Evaluation of Lymphadenectomy and Chemotherapy TIP on Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis
NCT ID: NCT02817958
Last Updated: 2025-06-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2
37 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-10-17
2028-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The management of inguinal areas is the cornerstone of penile cancer. It is curative in about 80% of patients with 1 or 2 inguinal metastases. 5-years overall survival was on average 85% for pN0 patients and 40% for pN+ patients. For pN+ patients, 5-year overall survival was 70 to 80% for pN1 (only 1 lymph node invasion), 30 to 40% for pN2, and 0 to 10% for pN3.
The risk of local recurrence is 5-10% for pN0 and 20-30% for pN+ after local treatment by lymphadenectomy alone without chemotherapy. The average time to recurrence was 10 months. Disease-free survival at 5 years is 75-85% for pN0 and 30-45% for pN+. Its indication depends on clinical examination (presence or absence of lymph nodes palpated) and the risk of nodal disease (≥pT1bG2).
Currently, a fine needle biopsy is the best clinical diagnosis method because it is a simple, low risk, and possible in consultation. When the result is positive, it allows an early dissection. Single or double fine needle biopsy will be used in cN+ patients. For patients at risk of lymp nodes involvement (cN0 and ≥pT1B or G2), the sentinel node diagnosis may be followed by modified or bilateral lymphadenectomy.
Although lymphadenectomy alone has a curator action, it sometimes remains insufficient in patients with metastatic lymph node involvement. Therefore it seems important to develop a multimodal approach in the management of these patients in order to increase the response rate to treatment and survival.
From a Phase II trial conducted on 30 patients, the combination TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin) appears to have an efficacy / toxicity acceptable.
The TIP protocol has therefore been chosen for this trial as adjuvant or neo-adjuvant treatment in patients with high risk of lymph nodes involvement (cN0 and ≥pT1B or G2), and with inguinal mobile palpated lymph nodes (cN+) respectively, after lymph nodes involvement proven (pN+).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Penile Cancer
NCT05887921
Lymph Node Involvement Using Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT02156414
Prediction of Local Recurrence and Its Impact on Long-term Outcomes After Low-risk Glans-sparing Surgery for Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT06565585
A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Implementation of Shared Decision Making Strategy for Renal Cell Cancer (RCC)
NCT05548621
Evaluation of Sentinel Node Policy in Early Stage Endometrial Carcinomas at Intermediate and High Risk of Recurrence.
NCT02598219
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
B-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy TIP
fine needle biopsy or sentinel node + neoadjuvant chemotherapy TIP followed by a lymphadenectomy modified bilateral lymphadenectomy 4 cycles every 21 days
Chemotherapy TIP
Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin
A-Adjuvant Chemotherapy TIP
Lymphadenectomy (+/- sentinel node) + adjuvant chemotherapy TIP modified bilateral lymphadenectomy 4 cycles every 21 days
Chemotherapy TIP
Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Chemotherapy TIP
Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Mobile palpated lymph nodes (stage cN1 and cN2) whatever the T stage, Or If no palpated lymph nodes (cN0), patients with nodes involvement risk ≥pT1b and / or Grade 2,
3. Metastatic lymph node involvement,
4. Patients M0 or Mx,
5. Age ≥18 ans,
6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1,
7. Leucocytes ≥1.5 g/L,
8. Hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL,
9. Platelets ≥100 000/mm³,
10. Normal calcemia and kaliemia,
11. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN) ; total bilirubin ≤1.5 ULN (3 ULN in case of Gilbert disease); alkaline phosphatase (ALP) \<2 ULN,
12. Creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min (MDRD method),
13. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \>50%,
14. Patients having received, read the information note and signed consent,
15. Reproductive age patients agreeing to use two methods of birth control (one for the patient and one for the partner) for the duration of the study and for 6 months after the last dose of treatment,
16. Patients able to comply with the protocol requirements (scheduled visits, treatment plan, clinical, paraclinical, biological and other procedures of the Protocol),
17. Patients undergoing a social security scheme.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Iliac lymph nodes (cN3),
3. Patients pN3,
4. prior chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis,
5. Against-indication for chemotherapy or known hypersensitivity to cisplatin, ifosfamide or paclitaxel,
6. Patients treated with phenytoin,
7. Patients with hearing loss \>Grade 1 (CTCAE V4.03),
8. Patients with cardiopulmonary disease-indicating against overhydration,
9. History of cancer within 5 years prior to inclusion in the trial other than cutaneous basal cell,
10. Patient received a live attenuated vaccine within 30 days prior to inclusion,
11. Patients already included in another clinical trial or receiving an experimental treatment within 30 days prior to inclusion in the trial,
12. Patients deprived of their liberty or under court protection including guardianship,
13. Severe systemic disease or uncontrolled or any other chronic or acute illness that is incompatible with the patient's participation in the trial according to investigator,
14. immunocompromised patients including with known seropositivity (HIV),
15. Patients with mental impairment which prevents the understanding of the protocol or having a psychological state, family, sociological or geographical conditions that would not allow compliance with the protocol and the planned follow-up or any condition which, according to the investigator, would prevent participation patient tested. These conditions should be assessed before inclusion of patients.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute, France
OTHER_GOV
UNICANCER
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jérôme Rigaud, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nantes University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ICO-Paul Papin
Angers, , France
Chr Besancon
Besançon, , France
Hôpital SAINT ANDRE
Bordeaux, , France
Centre FRANCOIS BACLESSE
Caen, , France
Chru Gabriel Montpied
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Ch de Limoges
Limoges, , France
Centre Leon Berard
Lyon, , France
Chu Lyon Sud
Lyon, , France
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Marseille, , France
Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine
Nancy, , France
Clinique Urologique- Chu Hotel Dieu
Nantes, , France
Institut de Cancerologie Du Gard - Centre Oncogard
Nîmes, , France
Hopital Saint Louis
Paris, , France
Chu de Rouen
Rouen, , France
ICO-René Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain, , France
Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, , France
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UC-0160/1406
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
AFU-GETUG 25
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2014-004678-41
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.