A Cost-Effective Handheld Breast Scanner for Use in Low Resource Environments: A Validation Study
NCT ID: NCT02814292
Last Updated: 2016-06-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
89 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-06-30
2015-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Utility of a Low-Cost Hand-Held Breast Scanner
NCT02762565
Clinical Utility Study of a Low-Cost Hand-Held Breast Scanner
NCT02597452
The Study on the Clinical Utility of Liquid Biopsy in Breast Cancer
NCT02902991
Exploring the Efficacy and Feasibility of the LymphaTech Scanner for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Screening
NCT03861975
Detecting Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Cell Free DNA (cfDNA) in Peripheral Blood of Breast Cancer (BC) Patients to Develop the Clinical Application for Early Detection and Diagnostics
NCT03511859
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Target enrollment is up to 100 patients to verify that the investigators have reproducible values in the same patient. Each breast will be evaluated and compared against each other whether it is considered normal or abnormal tissue. Data from patients both normal and abnormal regions will be compared and used to determine predictive value and accuracy in this prototype. The patient population will be women and men 18 years of age or older with symptomatic breast lump either by palpation or imaging.
Symptomatic individuals scheduled to undergo diagnostic exam will be recruited from all patients presenting for breast evaluations at Dr. Brooks clinical practices who meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Consent will be obtained prior to any study related activities. The PEFS evaluation will be performed by a trained individual. Subjects will be scanned in supine position without breast immobilization - similar to ultrasound testing. The PEFS data is recorded and processed by an automated software algorithm and the results are displayed topographically on a breast-map with red areas showing positive findings and black areas showing negative findings. Quantitative data will be documented and analyzed for accuracy metrics. Results will not be given to subjects nor recorded in their medical records. Because this study is not a clinical utility study, results will have no effect on clinical care decisions. The PEFS evaluation may add between 10 and 30 minutes to the clinic visit. No imaging or pathology tests are being done for research purposes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* women or men with symptomatic breast lump by palpation or imaging
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UE LifeSciences Inc.
INDUSTRY
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Broach RB, Geha R, Englander BS, DeLaCruz L, Thrash H, Brooks AD. A cost-effective handheld breast scanner for use in low-resource environments: a validation study. World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct 28;14(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1022-2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
819121
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.