RADAR1- Trial of a New Blood Sample Method (Remote Arthritis Disease Activity MonitoR)
NCT ID: NCT02809547
Last Updated: 2018-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-30
2017-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis. An Investigation of Wholebody MRI, Conventional MRI, CT and Circulating Biomarkers
NCT01029613
Assess Structural Damage in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Biomarkers and Radiography
NCT01476956
An MRI-guided Treatment Strategy to Prevent Disease Progression in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT01656278
Laser-based Photoacoustic Tomography of Human Inflammatory Arthritis
NCT00748254
Use of Remote Monitoring by Smartphone in the Care Management of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT03005925
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Being able to reliably define and report a disease 'flare' in arthritis is currently problematic as there are no objective measures available to the patient while at home. The clear definition of a flare, as determined through blood testing would help justify an increase in immunosuppressant dose or a course of steroids. Currently, patients make a visit to their GP or hospital clinic, at 6 week intervals at best. In reality, this means that opportunities to monitor CRP during an active 'flare' are often missed and an informed intervention (medication adjustments) is not possible. Home monitoring is constrained by the costs of making phlebotomists available to make frequent home visits to patients. Also for markers which are unstable at ambient temperatures, blood samples need to be refrigerated and rapidly transported to the laboratory for analysis.
Thus the ability for the patient to collect their own blood samples in their own home and send these at ambient temperature to a laboratory would enable 'remote' and timely monitoring of chronic disease. The investigators have recently completed an Arthritis Research UK funded clinical study that demonstrated that a number of clinically relevant proteins related to flares (i.e.?) were reliably collected, stored for less than three months and extracted from dried blood spots (n=20 arthritis patients). The paper cards used to collect blood droplets were pre-treated to stabilise proteins and minimise haemolysis contamination (caused by bursting and breakdown of red blood cells). Our results across 20 arthritis patients revealed that 90% recovery rates can be achieved from dried blood spot sample (DBSS) stored at room temperature for 3 month (relative to a matched -20'C frozen plasma sample). The inflammation marker proteins included C-reactive protein (CRP), tumour necrosis factor alpha and Immunoglobulin G. Without pre-treatment of the DBSS paper, only 53% of these proteins are recovered.
For the patient, use of DBSS means that GP and hospital visits to take blood and carry out tests could be reduced. With minimal training, samples would be obtained simply at home by the patient, over a six week period and then transported at room temperature using conventional post. Proteins could then be analysed at a central lab. In the future, the technology could accompany patient assessments of disease activity and complement ongoing studies focused on wearable sensors to measure joint movement and stiffness (UU Data-glove project).
For the hospital trust, use of this novel technology could obviate the need for patients to attend the clinic for blood sampling. Soon after prescribing a new treatment, clinicians could use DBSS to monitor treatment efficacy in reducing inflammation. This technology therefore offers an earlier opportunity than currently available to titre dosage and switch from ineffective drugs or treatments associated with adverse events. Furthermore, feedback of the monitoring information provided by DBSS could be given to the patient, via for example smartphone application, and has the potential to improve adherence to treatment plans.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
In Clinic monitoring
70 method comparison patients who represent a C-reactive protein (CRP) reference range and have retrievable study outcome measures will have a whole blood sample and DBSS taken at recruitment and at a routine six week review.
Dried Blood Spot device
At Home monitoring
30 Prospective patients will provide (i) one whole blood sample and one set of dried blood spot samples (DBSS) at recruitment, (ii) a set of DBSS once a week for six weeks from recruitment, with a matched whole blood sample at six week appointment, (iii) two extra sets of DBSS to be taken during a flare and 24 hours after (iv) 6 prospective patients will have daily hand movement data collected for 5 minutes on each occasion using a provided data glove.
Dried Blood Spot device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dried Blood Spot device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Ulster
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northern Ireland Centre for Stratified Medicine/ Altnagelvin Hopsital
Londonderry, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
D'Cruz LG, McEleney KG, Cochrane C, Tan KBC, Shukla P, Gardiner PV, Small D, Zhang SD, Gibson DS. Assessment of a dried blood spot C-reactive protein method to identify disease flares in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77826-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16/0019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.