SEdation Versus General Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT ID: NCT03263117
Last Updated: 2025-11-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
260 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-01
2023-04-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aims to estimate overall treatment benefit (improvement in disability) among acute ischemic stroke patients that are randomized to General Anesthesia (GA) compared with Sedation (CS) during endovascular therapy. Assess safety (as measured by incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage); rates of Endovascular therapy (EVT) procedural complications, reperfusion; and quality of life.
Hypothesis:
GA during EVT for acute ischemic stroke improves functional outcomes at 90 days compared to sedation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
General Anesthesia Versus Sedation During Intra-arterial Treatment for Stroke
NCT02822144
Endovascular Thrombectomy With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Extended Time Window
NCT05634382
Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial
NCT02350283
Efficacy and Safety of Early Initiation of Butylphthalide Treatment in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.
NCT06472921
Intra-Arterial Magnesium Therapy After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT06956521
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sedation
The protocol does not specify a particular combination of drugs that must be used for sedation. The choice of specific drugs and dosages for achieving sedation will be up to the anesthesiologist.
Sedation
The protocol does not specify a particular combination of drugs that must be used for sedation.
The most common drugs utilized for sedation and wide dosing ranges are included in the protocol (i.e., sedation will be provided under the supervision of an anesthesiologist and may use a combination of fentanyl, midazolam, dexmedetomidine infusion (with or without loading dose), and/or low-dose propofol by intermittent bolus or infusion); however, the choice of specific drugs and dosages for achieving conscious sedation or general anesthesia will not be specified by the protocol but will be up to the anesthesiologist.
Intra-arterial Thrombectomy
The first line therapeutic embolectomy device should be a stent retriever. Additional Endovascular therapies including, but not limited to, intra- or extracranial angioplasty ± stenting; antithrombotics (oral, IV or IA antiplatelets or anticoagulants) intra-arterial thrombolytics; are left to the decision of the local treatment team.
General Anesthesia
The protocol does not specify a particular combination of drugs that must be used for general anesthesia. The choice of specific drugs and dosages for achieving general anesthesia will be up to the anesthesiologist.
General Anesthesia (GA)
The protocol doesn't specify drugs that must be used for GA, the choice of drugs and dosages for achieving general anesthesia will not be specified by the protocol but will be up to the anesthesiologist.
The most common drugs utilized for GA and wide dosing ranges included in the protocol are (GA will be provided under the supervision of an anesthesiologist and induction of anesthesia may be achieved with propofol and/or etomidate; muscle paralysis may be achieved with succinylcholine or non-depolarizing paralytic (rocuronium or vecuronium); and adjuvant lidocaine and fentanyl; if intravenous maintenance of anesthesia is used, it may be achieved by propofol infusion at 50 to 150 mcg/kg/min with redosing of non-depolarizing paralytic and fentanyl as needed; if inhalational maintenance of anesthesia is used it will be achieved with sevoflurane 1% to 2% or desflurane 3% to 6% end-tidal concentration with redosing of non-depolarizing paralytic and fentanyl as needed)
Intra-arterial Thrombectomy
The first line therapeutic embolectomy device should be a stent retriever. Additional Endovascular therapies including, but not limited to, intra- or extracranial angioplasty ± stenting; antithrombotics (oral, IV or IA antiplatelets or anticoagulants) intra-arterial thrombolytics; are left to the decision of the local treatment team.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sedation
The protocol does not specify a particular combination of drugs that must be used for sedation.
The most common drugs utilized for sedation and wide dosing ranges are included in the protocol (i.e., sedation will be provided under the supervision of an anesthesiologist and may use a combination of fentanyl, midazolam, dexmedetomidine infusion (with or without loading dose), and/or low-dose propofol by intermittent bolus or infusion); however, the choice of specific drugs and dosages for achieving conscious sedation or general anesthesia will not be specified by the protocol but will be up to the anesthesiologist.
General Anesthesia (GA)
The protocol doesn't specify drugs that must be used for GA, the choice of drugs and dosages for achieving general anesthesia will not be specified by the protocol but will be up to the anesthesiologist.
