Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
83 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-30
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Double Pad Fiber Optic Device Versus Conventional Phototherapy
NCT04585828
Light-emitting Diodes (LED) Phototherapy for Hyperbilirubinemia of Term Newborn
NCT01136577
Broad Band Emission LED Phototherapy Source Versus Narrow Band
NCT05257369
Comparison of Phototherapy Using Neolight Skylife Versus Standardized Phototherapy for Hyperbilirubinemia in Newborns
NCT03599258
White Reflective Drape in Phototherapy for Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia
NCT07156721
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hyperbilirubinemia gets severe for 2 - 6 % of infants born at term or late preterm, which means, they need treatment to prevent ABE and the treatment of choice is phototherapy due to its efficacy and safety. Hereby bilirubin in the skin and plasma is converted to photobilirubins; they are water-soluble and can be excreted through the liver without conjugation. They are presumably non-toxic. In most departments, single phototherapy is first choice. To avoid the above-mentioned damaging condition, it is very important to optimize phototherapy.
Former fluorescent tubes were used as light source, but now light emission diodes (LED) are used.
This study investigates whether double phototherapy reduces total serum bilirubin faster than single light during intensive phototherapy, using LED, and whether there is an upper limit for the efficacy of phototherapy.
It is a prospective, randomised controlled study. The infants will be randomized to either 1: Conventional phototherapy with blue LED light from above and a distance from light source to mattress of 30 cm, giving a light irradiance of 66 µW/cm2/nm or 2: Conventional phototherapy combined with a light blanket (Bilisoft) with a light irradiance by the skin of 39 µW/cm2/nm. TsB will be measured at start and after 12 - and 24 h of treatment. Based on the calculation of strength 72 infants will be needed in this study. As statistical methods t-tests will be used and multiple linear regression models will be used to adjust for confounding.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Double light
High-intensity phototherapy with blue LED light from above combined with a fiber optic, blue LED blanket from below.
Intervention: Light irradiance: 66 µW/cm2/nm + 39 µW/cm2/nm
Light irradiance
Comparison of double vs. single phototherapy
Single light
High-intensity phototherapy with blue LED light from above. Intervention: Light irradiance: 66 µW/cm2/nm
Light irradiance
Comparison of double vs. single phototherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Light irradiance
Comparison of double vs. single phototherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* gestational age ≥33 weeks
* birth weight ≥1800 g
* The infants should be treatable in a cradle
Exclusion Criteria
1 Day
14 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aalborg University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mette L Roed, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aalborg University Hospital
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
N-20140010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.