Laparoscopic Surgery VS RFA for Recurrent HCC

NCT ID: NCT02785380

Last Updated: 2016-06-02

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: PHASE4
• Total Enrollment: 340 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2016-12-31
• Study Completion Date: 2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Management of recurrent HCC is urgent and several treatments have been developed .Repeat hepatectomy is considered to be the first choice for recurrent HCC.

Unfortunately, repeated open hepatectomy can be performed only in a small proportion of patients due to inadequate liver function reserve, widespread recurrence or high invasiveness. Given that recurrent tumors are usually detected at small size during follow-up after initial surgery, radiofreqency ablation (RFA), which is less invasive, may be locally curative and causes minimal damage to liver function reserve,has been widely used. However, the re-recurrence rate after RFA is more than 50%,and the recurrence-free survival is less than 20%. Recently, satisfactory short- and long-term oncological outcomes have been reported for laparoscopic surgery (LS) for the treatment for primary HCC with cirrhosis. Some single center pilot studies reported that LS may, compared with open surgery, improve the prognosis of HCC with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. LS was initially considered not suitable for recurrent HCC due to postoperative adhesions that might make laparoscopic surgical procedure more difficult and less safe. With improvement in technique and experience, recent studies showed that LS for recurrent HCC in cirrhotic patients is a safe and feasible procedure with good short-term outcomes. However, thus far, no study has been performed to evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes of LS for recurrent HCC, and compare those results to that for RFA. To clarify these issues, a multicenter retrospective comparative study by using propensity score matching method that included a large consecutive series of patients with recurrent HCC within Milan criteria, who underwent LS or RFA, was performed.

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

laparoscopic surgery(LS)

For LS,the patient was usually placed in the lithotomy position. Pneumoperitoneum was maintained at a pressure between 12 and 14 mmHg.Intra-operative ultrasonography was performed routinely. Large bile duct branches or vessels were clipped before division and minor hemostasis was carried out using bipolar diathermy. Large hepatic vein branches were divided by endovascular staplers. The Pringle maneuver was not used. Wedge resection, segmentectomy or subsegmentectomy was performed. The surgeon aimed to achieve a 1.0-cm safety margin during the liver resection.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

laparoscopic surgery(LS)

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

For LS, the patient was usually placed in the lithotomy position. Pneumoperitoneum was maintained at a pressure between 12 and 14 mmHg. Three to 4 working ports sized between 5 mm and 12 mm were used . Intra-operative ultrasonography was performed routinely. Parenchymal transection was performed using a Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA, Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA). Large bile duct branches or vessels were clipped before division and minor hemostasis was carried out using bipolar diathermy. Large hepatic vein branches were divided by endovascular staplers. A 1.0-cm safety margin was planed to get during the liver resection.

Radiofrequency ablation(RFA)

RFA was performed according to the Guidelines of Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Liver Cancer: Chinese Expert Consensus Statement issued by the Chinese Society of Liver Cancer and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. RFA was performed by using a commercially available Cool-tipTM RFA system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA), or a RF 2000 system (Radio-Therapeutics Mountain View, CA).

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RFA

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

RFA was performed according to the Guidelines of Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Liver Cancer: Chinese Expert Consensus Statement issued by the Chinese Society of Liver Cancer and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology RFA was performed under real-time ultrasound guidance. RFA was performed by using a commercially available Cool-tipTM RFA system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA), or a RF 2000 system (Radio-Therapeutics Mountain View, CA). Grounding was achieved by attaching 2 pads to the patient's back or legs.

Interventions

laparoscopic surgery(LS)

For LS, the patient was usually placed in the lithotomy position. Pneumoperitoneum was maintained at a pressure between 12 and 14 mmHg. Three to 4 working ports sized between 5 mm and 12 mm were used . Intra-operative ultrasonography was performed routinely. Parenchymal transection was performed using a Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA, Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA). Large bile duct branches or vessels were clipped before division and minor hemostasis was carried out using bipolar diathermy. Large hepatic vein branches were divided by endovascular staplers. A 1.0-cm safety margin was planed to get during the liver resection.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

RFA

RFA was performed according to the Guidelines of Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Liver Cancer: Chinese Expert Consensus Statement issued by the Chinese Society of Liver Cancer and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology RFA was performed under real-time ultrasound guidance. RFA was performed by using a commercially available Cool-tipTM RFA system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA), or a RF 2000 system (Radio-Therapeutics Mountain View, CA). Grounding was achieved by attaching 2 pads to the patient's back or legs.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18-75 years;

2. First recurrent HCC after curative hepatectomy;

3. A solitary recurrent HCC ≤ 3.0 cm in diameter, or multiple recurrent HCC ≤ 3 lesions, each ≤ 3.0 cm in diameter;

4. Tumor located in left lateral lobe (segment II or III) or subcapsule of liver(subcapsular nodule was defined as a lesion located less than 1 cm from the liver edge and could be treated by either LS or RFA.

5. No radiologic evidence of invasion into major portal/ hepatic vein branches;

6. No extrahepatic metastases;

7. Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A or B;

Exclusion Criteria

1. Coagulation disorders (prothrombin activity <40% or a platelet count of <80,000/mm3);

2. History of hepatic encephalopathy, ascites refractory to diuretics or esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding;

3. History of a secondary malignancy;

4. Severe dysfunction of the heart, kidney, or other organs

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 75 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Second Military Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Sun Yat-sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Ming Kuang

Ph.D.,M.D.

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Ming Kuang, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Central Contacts

Zhen-Wei Peng, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

pengzhenwei2005@163.com

862087755766 ext. 8576

Ming Kuang, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

pengzhenwei2005@163.com

862087755766 ext. 8576

References

Camma C, Di Marco V, Orlando A, Sandonato L, Casaril A, Parisi P, Alizzi S, Sciarrino E, Virdone R, Pardo S, Di Bona D, Licata A, Latteri F, Cabibbo G, Montalto G, Latteri MA, Nicoli N, Craxi A; Unita Interdipartimentale Neoplasie Epatiche (U.I.N.E) Group. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in compensated cirrhosis with radio-frequency thermal ablation (RFTA): a prospective study. J Hepatol. 2005 Apr;42(4):535-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.11.042.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15868653 (View on PubMed)

Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results of treatment and prognostic factors. Ann Surg. 1999 Feb;229(2):216-22. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199902000-00009.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10024103 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

HCC007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id