Diagnostic Evaluation of Esophageal Motility Disorders Using the Chicago IV Protocol in Egypt
NCT ID: NCT06878586
Last Updated: 2025-03-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
157 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-04-01
2027-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The Chicago Classification (CC) was introduced to standardize the interpretation of HRM findings and facilitate communication among clinicians. Since its inception in 2009, the classification has undergone several updates to reflect ongoing advancements. The most recent update, Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CC v4.0), resulted from two years of collaboration by an international working group of motility experts . This version places a greater emphasis on clinical relevance, refining diagnostic criteria to include standardized assessments in both the supine and upright positions, as well as the use of provocative maneuvers to provide a more thorough evaluation of esophageal function
. These enhancements aim to improve the understanding and diagnosis of complex motility disorders Although CC version 3.0 (CC v3.0) has been widely utilized, it has limitations that CC v4.0 effectively addresses to enhance esophageal motility testing. By requiring assessments in both supine and upright positions, CC v4.0 captures motility abnormalities in more physiologically relevant conditions, The inclusion of provocative testing methods, such as multiple rapid swallows (MRS) and solid swallows, further increases sensitivity for detecting disorders under stress. Moreover, CC v4.0 offers a comprehensive analysis of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function, introducing criteria for EGJ outflow obstruction and EGJ typing, which clarify interactions with the lower esophageal sphincter . This updated framework also emphasizes bolus transit and metrics for fragmented peristalsis, facilitating the identification of subtle motility issues that may impact bolus clearance In Egypt, the majority of manometric devices are configured to automatically interpret results using CC v3.0, limiting the integration of newer diagnostic criteria. By manually applying CC v4.0 in this study, we seek to determine whether its updated metrics offer enhanced diagnostic precision and a better correlation with clinical symptoms.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Motor Activity in Patients with Extra Esophageal Reflux Symptoms
NCT06773702
Laryngeal Disorders and GERD in Assiut University
NCT04231344
Esophageal Impedance and Manometry Measurements and Dysphagia Symptom Scoring
NCT04503785
Endoscopic I-scan Versus Histopathological Evaluation Of Esophageal Lesions
NCT05876702
Effects of Position and a Test Meal on Esophago-gastric Junction Morphology and Function Assessed by High-resolution Impedance Manometry (HRM)
NCT02397616
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) at Ain Shams University presenting symptoms such as dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, or heartburn.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
abdelrahman Rashid abdelrhman
residant doctor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Esophageal Motility Chicago IV
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.