Fertility Post Placenta Accrete

NCT ID: NCT02821702

Last Updated: 2020-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

135 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is the first to investigate the fertility outcome and the influence on ovarian reserve after using uterine artery embolization during cesarean delivery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Placenta accreta is an abnormal adherence of the placenta to the uterine wall. Three variants of abnormally invasive placentation have been described: placenta accreta, in which placental villi invade the surface of the myometrium; placenta increta, in which placental villi extend into the myometrium; and placenta percreta, where the villi penetrate through the myometrium to the uterine serosa and may invade adjacent organs, such as the bladder.

Placenta accrete is an increasingly prevalent and potentially dangerous complication of pregnancy. It appears to be most strongly predicted by a history of cesarean deliveries and low-lying placenta/previa. Additional risk factors include in vitro fertilization pregnancy, prior myomectomy, Asherman's syndrome, submucous leiomyomata, maternal age older than 35 years, elevated second-trimester levels of α-fetoprotein and β-human chorionic gonadotropin.

Pregnancies complicated with placenta accrete are associated with adverse maternal outcomes, including life-threatening maternal haemorrhage, large-volume blood transfusion, uterine rupture and peripartum hysterectomy. Moreover , strong association was found between abnormal placentation to significant perinatal morbidity and mortality such as small for gestational age, preterm delivery, neonatal intensive care unit hospitalization, perinatal death and neonatal death.

Prenatal diagnosis and adequate planning, particularly in high-risk populations, is indicated for the reduction of these adverse outcomes. Advances in grayscale and Doppler ultrasound have facilitated prenatal diagnosis. Despite advances in imaging techniques, no diagnostic technique affords the clinician complete assurance of the presence or absence of placenta accreta.

Management of placenta accrete could be conservative (aiming for uterine preservation) or interventional ( elective cesarean hysterectomy ) depending on the patients will to maintain the uterus for future fertility, the degree of placentation abnormality or complications during delivery. The extent (area, depth) of the abnormal attachment will determine the response-curettage, wedge resection, medical management, or hysterectomy. Uterine conserving options may work in small focal accretas, but abdominal hysterectomy usually is the most definitive treatment.

Post-partum hemorrhage is the major concern dealing with placenta accrete. Women with placenta accreta have a higher incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and are more likely to undergo emergency hysterectomy .

If the diagnosis or a strong suspicion is formed before delivery, a number of measures should be taken including counseling the patient about the likelihood of hysterectomy and blood transfusion, preparing blood products and clotting factors and considering using cell saver technology.The appropriate location and timing for delivery should be considered to allow access to adequate surgical personnel and equipment and a preoperative anesthesia assessment should be obtained.

A patient with stable vital signs and persistent bleeding, especially if the rate of loss is not excessive, may be a candidate for arterial embolization. Radiographic identification of bleeding vessels allows embolization with gelfoam, coils, or glue. Balloon occlusion is also a technique used in such circumstances. Embolization can be used for bleeding that continues after hysterectomy or can be used as an alternative to hysterectomy to preserve fertility.

Studies estimating the fertility and pregnancy outcomes after successful conservative treatment for placenta accrete have demonstrated placenta accreta does not appear to compromise the patients' subsequent fertility or obstetrical outcome.

By reviewing the literature, no prospective studies have specifically evaluated fertility, following uterine artery embolization during cesarean section due to placenta accrete .

Methods:

Women that were operated and fit inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in the study after getting advanced notice on requirements . After giving informed consent to participate in the study, demographic parameters and medical history will be taken, including - age , Body Mass Index ( BMI), parity, gravity, past medical history, past operations.

preoperative intra operative and post operative information will be collected.

All women participating will complete -

1. Day 2 blood sample for hormonal profile - follicle stimulating hormone ( FSH), estrogen (E2), progesterone (P)
2. Blood sample for anti mullarian hormon (AMH)
3. Vaginal ultrasound assessing antral follicle count (AFC)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fertility

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Post surgery and embolization

Blood sample for hormonal profile: estrogen , progesterone, anti mullarian hormone ( AMH) Vaginal ultrasound to estimate antral follicle count ( AFC)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vaginal ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Blood sample

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Control group

Blood sample for hormonal profile: estrogen , progesterone, anti mullarian hormone ( AMH) Vaginal ultrasound to estimate antral follicle count ( AFC)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vaginal ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Blood sample

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Post surgery with accreta without embolization

Blood sample for hormonal profile: estrogen , progesterone, anti mullarian hormone ( AMH) Vaginal ultrasound to estimate antral follicle count ( AFC)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vaginal ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Blood sample

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Post surgery without accreta without embolization

Blood sample for hormonal profile: estrogen , progesterone, anti mullarian hormone ( AMH)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Blood sample

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Normal Vaginal Delivery - no suspected accreta

Blood sample for hormonal profile: estrogen , progesterone, anti mullarian hormone ( AMH)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Blood sample

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vaginal ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Blood sample

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Study group

* S/P cesarean section with bilateral uterine arteries embolization.
* Age 18-42

Control group ( from IVF clinic)

* infertility treatment due to male factor
* Single patients for sperm donation
* Age 18-42

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \>42
* Hysterectomy due to the procedure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

42 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sheba Medical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Aya Mohr-Sasson

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aya Mohr Sasson

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sheba Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sheba Medical Center

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. The management and outcomes of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta in the UK: a population-based descriptive study. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):62-70; discussion 70-1. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12405. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23924326 (View on PubMed)

Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Sergienko R, Sheiner E. Placenta accreta: risk factors, perinatal outcomes, and consequences for subsequent births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):219.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.037. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23313722 (View on PubMed)

Balayla J, Bondarenko HD. Placenta accreta and the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Perinat Med. 2013 Mar;41(2):141-9. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0219.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23241664 (View on PubMed)

Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jul;66(1):89-92.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4011075 (View on PubMed)

Oyelese Y, Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;107(4):927-41. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000207559.15715.98.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16582134 (View on PubMed)

Vahanian SA, Lavery JA, Ananth CV, Vintzileos A. Placental implantation abnormalities and risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4 Suppl):S78-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.058.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26428506 (View on PubMed)

Rao KP, Belogolovkin V, Yankowitz J, Spinnato JA 2nd. Abnormal placentation: evidence-based diagnosis and management of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012 Aug;67(8):503-19. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182685870.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22926275 (View on PubMed)

Zaki ZM, Bahar AM, Ali ME, Albar HA, Gerais MA. Risk factors and morbidity in patients with placenta previa accreta compared to placenta previa non-accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Apr;77(4):391-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9598946 (View on PubMed)

Mohr-Sasson A, Haas J, Bar-Adon S, Shats M, Hochman R, Orvieto R, Mazaki-Tovi S, Sivan E. The Influence of Cesarean Delivery on Ovarian Reserve: a Prospective Cohort Study. Reprod Sci. 2022 Feb;29(2):639-645. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00730-z. Epub 2021 Sep 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34472035 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3178-16- SMC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.