Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-02-27
2018-02-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Direct electrical stimulation (DES) at surgery allows assessment of eloquent function directly from the brain surface (invasive) and is considered the gold standard in brain mapping. Therefore, in order to determine the true clinical applicability of the non-invasive mapping technologies, this study proposes to assess the predictive value of functional MRI (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) for sensorimotor and language functions by comparing results to DES and determine whether fMRI or MEG provides the most consistent and accurate information. The rationale for the proposed research is that understanding the reliability of our current technology will allow us to perform safer surgeries and to preserve neurologic function.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Eloquent Function in Brain Tumor Patients
NCT01535430
Presurgical Planning With Functional MRI (fMRI) Mapping of Motor Cortex in Patients With Cerebral Tumors
NCT00724737
MRI and Diffusion Imaging of Eloquent Brain Areas to Optimize Brain Tumor Resection Planning
NCT01534104
Neurosurgical Neuronavigation Using Resting State MRI and Machine Learning
NCT05864976
Genetic and Molecular Characterization of Nervous System Lesions
NCT06314607
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Direct electrical stimulation (DES) at the time of surgery allows assessment of eloquent function directly from the brain surface (invasive) and is considered the gold standard in brain mapping. Therefore, in order to determine the true clinical applicability of the non-invasive mapping technologies, this study proposes to: (1) assess the predictive value of fMRI and MEG for sensorimotor and language functions by comparing their results to DES and (2) determine whether fMRI or MEG provides the most consistent and accurate information. These aims will be accomplished by by co-registering all mapping data (invasive and non-invasive) in a modifiable 3D rendering. In this way, the DES to fMRI and MEG can be evaluated as well as fMRI to MEG compared. The rationale for the proposed research is that understanding the reliability of our current technology will allow for safer surgeries and preservation of neurologic function. The expected outcomes for the work proposed in Aims 1 and 2 are identification of a predictive value for fMRI and MEG and determination if one modality should be utilized over the other pre-operatively for the most accurate information. The results of this study are expected to have an important positive impact because identification of accurate pre-operative non-invasive mapping modalities will allow tailored testing and possibly lead to negation of the need for intra-operative mapping in certain cases. It will also enhance patient outcomes by improving patient safety. Furthermore, it will serve as the basis for a multi-institutional mapping data bank.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
brain mapping
pre-operative and intra-operative brain mapping to identify eloquent areas
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age equal to or greater than 19 years
* gender: male and female included
* brain tumor in or near an eloquent area of the brain that requires surgery
* benign or malignant intra-axial brain tumor
* primary or secondary intra-axial brain tumor
* appropriate body habitus for operating room positioning and airway protection for awake mapping
* appropriate mental status and capacity to participate with invasive or non-invasive mapping
Exclusion Criteria
* inappropriate body habitus for safe positioning or airway protection
* no capacity to understand the study the study or consent to it
* significant disability precluding successful mapping
* positive pregnancy test in females
* end stage renal disease or severe renal dysfunction
* sleep apnea or any obstructive airway disease
* severe anxiety disorder
* metabolic encephalopathy
19 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Nebraska
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michele R Aizenberg Ansari, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Nebraska
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0176-16-EP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.