Effectiveness of a Medication Wallet Card

NCT ID: NCT02820129

Last Updated: 2021-09-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates whether or not the use of a medication wallet card in patients over 70 taking 5 or more medications promotes self-efficacy with regards to coping with illness, understanding medications, and staying healthy. Half of the participants will receive an individualized medication wallet card with their medications and medical conditions listed while the other half will receive a simple reminder card.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In order to prevent medication errors and subsequent ADEs, a complete and accurate medication list must be maintained. Although electronic healthcare records, maintained by healthcare providers, have been praised for their potential to decrease medication errors, studies show that the sole implementation of a paperless system is not sufficient to eliminate medication recording and prescription errors. Hence, an approach to maintain complete medication lists will need to involve the cooperation of both health care providers and patients. A previous study showed that an integrated approach including all members of the healthcare team and the patient improved the completeness and accuracy of medication list from 7.7% to 18.5%. One way to increase patient involvement in medication reconciliation is by allowing the patients to become more informed about their health and medications.

According to the Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Efficacy, the beliefs a person holds regarding his or her power to influence situations strongly affects the agency a person has to face challenges capably. A tool such as an up-to-date MWC that has a list of the medications and dosages in addition to medical conditions listed may help older patients to better understand and manage their health. Furthermore, a wallet card has been an effective tool with many benefits. For example, a study showed that a Medication Allergy Profile card increased patient's knowledge of their drug regimens, decreased medication errors, decreased drug interactions, and improved patients' compliance.

No randomized control trials currently show the the impact of a medication wallet card/list on patient enablement. One study showed that a significant percentage of the patients were willing to use a self-maintained wallet-sized medication list. In addition, those who used the medication list showed an improved sense of knowledge about their medical problems and medication, and also exhibited an enhanced sense of responsibility in maintaining their medication lists. However, the study considered a relatively young population that only included patients over the age of 40 and did not stipulate a minimum number of medications for the patients to be taking. In addition, the study was not a randomized control trial, and used the Patient Medication Scale (PMS) to measure outcomes.

Hence, a randomized control trial employing a standardized questionnaires to investigate an older population (age greater than 70) experiencing polypharmacy is needed to asses the impact of a medical wallet card in promoting self efficacy and patient enablement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Comorbidity Medication Therapy Management Polypharmacy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Wallet Card Group

The intervention arm is comprised of:

Patients from the TAPER study who receive a medication wallet card with their medications and medical conditions listed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Medication Wallet Card

Intervention Type DEVICE

A medication wallet card will be given to the intervention group. This will be personalized for each patient and will include the patient's medications, dosages, and medical conditions. It will be personally given to a patient after a medical appointment with their family physician.

Control Group

Standard of care as well as wait list control. These participants will receive a "reminder" wallet card which states, "Remember to keep an up-to-date listing of your medications and bring your medications to your doctor's appointments."

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Reminder Card

Intervention Type DEVICE

A reminder card will be given to this group. The card will not be personal and will be mailed to patients. It will state, "Remember to keep an up-to-date listing of your medications and bring your medications to your doctor's appointments."

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medication Wallet Card

A medication wallet card will be given to the intervention group. This will be personalized for each patient and will include the patient's medications, dosages, and medical conditions. It will be personally given to a patient after a medical appointment with their family physician.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reminder Card

A reminder card will be given to this group. The card will not be personal and will be mailed to patients. It will state, "Remember to keep an up-to-date listing of your medications and bring your medications to your doctor's appointments."

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Placebo Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 70 years of age or older
* Participating family doctor as most responsible provider
* Patient of McMaster Family Health Team
* Currently taking 5 or more medications
* Have not had a recent comprehensive medication review
* Patient consents

Exclusion Criteria

* English language or cognitive skills inadequate to understand and respond to rating scales
* Terminal illness or other circumstance precluding 13 month study period
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

116 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McMaster University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ainsley Moore, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster University, Department of Family Medicine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, Girosi F, Meili R, Scoville R, Taylor R. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):1103-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16162551 (View on PubMed)

Varkey P, Cunningham J, Bisping DS. Improving medication reconciliation in the outpatient setting. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 May;33(5):286-92. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33033-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17503684 (View on PubMed)

Nassaralla CL, Naessens JM, Chaudhry R, Hansen MA, Scheitel SM. Implementation of a medication reconciliation process in an ambulatory internal medicine clinic. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):90-4. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021113.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17403752 (View on PubMed)

Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Seger AC, Borus J, Burdick E, Poon EG, Leape LL, Bates DW. Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep;20(9):837-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0194.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16117752 (View on PubMed)

Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11148297 (View on PubMed)

Klein GL, Zenk KE. A Medical Allergy Profile (MAP) card. Ann Allergy. 1981 Jun;46(6):328-30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7247083 (View on PubMed)

Chae SY, Chae MH, Isaacson N, James TS. The patient medication list: can we get patients more involved in their medical care? J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):677-85. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090059.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19897697 (View on PubMed)

Hudon C, Fortin M, Rossignol F, Bernier S, Poitras ME. The Patient Enablement Instrument-French version in a family practice setting: a reliability study. BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jul 7;12:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-71.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21736729 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TAPER-Wallet-Card-002-May-23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.