Comparison of Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure or Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
NCT ID: NCT02787525
Last Updated: 2017-01-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-07-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A questionnaire is sent to the patients and if there is some information missing or unclear, the investigators will contact the patient or the treating physicians to get the missing/unclear information.
The study population consists of 500 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent LAAC between the years 2009 and 2014 in two centers (the Bern University hospital und Zurich University hospital) and a similar group of 500 patients with non-valvular AF treated with oral anticoagulation (OAC).
In order to compare the two groups and reducing the bias due to confounding variables, a propensity score matching will be performed.
Study hypothesis is that left atrial appendage closure is non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety in comparison to lifelong oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Interventional Strategies in Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Catheter Ablation
NCT01363895
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
NCT05976685
Comparison of LAA-Closure vs Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With NVAF and Status Post Intracranial Bleeding.
NCT04298723
Feasibility and Prognosis of Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation
NCT04472871
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus New Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
NCT03108872
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
LAAC seems at the actual knowledge to be a valid alternative to OAC. The objective of this study is to compare intermedium-term clinical outcomes, including thromboembolic events and bleeding complications between patients receiving Amplatzer devices vs. propensity score matched patients treated with OAC.
A questionnaire is sent to the patients asking about thrombo-embolic events, stroke, death, any bleeding but also on their current medication, comorbidities (i.e. arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal impairment and liver disease), any hospitalizations and their quality of life. If there is some information missing or unclear, the investigators will contact the patient or the treating physicians to get the missing information.
The study is an investigator-initiated, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. The study population consists of 500 patients with non-valvular AF who underwent LAAC between the years 2009 and 2014 in two centers (the Bern University hospital und Zurich University hospital) and a propensity score matched patients group of 500 patients with non-valvular AF treated with OAC.
Covariates for matching will be age, gender, renal function, coronary artery disease and its status of revascularization, left-ventricular function, HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc-Score.
Study hypothesis is that left atrial appendage closure is non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety in comparison to lifelong oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A: patients on anticoagulation
Questionnaire to patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation on OAC or NOAC
Questionnaire
A clinical sweep follow up will be performed in all patients of both groups and results will be analyzed. It will be in form of a standardized questionnaire and if necessary telephone interviews asking about thrombo-embolic events, stroke, death, any bleeding but also on their current medication, comorbidities (i.e. arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal impairment and liver disease), any hospitalizations and their quality of life. For all events, the source documents will be gathered from general physicians, cardiologists, hospitals or registry offices.
The questionnaire will be sent by mail to the patients. If information is missing or unclear, patients and if necessary their treating physician will be contacted by phone.
B: patients treated by LAA-Closure
Questionnaire to patient with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAC between 2009 and 2014 at the University hospitals Bern or Zurich
Questionnaire
A clinical sweep follow up will be performed in all patients of both groups and results will be analyzed. It will be in form of a standardized questionnaire and if necessary telephone interviews asking about thrombo-embolic events, stroke, death, any bleeding but also on their current medication, comorbidities (i.e. arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal impairment and liver disease), any hospitalizations and their quality of life. For all events, the source documents will be gathered from general physicians, cardiologists, hospitals or registry offices.
The questionnaire will be sent by mail to the patients. If information is missing or unclear, patients and if necessary their treating physician will be contacted by phone.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaire
A clinical sweep follow up will be performed in all patients of both groups and results will be analyzed. It will be in form of a standardized questionnaire and if necessary telephone interviews asking about thrombo-embolic events, stroke, death, any bleeding but also on their current medication, comorbidities (i.e. arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal impairment and liver disease), any hospitalizations and their quality of life. For all events, the source documents will be gathered from general physicians, cardiologists, hospitals or registry offices.
The questionnaire will be sent by mail to the patients. If information is missing or unclear, patients and if necessary their treating physician will be contacted by phone.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent to participate in the study
* Paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
* Group A ("OAC"): Having been hospitalized between 2009 and 2014 in the Bern university hospital and discharged with either OAC or NOAC.
* Group B (LAA-closure): Underwent LAAC between 2009 and 2014 at the University hospitals Bern or Zurich
Exclusion Criteria
* Only for group A: Not matched patients having been dropped out after the propensity score matching
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Steffen Gloeckler, PD Dr. med
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University hospital Berne
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Reddy VY, Sievert H, Halperin J, Doshi SK, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Whisenant B, Kar S, Swarup V, Gordon N, Holmes D; PROTECT AF Steering Committee and Investigators. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure vs warfarin for atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):1988-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15192.
Reddy VY, Mobius-Winkler S, Miller MA, Neuzil P, Schuler G, Wiebe J, Sick P, Sievert H. Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 25;61(25):2551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.035. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
Tzikas A, Shakir S, Gafoor S, Omran H, Berti S, Santoro G, Kefer J, Landmesser U, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Sievert H, Tichelbacker T, Kanagaratnam P, Nietlispach F, Aminian A, Kasch F, Freixa X, Danna P, Rezzaghi M, Vermeersch P, Stock F, Stolcova M, Costa M, Ibrahim R, Schillinger W, Meier B, Park JW. Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: multicentre experience with the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug. EuroIntervention. 2016 Feb;11(10):1170-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M01_06.
Nietlispach F, Gloekler S, Krause R, Shakir S, Schmid M, Khattab AA, Wenaweser P, Windecker S, Meier B. Amplatzer left atrial appendage occlusion: single center 10-year experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug 1;82(2):283-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24872. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-00630
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.