Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
18 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-09-16
2020-12-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasonography in Hemophilic Joint Disease and Serum Markers
NCT02634918
Sonography and Haemophilia
NCT04550988
Joint Status in Subjects With Severe Hemophilia A in Relation to Different Treatment Regimens
NCT00927667
Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) for Home Use in Hemophilia
NCT04131920
Impact on French Physician's Haemophilia Treatment Management Decision Based on Systematic Joint Examination
NCT04133883
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The initiation of and adherence to a prophylactic infusion regimen, starting with the first or second joint bleed, is essential for prevention of progression to arthropathy.
Studies have demonstrated that prophylaxis with recombinant or plasma-derived factor VIII or IX concentrates is effective in preventing clinical joint bleeds and the progression to debilitating joint disease in patients with severe hemophilia A or B respectively. However, for patients on prophylaxis, the absence of symptomatic joint bleeds and/or structural and functional abnormalities of joints on physical examination and plain radiographic images can lead to the erroneous assumption that the prophylaxis is completely effective. It has been established that patients with severe hemophilia are still at risk for subclinical bleeding ("microbleeds") despite seemingly adequate prophylaxis.
Young adults, despite a lifetime on prophylaxis and apparently normal joints are developing arthropathy in their 20's and 30's. Prophylaxis as currently practiced may only be delaying the onset of clinical joint disease.
The recent advancements in ultrasound imaging (US) have been proven to be effective in confirming a joint bleed, monitoring the evolution of a joint bleed and assessing the resolution or recurrence of a bleed. Previous studies have evaluated the prevalence of subclinical arthropathy in young hemophilic adults using both US and MRI techniques and concluded that US is as effective and sensitive as MRI identifying these subclinical joint abnormalities.
However, to the investigators' knowledge, no prior studies have used US technique over an extended period of time to monitor the natural evolution of joint arthropathy in children with hemophilia who are adherent to an established prophylaxis regimen and have no evidence of clinical joint compromise.
The seminal Joint Outcome Study, which confirmed the role of prophylaxis in preventing overt clinical joint disease, mandated a trough residual factor VIII level of 1%. While this trough level significantly decreased overt hemarthroses and joint damage, the evidence suggestive of microbleeds raised a question as to the protection afforded by such a low trough level. Intuitively it would seem as if a higher trough level should confer greater protection against microbleeds, and result in more sustainable joint health. The "ideal" protective trough, has not been established.
The investigators' hypothesis is that US is a valuable imaging technique to monitor the natural evolution of hemophilic arthropathy in children with severe hemophilia A or B who are undergoing prophylaxis regimen and do not manifest clinical evidence of hemophilic arthropathy.
Through this observational study, the investigators will provide valuable information in regards the prevalence, progression and severity of joint abnormalities. The use of US to detect microbleeds before the cumulative damaging effects demonstrable by MRI, will also allow tailoring of treatment and the implementation of new prophylaxis strategies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Severe Hemophilia A or B
Medical history, physical exam, vital signs,physical therapist targeted exam and ultrasound joint assessment (ankles and knees) every 6 months.
MRI joint assessment (knees and ankles) at End of Trial Visit (Month 60).
Ankle and Knee Ultrasound Joint Assessment
Ultrasound Examination of the ankles and knees
Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mild/Moderate Hemophilia A or B
Medical history, physical exam, vital signs,physical therapist targeted exam and ultrasound joint assessment (ankles and knees) every year.
MRI joint assessment (knees and ankles) at End of Trial Visit (Month 60).
Ankle and Knee Ultrasound Joint Assessment
Ultrasound Examination of the ankles and knees
Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ankle and Knee Ultrasound Joint Assessment
Ultrasound Examination of the ankles and knees
Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Mild/moderate Hemophilia Cohort:Patients from 0 up to 30 months of age with diagnosis of mild hemophilia A or B defined as a factor VIII:C/IX:C of 5-50% and those with diagnosis of moderate hemophilia A or B defined a s a factor VIII:C/IX:C of 1-5% without evidence (clinical or by history) of target joint disease and no history of spontaneous joint bleeds.
Exclusion Criteria
* Present or prior history of anti FVIII or IX inhibitors.
* Known inflammatory joint disease.
* Established target joint.
30 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shire
INDUSTRY
University of Miami
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fernando F. Corrales-Medina
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fernando F. Corrales-Medina, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Miami
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
The University of Miami - Department of Pediatrics
Miami, Florida, United States
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Tulane
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Berntorp E. Joint outcomes in patients with haemophilia: the importance of adherence to preventive regimens. Haemophilia. 2009 Nov;15(6):1219-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02077.x. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, Riske B, Hacker MR, Kilcoyne R, Ingram JD, Manco-Johnson ML, Funk S, Jacobson L, Valentino LA, Hoots WK, Buchanan GR, DiMichele D, Recht M, Brown D, Leissinger C, Bleak S, Cohen A, Mathew P, Matsunaga A, Medeiros D, Nugent D, Thomas GA, Thompson AA, McRedmond K, Soucie JM, Austin H, Evatt BL. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 9;357(6):535-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067659.
Martinoli C, Della Casa Alberighi O, Di Minno G, Graziano E, Molinari AC, Pasta G, Russo G, Santagostino E, Tagliaferri A, Tagliafico A, Morfini M. Development and definition of a simplified scanning procedure and scoring method for Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US). Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jun;109(6):1170-9. doi: 10.1160/TH12-11-0874. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
Sierra Aisa C, Lucia Cuesta JF, Rubio Martinez A, Fernandez Mosteirin N, Iborra Munoz A, Abio Calvete M, Guillen Gomez M, Moreto Quintana A, Rubio Felix D. Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and follow-up of joint lesions in patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2014 Jan;20(1):e51-7. doi: 10.1111/hae.12268. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
Di Minno MN, Iervolino S, Soscia E, Tosetto A, Coppola A, Schiavulli M, Marrone E, Ruosi C, Salvatore M, Di Minno G. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation of "healthy" joints in young subjects with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia. 2013 May;19(3):e167-73. doi: 10.1111/hae.12107. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
Doria AS. State-of-the-art imaging techniques for the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy: present and future. Haemophilia. 2010 Jul;16 Suppl 5:107-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02307.x.
Muca-Perja M, Riva S, Grochowska B, Mangiafico L, Mago D, Gringeri A. Ultrasonography of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia. 2012 May;18(3):364-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02672.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20151156
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.