Outcome of Cetrotide Therapy for Management of Women at High-risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT02823080
Last Updated: 2017-03-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2/PHASE3
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2017-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients \& Methods: Forty-eight women fulfilling inclusion criteria underwent ultrasound scanning for maximal ovarian diameter (MOD) estimation and ascites grading. Patients underwent embryo freezing, but study group received 3-day Cetrotide sc injection (0.25 mg/day) started on Day-0. Serum E2, pain scores and MOD were checked daily. Hematocrit value (Ht%), total leucocytic count (TLC), gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations and ascites grading were re-evaluated on Day-3, 6 and 8
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Luteal Antagonist Versus Conventional Treatment in Women With Severe Early Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS)
NCT02392520
Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist in Treatment of Early-onset Severe Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
NCT02784457
The Role of Cetrotide Acetate in Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) in Oocyte Donors
NCT00867659
Progesterone Primed Ovarian Stimulation Versus GnRH Antagonist in With Expected High Ovarian Response Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization
NCT05951400
A Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Cetrotide® 3 Milligram (mg) Versus Antagon™ in Women Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation
NCT00298025
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All patients are clinically evaluated for the presence of abdominal pain and if present will be graduated using a numerical pain visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 means no pain and 10 means severe intolerable pain. Patients are evaluated for the presence of nausea and/or vomiting and sense of abdominal distension. Symptoms are scored using verbal analogue scale as nil, mild, moderate, and severe symptom. Blood samples are obtained under complete aseptic condition for estimation of serum E2 level and determination of hematocrit value (Ht%) and total leucocytic count (TLC).
Then, all patients underwent ultrasound scanning for estimation of ovarian measurements that were represented as the maximal ovarian diameter (MOD) and for ascites grading if present. Ultrasound scanning is performed using a 5 megahertz vaginal probe , otherwise a 3.5 megahertz, 2.6 megahertz or 5megahertz abdominal probe is used if visualization using a vaginal probe is compromised. Ascites is graded according to the quantity of fluid accumulation in the peritoneal cavity with the patient in the anti-Trendelenburg position.
Women fulfilling inclusion criteria were randomely allocated,using sealed envelops, into two equal groups. Group with embryo freezing alone (Control group) or while the other group additionally receives cetrotide subcutaneous injection in a daily dose of 0.25 mg started on day of oocyte retrieval for 3 days (Study group). Symptomatic treatment for associated symptoms as analgesics, antiemetics and antispasmodics are also prescribed. Patients are categorized according to classification grading of OHSS.
Class Clinical features Biochemical features
Mild - Abdominal distension/ discomfort
* Mild nausea/vomiting
* Diarrhea
* Ovarian size usually \< 8 cm No clinically important laboratory findings
Moderate - Mild features plus
* US evidence of ascites - Elevated Ht (\>41%)
* Elevated TLC \>15,000/ ml
* Hypoproteinemia
Severe - Mild \& Moderate features plus
* Clinically detected ascites
* Severe abdominal pain
* Intractable nausea
* Rapid weight gain (\>1 kg/24 hr)
* Pleural effusion
* Severe dyspnea
* Oliguria/anuria
* Low blood/central venous pressures
* Syncope
* Venous thrombosis
* Hemoconcentration (Ht \>55%)
* TLC \>25,000/ ml
* Serum creatinine \>1.6 mg/dl
* creatinine clearance \<50 ml/min
* Hyponatremia (Na+\<135milliequivalent per litre)
* Hypokalemia (K+ \< 5 milliequivalent per litre)
* Elevated liver enzymes
Critical - Severe features plus
* Anuria/ Acute renal failure
* Arrhythmia
* Pericardial effusion
* Massive hydrothorax
* Thrombo-embolism
* Arterial thrombosis
* (ARDS)Adult respiratory distress syndrome
* Sepsis - Worsening of biochemical
findings seen with severe OHSS
US: Ultrasound; Ht%:Ht; Hematocrit value; TLC: Total leucocytic count: ARDS; adult respiratory distress syndrome.
All patients are managed as outpatients unless management of severe symptoms necessitated hospital admission. Pain scores, serum E2 levels and MOD are evaluated daily. Patients are evaluated for associated symptoms previously determined during clinical evaluation, ascites grading and TLC and Ht value were evaluated at 3 and 6 days and on end of the trial on the 8th day after oocyte retrieval.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cetrotide
study group (24 patients = intervention) received intervention for 3-daysCetrorelix Acetate sc injection (0.25 mg/day) started on Day-0. Serum E2, pain scores and MOD were checked daily. Hematocrit value (Ht%), total leucocytic count (TLC), gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations and ascites grading were re-evaluated on Day-3, 6 and 8.
Cetrorelix
study group received 3-day Cetrorelix Acetate sc injection (0.25 mg/day) started on Day-0. Serum E2, pain scores and MOD were checked daily. Hematocrit value (Ht%), total leucocytic count (TLC), gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations and ascites control (24 patients) did not receive Cetrorelix Acetate. Grading were re-evaluated on Day-3, 6 and 8.
no cetrotide
control group (24 patients) did not receive 3-daysCetrorelix Acetate (no intervention). Serum E2, pain scores and MOD were checked daily. Hematocrit value (Ht%), total leucocytic count (TLC), gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations and ascites grading were re-evaluated on Day-3, 6 and 8.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cetrorelix
study group received 3-day Cetrorelix Acetate sc injection (0.25 mg/day) started on Day-0. Serum E2, pain scores and MOD were checked daily. Hematocrit value (Ht%), total leucocytic count (TLC), gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations and ascites control (24 patients) did not receive Cetrorelix Acetate. Grading were re-evaluated on Day-3, 6 and 8.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. mean number of follicles with a diameter of \>16 mm was ≥18
3. serum E2 concentrations of ≥3500 pg/ml
4. ovarian diameter on the day of ovum retrieval of \>10 cm
5. presentation of evident symptoms of OHSS on the day of aspiration .
20 Years
35 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Benha University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
khalid mohammed salama
director clinical research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
khalid M salama, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Benha University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Benha university hospitalا
Banhā, El Qalubia, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976 Jun;2(2):175-84. No abstract available.
Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas GT, Kolibianakis EM. Management of severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by re-initiation of GnRH antagonist. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Oct;15(4):408-12. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60366-5.
Albano C, Smitz J, Camus M, Riethmuller-Winzen H, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Comparison of different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril. 1997 May;67(5):917-22. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81407-0.
Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril. 1992 Aug;58(2):249-61. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55188-7.
Salama KM, Abo Ragab HM, El Sherbiny MF, Morsi AA, Souidan II. Sequential E2 levels not ovarian maximal diameter estimates were correlated with outcome of cetrotide therapy for management of women at high-risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a randomized controlled study. BMC Womens Health. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0466-z.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
infertility
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
kmsalama
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Benha U
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.