The most common drugs utilized for GA and wide dosing ranges included in the protocol are (GA will be provided under the supervision of an anesthesiologist and induction of anesthesia may be achieved with propofol and/or etomidate; muscle paralysis may be achieved with succinylcholine or non-depolarizing paralytic (rocuronium or vecuronium); and adjuvant lidocaine and fentanyl; if intravenous maintenance of anesthesia is used, it may be achieved by propofol infusion at 50 to 150 mcg/kg/min with redosing of non-depolarizing paralytic and fentanyl as needed; if inhalational maintenance of anesthesia is used it will be achieved with sevoflurane 1% to 2% or desflurane 3% to 6% end-tidal concentration with redosing of non-depolarizing paralytic and fentanyl as needed)
Intra-arterial Thrombectomy
The first line therapeutic embolectomy device should be a stent retriever. Additional Endovascular therapies including, but not limited to, intra- or extracranial angioplasty ± stenting; antithrombotics (oral, IV or IA antiplatelets or anticoagulants) intra-arterial thrombolytics; are left to the decision of the local treatment team.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Internal Carotid Artery (terminal "T" or "L-type"- occlusion)
2. Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) M1 or proximal M2
3. Anterior Cerebral Artery (ACA) A1 or proximal A2
* Patients who receive IV-tPA thrombolysis are eligible provided the drug was delivered within 4.5 hours of stroke onset or last seen normal and in accordance with local hospital standard of care.
2. Ages 18-90.
3. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 6-30
4. Time of from stroke symptom onset of last seen normal to start of EVT (defined as groin puncture) ≤ 16 hours.
5. Limited infarct core, as defined below and adapted from the 2018 American Heart Association guidelines
1. For patients presenting ≤ 6 hours from time of symptom onset or last seen normal, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) ≥ 6
2. For patients presenting \> 6 hours and ≤ 16 hours from time of symptom onset or last seen normal, they must satisfy EITHER ONE of the two following criteria:
i. Ischemic core by CT Perfusion or MRI/MR Perfusion \< 70 mL, a ratio of volume of penumbral tissue to infarct core of ≥ 1.8, and and absolute volume of penumbral tissue of ≥ 15 mL OR ii. For patients with NIHSS ≥ 10, infarct core of \< 31 mL by CT Perfusion or MRI; For patients with NIHSS ≥ 20, infarct core \< 51 mL.
6. Subject willing/able to return for protocol required follow up visits.
7. No significant pre-stroke disability (modified Rankin Score must be ≤ 2).
8. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test.
9. Patient or patient's legally authorized representative has given Informed Consent according to Good Clinical Practices (GCP) and/or local IRB policies.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Severe agitation or seizures on admission that preclude safe vascular access.
3. Loss of airway protective reflexes and/or vomiting on admission.
4. Predicted or known difficult airway.
5. Pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological or functional evaluations, e.g. dementia.
6. Presumed septic embolus, or suspicion of bacterial endocarditis
7. Currently participating or has participated in any investigational drug or device study within 30 days.
8. Inability to follow-up for 90-day assessment.
9. Known history of allergy to anesthesia drugs.
10. Known history or family history of malignant hyperthermia
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
OTHER
Stryker Neurovascular
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Peng Roc Chen, MD
Professor in Neurosurgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peng Roc Chen, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Andrew Barreto, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Carlos Artime, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Sunil Sheth, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Sean Savitz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Claudia Pedroza, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Indiana University College of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Rochester Regional Health
Rochester, New York, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Geisinger Health
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Memorial Hermann Hospital System - Memorial City Medical Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center Houston with Memorial Hermann Hospital System - The Medical Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Memorial Hermann Hospital System - The Woodlands Medical Center
The Woodlands, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chen PR, Artime CA, Sheth SA, Pedroza C, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Wolfe S, Sitton C, Kan P, Tanweer O, Chebl A, Schirmer CM, Morrow JT, Alderazi YJ, Bohnstedt B, Erkmen K, Samaniego EA, Garrido E, Savitz SI, Engstrom A, Aguilar E, Nguyen T, Barreto AD; SEGA Investigators. Sedation vs General Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SEGA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2025 Oct 13. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3775. Online ahead of print.
Tosello R, Riera R, Tosello G, Clezar CN, Amorim JE, Vasconcelos V, Joao BB, Flumignan RL. Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 20;7(7):CD013690. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013690.pub2.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HSC-MS-17-0436
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.