Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
135 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
UACE Followed by Uterine Suction Curettage for the Treatment of Caesarean Scar Pregnancy
NCT02357095
Comparison Between Hysterectomy and Conservative Management in Treatment of Placenta Accreta Regarding Maternal Complication
NCT03327818
Comparison Between Cervical Tourniquet and Uterine Artery Ligation Prior to Segmental Resection Approach
NCT06483724
Permanent Occlusion of Uteine Arteies in Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
NCT05423067
Uterine Cavity and Blood Flow After Conservative Management of Placenta Previa/Accreta
NCT02878187
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Placenta accrete is an increasingly prevalent and potentially dangerous complication of pregnancy. It appears to be most strongly predicted by a history of cesarean deliveries and low-lying placenta/previa. Additional risk factors include in vitro fertilization pregnancy, prior myomectomy, Asherman's syndrome, submucous leiomyomata, maternal age older than 35 years, elevated second-trimester levels of α-fetoprotein and β-human chorionic gonadotropin.
Pregnancies complicated with placenta accrete are associated with adverse maternal outcomes, including life-threatening maternal haemorrhage, large-volume blood transfusion, uterine rupture and peripartum hysterectomy. Moreover , strong association was found between abnormal placentation to significant perinatal morbidity and mortality such as small for gestational age, preterm delivery, neonatal intensive care unit hospitalization, perinatal death and neonatal death.
Prenatal diagnosis and adequate planning, particularly in high-risk populations, is indicated for the reduction of these adverse outcomes. Advances in grayscale and Doppler ultrasound have facilitated prenatal diagnosis. Despite advances in imaging techniques, no diagnostic technique affords the clinician complete assurance of the presence or absence of placenta accreta.
Management of placenta accrete could be conservative (aiming for uterine preservation) or interventional ( elective cesarean hysterectomy ) depending on the patients will to maintain the uterus for future fertility, the degree of placentation abnormality or complications during delivery. The extent (area, depth) of the abnormal attachment will determine the response-curettage, wedge resection, medical management, or hysterectomy. Uterine conserving options may work in small focal accretas, but abdominal hysterectomy usually is the most definitive treatment.
Post-partum hemorrhage is the major concern dealing with placenta accrete. Women with placenta accreta have a higher incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and are more likely to undergo emergency hysterectomy .
If the diagnosis or a strong suspicion is formed before delivery, a number of measures should be taken including counseling the patient about the likelihood of hysterectomy and blood transfusion, preparing blood products and clotting factors and considering using cell saver technology.The appropriate location and timing for delivery should be considered to allow access to adequate surgical personnel and equipment and a preoperative anesthesia assessment should be obtained.
A patient with stable vital signs and persistent bleeding, especially if the rate of loss is not excessive, may be a candidate for arterial embolization. Radiographic identification of bleeding vessels allows embolization with gelfoam, coils, or glue. Balloon occlusion is also a technique used in such circumstances. Embolization can be used for bleeding that continues after hysterectomy or can be used as an alternative to hysterectomy to preserve fertility.
Studies estimating the fertility and pregnancy outcomes after successful conservative treatment for placenta accrete have demonstrated placenta accreta does not appear to compromise the patients' subsequent fertility or obstetrical outcome.
By reviewing the literature, no prospective studies have specifically evaluated fertility, following uterine artery embolization during cesarean section due to placenta accrete .
Methods:
Women that were operated and fit inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in the study after getting advanced notice on requirements . After giving informed consent to participate in the study, demographic parameters and medical history will be taken, including - age , Body Mass Index ( BMI), parity, gravity, past medical history, past operations.
preoperative intra operative and post operative information will be collected.
All women participating will complete -
1. Day 2 blood sample for hormonal profile - follicle stimulating hormone ( FSH), estrogen (E2), progesterone (P)
2. Blood sample for anti mullarian hormon (AMH)
3. Vaginal ultrasound assessing antral follicle count (AFC)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Post surgery and embolization
Blood sample for hormonal profile: estrogen , progesterone, anti mullarian hormone ( AMH) Vaginal ultrasound to estimate antral follicle count ( AFC)
Vaginal ultrasound
Blood sample
Control group
Blood sample for hormonal profile: estrogen , progesterone, anti mullarian hormone ( AMH) Vaginal ultrasound to estimate antral follicle count ( AFC)
Vaginal ultrasound
Blood sample
Post surgery with accreta without embolization
Blood sample for hormonal profile: estrogen , progesterone, anti mullarian hormone ( AMH) Vaginal ultrasound to estimate antral follicle count ( AFC)
Vaginal ultrasound
Blood sample
Post surgery without accreta without embolization
Blood sample for hormonal profile: estrogen , progesterone, anti mullarian hormone ( AMH)
Blood sample
Normal Vaginal Delivery - no suspected accreta
Blood sample for hormonal profile: estrogen , progesterone, anti mullarian hormone ( AMH)
Blood sample
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vaginal ultrasound
Blood sample
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* S/P cesarean section with bilateral uterine arteries embolization.
* Age 18-42
Control group ( from IVF clinic)
* infertility treatment due to male factor
* Single patients for sperm donation
* Age 18-42
Exclusion Criteria
* Hysterectomy due to the procedure
18 Years
42 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sheba Medical Center
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Aya Mohr-Sasson
Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aya Mohr Sasson
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sheba Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. The management and outcomes of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta in the UK: a population-based descriptive study. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):62-70; discussion 70-1. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12405. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Sergienko R, Sheiner E. Placenta accreta: risk factors, perinatal outcomes, and consequences for subsequent births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):219.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.037. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
Balayla J, Bondarenko HD. Placenta accreta and the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Perinat Med. 2013 Mar;41(2):141-9. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0219.
Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jul;66(1):89-92.
Oyelese Y, Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;107(4):927-41. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000207559.15715.98.
Vahanian SA, Lavery JA, Ananth CV, Vintzileos A. Placental implantation abnormalities and risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4 Suppl):S78-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.058.
Rao KP, Belogolovkin V, Yankowitz J, Spinnato JA 2nd. Abnormal placentation: evidence-based diagnosis and management of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012 Aug;67(8):503-19. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182685870.
Zaki ZM, Bahar AM, Ali ME, Albar HA, Gerais MA. Risk factors and morbidity in patients with placenta previa accreta compared to placenta previa non-accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Apr;77(4):391-4.
Mohr-Sasson A, Haas J, Bar-Adon S, Shats M, Hochman R, Orvieto R, Mazaki-Tovi S, Sivan E. The Influence of Cesarean Delivery on Ovarian Reserve: a Prospective Cohort Study. Reprod Sci. 2022 Feb;29(2):639-645. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00730-z. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3178-16- SMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.