The Hemophilia Ultrasound Project

NCT ID: NCT02807753

Last Updated: 2021-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-16

Study Completion Date

2020-12-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the prevalence of subclinical arthropathy in children with severe hemophilia undergoing a prophylaxis regimen and without evidence of target joints, using a validated ultrasound scoring method.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Persons with Hemophilia (A or B) often experience recurrent joint bleeds, most commonly affecting the ankles, knees and elbows. These bleeds can lead to significant pain and disability over time. If recurrent joint bleeds are not managed with prompt and adequate infusions of factor concentrate, the damage caused by the presence of blood in the joint space will eventually result in a condition called debilitating chronic hemophilic arthropathy.

The initiation of and adherence to a prophylactic infusion regimen, starting with the first or second joint bleed, is essential for prevention of progression to arthropathy.

Studies have demonstrated that prophylaxis with recombinant or plasma-derived factor VIII or IX concentrates is effective in preventing clinical joint bleeds and the progression to debilitating joint disease in patients with severe hemophilia A or B respectively. However, for patients on prophylaxis, the absence of symptomatic joint bleeds and/or structural and functional abnormalities of joints on physical examination and plain radiographic images can lead to the erroneous assumption that the prophylaxis is completely effective. It has been established that patients with severe hemophilia are still at risk for subclinical bleeding ("microbleeds") despite seemingly adequate prophylaxis.

Young adults, despite a lifetime on prophylaxis and apparently normal joints are developing arthropathy in their 20's and 30's. Prophylaxis as currently practiced may only be delaying the onset of clinical joint disease.

The recent advancements in ultrasound imaging (US) have been proven to be effective in confirming a joint bleed, monitoring the evolution of a joint bleed and assessing the resolution or recurrence of a bleed. Previous studies have evaluated the prevalence of subclinical arthropathy in young hemophilic adults using both US and MRI techniques and concluded that US is as effective and sensitive as MRI identifying these subclinical joint abnormalities.

However, to the investigators' knowledge, no prior studies have used US technique over an extended period of time to monitor the natural evolution of joint arthropathy in children with hemophilia who are adherent to an established prophylaxis regimen and have no evidence of clinical joint compromise.

The seminal Joint Outcome Study, which confirmed the role of prophylaxis in preventing overt clinical joint disease, mandated a trough residual factor VIII level of 1%. While this trough level significantly decreased overt hemarthroses and joint damage, the evidence suggestive of microbleeds raised a question as to the protection afforded by such a low trough level. Intuitively it would seem as if a higher trough level should confer greater protection against microbleeds, and result in more sustainable joint health. The "ideal" protective trough, has not been established.

The investigators' hypothesis is that US is a valuable imaging technique to monitor the natural evolution of hemophilic arthropathy in children with severe hemophilia A or B who are undergoing prophylaxis regimen and do not manifest clinical evidence of hemophilic arthropathy.

Through this observational study, the investigators will provide valuable information in regards the prevalence, progression and severity of joint abnormalities. The use of US to detect microbleeds before the cumulative damaging effects demonstrable by MRI, will also allow tailoring of treatment and the implementation of new prophylaxis strategies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemophilia A Hemophilia B

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Severe Hemophilia A or B

Medical history, physical exam, vital signs,physical therapist targeted exam and ultrasound joint assessment (ankles and knees) every 6 months.

MRI joint assessment (knees and ankles) at End of Trial Visit (Month 60).

Ankle and Knee Ultrasound Joint Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ultrasound Examination of the ankles and knees

Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Mild/Moderate Hemophilia A or B

Medical history, physical exam, vital signs,physical therapist targeted exam and ultrasound joint assessment (ankles and knees) every year.

MRI joint assessment (knees and ankles) at End of Trial Visit (Month 60).

Ankle and Knee Ultrasound Joint Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ultrasound Examination of the ankles and knees

Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ankle and Knee Ultrasound Joint Assessment

Ultrasound Examination of the ankles and knees

Intervention Type OTHER

Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Ankle and Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Severe Hemophilia Cohort:Patients from 0 up to 30 months of age with diagnosis of severe hemophilia A or B defined as a factor VIII:C/IX:C of \<1% undergoing prophylaxis regimen with any factor VIII or IX concentrate and without evidence (clinical or by history) of target joint disease.
* Mild/moderate Hemophilia Cohort:Patients from 0 up to 30 months of age with diagnosis of mild hemophilia A or B defined as a factor VIII:C/IX:C of 5-50% and those with diagnosis of moderate hemophilia A or B defined a s a factor VIII:C/IX:C of 1-5% without evidence (clinical or by history) of target joint disease and no history of spontaneous joint bleeds.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with concomitant Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C and HIV viral infections (because of a recognized arthritogen effect).
* Present or prior history of anti FVIII or IX inhibitors.
* Known inflammatory joint disease.
* Established target joint.
Maximum Eligible Age

30 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shire

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Miami

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fernando F. Corrales-Medina

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fernando F. Corrales-Medina, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Miami

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

The University of Miami - Department of Pediatrics

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Tulane

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Berntorp E. Joint outcomes in patients with haemophilia: the importance of adherence to preventive regimens. Haemophilia. 2009 Nov;15(6):1219-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02077.x. Epub 2009 Jul 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19659939 (View on PubMed)

Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, Riske B, Hacker MR, Kilcoyne R, Ingram JD, Manco-Johnson ML, Funk S, Jacobson L, Valentino LA, Hoots WK, Buchanan GR, DiMichele D, Recht M, Brown D, Leissinger C, Bleak S, Cohen A, Mathew P, Matsunaga A, Medeiros D, Nugent D, Thomas GA, Thompson AA, McRedmond K, Soucie JM, Austin H, Evatt BL. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 9;357(6):535-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067659.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17687129 (View on PubMed)

Martinoli C, Della Casa Alberighi O, Di Minno G, Graziano E, Molinari AC, Pasta G, Russo G, Santagostino E, Tagliaferri A, Tagliafico A, Morfini M. Development and definition of a simplified scanning procedure and scoring method for Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US). Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jun;109(6):1170-9. doi: 10.1160/TH12-11-0874. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23571706 (View on PubMed)

Sierra Aisa C, Lucia Cuesta JF, Rubio Martinez A, Fernandez Mosteirin N, Iborra Munoz A, Abio Calvete M, Guillen Gomez M, Moreto Quintana A, Rubio Felix D. Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and follow-up of joint lesions in patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2014 Jan;20(1):e51-7. doi: 10.1111/hae.12268. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24112687 (View on PubMed)

Di Minno MN, Iervolino S, Soscia E, Tosetto A, Coppola A, Schiavulli M, Marrone E, Ruosi C, Salvatore M, Di Minno G. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation of "healthy" joints in young subjects with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia. 2013 May;19(3):e167-73. doi: 10.1111/hae.12107. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23496145 (View on PubMed)

Doria AS. State-of-the-art imaging techniques for the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy: present and future. Haemophilia. 2010 Jul;16 Suppl 5:107-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02307.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20590865 (View on PubMed)

Muca-Perja M, Riva S, Grochowska B, Mangiafico L, Mago D, Gringeri A. Ultrasonography of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia. 2012 May;18(3):364-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02672.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21999202 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20151156

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Joint Outcome Study
NCT00207597 COMPLETED