 40 community-dwelling elderly healthy individuals.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Research group participants
Research group consisted of 171 elderly nursing home residents and 82 outpatients of the Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences.
The participants were given the dysphagia screening questionnaire, consisted of 16 questions and the several sips of water to drink (clinical water drinking test for dysphagia screening).
Water drinking test
Patient takes a sip of water about 60-70 ml. We assess: coughing, choking, voice changes.
Dysphagia screening questionnaire
Lithuanian version of the questionnaire consists of 16 questions. Interpretation of dysphagia screening questionnaire: advanced symptom - 2 points, moderate intensity symptom - 1 point, no symptom - 0 point. At least one advanced symptom means - dysphagia. Higher score represents stronger dysphagia intensity. The maximum score is 32 points.
Control group participants
Community-dwelling elderly healthy individuals. The participants were given the dysphagia screening questionnaire, consisted of 16 questions and the several sips of water to drink (clinical water drinking test for dysphagia screening).
Water drinking test
Patient takes a sip of water about 60-70 ml. We assess: coughing, choking, voice changes.
Dysphagia screening questionnaire
Lithuanian version of the questionnaire consists of 16 questions. Interpretation of dysphagia screening questionnaire: advanced symptom - 2 points, moderate intensity symptom - 1 point, no symptom - 0 point. At least one advanced symptom means - dysphagia. Higher score represents stronger dysphagia intensity. The maximum score is 32 points.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Water drinking test
Patient takes a sip of water about 60-70 ml. We assess: coughing, choking, voice changes.
Dysphagia screening questionnaire
Lithuanian version of the questionnaire consists of 16 questions. Interpretation of dysphagia screening questionnaire: advanced symptom - 2 points, moderate intensity symptom - 1 point, no symptom - 0 point. At least one advanced symptom means - dysphagia. Higher score represents stronger dysphagia intensity. The maximum score is 32 points.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Consent for participating in the research
* No cognitive disorders or mental illnesses
Exclusion Criteria
* Serious mental or cognitive conditions
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Klaipėda University
OTHER
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nora Siupsinskiene
Professor medical doctor of otorhinolaryngology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nora Siupsinskiene, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Otorhinolaryngology department
Nora Siupsinskiene, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Klaipėda University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Kaunas, , Lithuania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DSQ1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.