General Anesthesia Versus Sedation During Intra-arterial Treatment for Stroke

NCT ID: NCT02822144

Last Updated: 2023-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

351 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-29

Study Completion Date

2020-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In France, the annual incidence rate of acute ischaemic stroke is around 150 000 patients, 65 % of whom keep long-term disability. Several multicentric randomized controlled trials have shown the benefit of a mechanical thrombectomy in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke on functional disability, compared to a medical treatment alone (thrombolysis).

The timeliness of revascularisation is an essential factor of good prognosis. This intra-arterial treatment, associated with thrombolysis if applicable, is the reference treatment of large-vessel occlusion. The stillness of the patient is required to control the safety of the recanalization. Currently, either a general anesthesia or a sedation can be performed.

Several studies have shown a trend to superiority of the sedation but none was conducted with a high level of proof methodology.

The aim of our multicentric randomized controlled trial is to compare sedation and general anesthesia during intra-arterial thrombectomy for an acute ischaemic stroke in the anterior cerebral circulation. The main outcome will be the efficacy on the functional neurological prognosis at 3 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

general anesthesia

General anesthesia with etomidate, succinylcholine, propofol and remifentanil

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Etomidate

Intervention Type DRUG

Succinylcholine

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

sedation

Sedation with remifentanil and local anesthesia with lidocaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Etomidate

Intervention Type DRUG

Succinylcholine

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years
* Body mass index \< or equal to 35 kg/m² ,
* Indication for thrombectomy, after multidisciplinary consultation,
* Proximal artery occlusion in the anterior circulation (internal carotid artery, M1, M2,...), confirmed on imaging (angioscan or angio-MRI),
* Written informed consent of the patient or a close / trusted person when possible, or emergency procedure,
* Patient affiliated to or beneficiary of an health insurance


* Comorbidity committing short-term prognosis,
* Hemodynamic instability,
* Pregnant woman,
* Contra-indication to sedation: pre-existing swallowing impairment; restless patient, not able to stay lying down; Glasgow score \< 8,
* Contra-indication to general anesthesia,
* Intubated patient at inclusion,
* Additional intracerebral hemorrhage,
* Sign of occlusion in a different cerebral territory,
* Known contra-indication to succinylcholine: hypersensitivity, hyperkaliemia,
* Known contra-indication to one of the anesthesic agents,
* Patient participating in another clinical trial, possibly interfering with the study procedures,
* Patient in a known situation of deprivation of freedom, guardianship or curatorship.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with deprivation of freedom will be excluded as soon as the investigator will have knowledge of the situation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rennes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Axelle MAURICE, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rennes University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Département d'anesthésie-réanimation - Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, CHU de Brest

Brest, , France

Site Status

Service d'anesthésie-réanimation - Fondation A. de Rothschild

Paris, , France

Site Status

Fédération d'anesthésie-réanimation - Hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Service d'anesthésie-réanimation 1 - Hôpital Bretonneau, CHU de Tours

Tours, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Maurice A, Eugene F, Ronziere T, Devys JM, Taylor G, Subileau A, Huet O, Gherbi H, Laffon M, Esvan M, Laviolle B, Beloeil H; GASS (General Anesthesia versus Sedation for Acute Stroke Treatment) Study Group and the French Society of Anesthesiologists (SFAR) Research Network. General Anesthesia versus Sedation, Both with Hemodynamic Control, during Intraarterial Treatment for Stroke: The GASS Randomized Trial. Anesthesiology. 2022 Apr 1;136(4):567-576. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004142.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35226737 (View on PubMed)

Tosello R, Riera R, Tosello G, Clezar CN, Amorim JE, Vasconcelos V, Joao BB, Flumignan RL. Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 20;7(7):CD013690. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013690.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35857365 (View on PubMed)

Maurice A, Ferre JC, Ronziere T, Devys JM, Subileau A, Laffon M, Laviolle B, Beloeil H; SFAR research network. GASS Trial study protocol: a multicentre, single-blind, randomised clinical trial comparing general anaesthesia and sedation during intra-arterial treatment for stroke. BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 1;9(5):e024249. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024249.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31154292 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-000795-25

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

35RC15_8957

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.