A Multi-center, Randomized, Subject Blind, Active Controlled Design Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Volus as Compared to PowerFill® for Temporary Penile Enhancement
NCT ID: NCT02833532
Last Updated: 2017-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-30
2017-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Potenfill for Temporary Penile Enhancement
NCT03512717
Observational Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Potenfill for Temporary Penile Enhancement
NCT04496427
The Efficacy and Safety of Repeat-dose Potenfill for Temporary Penile Enhancement
NCT03840070
Clinical Study to CMDHA0101 as Compared to PowerFill® for Temporary Penile Enhancement
NCT03153735
External Device for Erectile Dysfunction (3D-Erect)
NCT04624126
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Volus
Maxium: 22ml
Volus/Powerfill
Maximum: 22ml
Powerfill
Maxium: 22ml
Volus/Powerfill
Maximum: 22ml
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Volus/Powerfill
Maximum: 22ml
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. be rating himself, when screening, as "Small or Very Small" on Self-Questioned Questionnaire ( SQQ) including the question: " How do you rate your penile size? // Very small, Small, Normal, Big, Very Big?"
3. During the study period, subjects will not received any treatments associated with penile enhancement.
4. Subjects will sign an informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subjects who have penile malformation (e.g. Peyronie's disease), which can make impossible to perform the intervention
3. Allergic to hyalluronic acid.
4. Inflammatory or/and infectious disease on penis that can affect on this study
20 Years
65 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Associacio catalana per a la recerca oncologica i les seves implicacions sanitaries i socials
OTHER
Hugel
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
HUGEL
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yang DY, Ko K, Lee SH, Lee WK. A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety Between Hyaluronic Acid and Polylactic Acid Filler Injection in Penile Augmentation: A Multicenter, Patient/Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized Trial. J Sex Med. 2019 Apr;16(4):577-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.310. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AC-Volus-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.