Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction
NCT02942927
Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction
NCT02562352
Appropriate Polypharmacy in Older People in Primary Care
NCT04181879
The eDosette Pilot Study
NCT03513224
Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction (Pharmacy)
NCT03557944
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
According to the Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Efficacy, the beliefs a person holds regarding his or her power to influence situations strongly affects the agency a person has to face challenges capably. A tool such as an up-to-date MWC that has a list of the medications and dosages in addition to medical conditions listed may help older patients to better understand and manage their health. Furthermore, a wallet card has been an effective tool with many benefits. For example, a study showed that a Medication Allergy Profile card increased patient's knowledge of their drug regimens, decreased medication errors, decreased drug interactions, and improved patients' compliance.
No randomized control trials currently show the the impact of a medication wallet card/list on patient enablement. One study showed that a significant percentage of the patients were willing to use a self-maintained wallet-sized medication list. In addition, those who used the medication list showed an improved sense of knowledge about their medical problems and medication, and also exhibited an enhanced sense of responsibility in maintaining their medication lists. However, the study considered a relatively young population that only included patients over the age of 40 and did not stipulate a minimum number of medications for the patients to be taking. In addition, the study was not a randomized control trial, and used the Patient Medication Scale (PMS) to measure outcomes.
Hence, a randomized control trial employing a standardized questionnaires to investigate an older population (age greater than 70) experiencing polypharmacy is needed to asses the impact of a medical wallet card in promoting self efficacy and patient enablement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Wallet Card Group
The intervention arm is comprised of:
Patients from the TAPER study who receive a medication wallet card with their medications and medical conditions listed.
Medication Wallet Card
A medication wallet card will be given to the intervention group. This will be personalized for each patient and will include the patient's medications, dosages, and medical conditions. It will be personally given to a patient after a medical appointment with their family physician.
Control Group
Standard of care as well as wait list control. These participants will receive a "reminder" wallet card which states, "Remember to keep an up-to-date listing of your medications and bring your medications to your doctor's appointments."
Reminder Card
A reminder card will be given to this group. The card will not be personal and will be mailed to patients. It will state, "Remember to keep an up-to-date listing of your medications and bring your medications to your doctor's appointments."
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Medication Wallet Card
A medication wallet card will be given to the intervention group. This will be personalized for each patient and will include the patient's medications, dosages, and medical conditions. It will be personally given to a patient after a medical appointment with their family physician.
Reminder Card
A reminder card will be given to this group. The card will not be personal and will be mailed to patients. It will state, "Remember to keep an up-to-date listing of your medications and bring your medications to your doctor's appointments."
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participating family doctor as most responsible provider
* Patient of McMaster Family Health Team
* Currently taking 5 or more medications
* Have not had a recent comprehensive medication review
* Patient consents
Exclusion Criteria
* Terminal illness or other circumstance precluding 13 month study period
70 Years
116 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McMaster University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ainsley Moore, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McMaster University, Department of Family Medicine
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, Girosi F, Meili R, Scoville R, Taylor R. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):1103-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103.
Varkey P, Cunningham J, Bisping DS. Improving medication reconciliation in the outpatient setting. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 May;33(5):286-92. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33033-x.
Nassaralla CL, Naessens JM, Chaudhry R, Hansen MA, Scheitel SM. Implementation of a medication reconciliation process in an ambulatory internal medicine clinic. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):90-4. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021113.
Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Seger AC, Borus J, Burdick E, Poon EG, Leape LL, Bates DW. Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep;20(9):837-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0194.x.
Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
Klein GL, Zenk KE. A Medical Allergy Profile (MAP) card. Ann Allergy. 1981 Jun;46(6):328-30.
Chae SY, Chae MH, Isaacson N, James TS. The patient medication list: can we get patients more involved in their medical care? J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):677-85. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090059.
Hudon C, Fortin M, Rossignol F, Bernier S, Poitras ME. The Patient Enablement Instrument-French version in a family practice setting: a reliability study. BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jul 7;12:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-71.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TAPER-Wallet-Card-002-May-23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.