Comparison of 3 Techniques for Recreation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomic Footprint
NCT ID: NCT02795247
Last Updated: 2024-04-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-08-26
2023-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Femoral Tunnel Position on Conventional MRI After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-Transtibial Technique Versus Transportal Technique
NCT01513434
Study of the Isometry of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament From the Center of the Native MRI Insertion Reported on Dynamic Scanner
NCT06996145
The Best Method for ACL Reconstruction.
NCT03192761
Effect of Tunnel Placements on Clinical and MRI Findings Two Years After ACL Reconstruction With DB Technique
NCT02000258
Anatomic and Biomechanical Investigation on ACL: A Cadaveric Study
NCT04957797
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transtibial Technique
Reconstruction of the ACL using the transtibial technique.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Hybrid Transtibial Technique
Reconstruction of the ACL using the hybrid transtibial technique
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Accessory Anteromedial Portal Technique
Reconstruction of the ACL using the accessory anteromedial portal technique
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Skeletally mature patients
* Patients who are able and willing to receive post-operative CT imaging of the affected knee
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous ACL injury or reconstruction in the contralateral kneeConcomitant non-ACL ligament reconstruction or osteotomy
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dana P Piasecki, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
OrthoCarolina Sports Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Robin BN, Jani SS, Marvil SC, Reid JB, Schillhammer CK, Lubowitz JH. Advantages and Disadvantages of Transtibial, Anteromedial Portal, and Outside-In Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul;31(7):1412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
Youm YS, Cho SD, Eo J, Lee KJ, Jung KH, Cha JR. 3D CT analysis of femoral and tibial tunnel positions after modified transtibial single bundle ACL reconstruction with varus and internal rotation of the tibia. Knee. 2013 Aug;20(4):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.024. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S, Chang CB, Park YK, Jo H, Kim CH. Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2007 Jul;23(7):771-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.04.016.
Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R. The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Aug;18(8):1013-37. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0964-0. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Takeda Y, Iwame T, Takasago T, Kondo K, Goto T, Fujii K, Naruse A. Comparison of tunnel orientation between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
de Abreu-e-Silva GM, de Oliveira MH, Maranhao GS, Deligne Lde M, Pfeilsticker RM, Novais EN, Nunes TA, de Andrade MA. Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):770-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2703-9. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
Larson AI, Bullock DP, Pevny T. Comparison of 4 femoral tunnel drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2012 Jul;28(7):972-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.12.015. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
Osaki K, Okazaki K, Matsubara H, Kuwashima U, Murakami K, Iwamoto Y. Asymmetry in Femoral Tunnel Socket Length During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Transportal, Outside-In, and Modified Transtibial Techniques. Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec;31(12):2365-70. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.026. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T. Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg. 1997 Winter;10(1):14-21; discussion 21-2.
Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK, Martins CA, Anderst W, Tashman S, Fu FH. The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jun;92(6):1418-26. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00654.
Sohn OJ, Lee DC, Park KH, Ahn HS. Comparison of the Modified Transtibial Technique, Anteromedial Portal Technique and Outside-in Technique in ACL Reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2014 Dec;26(4):241-8. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.4.241. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
Trofa DP, Saltzman BM, Corpus KT, Connor PM, Fleischli JE, Piasecki DP. A Hybrid Transtibial Technique Combines the Advantages of Anteromedial Portal and Transtibial Approaches: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Nov;48(13):3200-3207. doi: 10.1177/0363546520956645. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SPORT037
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.