Initiating ACP in General Practice. A Phase II Study

NCT ID: NCT02775032

Last Updated: 2016-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

End-of-life care often fails in providing optimal patient-centred care and quality of life. Patients frequently suffer from inadequate control of pain, from a lack of communication about their illness and options for treatment, and from poor psychosocial and spiritual support. Advance care planning (ACP) can tackle these problems by providing patients with an opportunity to formulate their wishes and plan their future care, should they become incapable of participating in medical treatment decisions. Previous studies show that ACP improves concordance between patient's preferences and end-of-life care received and quality of care at the end-of-life. However, ACP is yet to be embedded in routine clinical practice and public consciousness. General practitioners (GPs) are in an ideal position to discuss ACP with their patients. By introducing ACP during a routine office visit, GPs can facilitate a structured discussion of the patient's wishes for end-of-life care. However, no ACP models have been systematically developed and tested in general practice. We developed a complex intervention to improve the initiation of ACP in general practice following the steps of an international guidance for development and evaluation of complex interventions. Before performing a full-scale intervention trial to study the effectiveness of this intervention on quality of care and quality of life, this model needs to be validated and tested in a pilot trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim

1\) to conduct the Phase II trial with GPs who will facilitate a structured ACP session with patients with a serious or life-threatening illness versus usual care and 2) to evaluate and validate the ACP intervention in terms of feasibility, acceptance to GPs and patients with a serious or life-threatening illness, and preliminary proof of effectiveness

Method

The implementation and preliminary evaluation of this intervention will be done by following the steps of the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework on complex intervention designs. This framework proposes a stepwise approach going from phase 0 to phase IV.

Phase 0-I were previously conducted by the research team and comprised the development of the intervention. This project proposal comprises phase II (exploratory trial) in which the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention will be evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Life-threatening Illness Palliative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Advance care planning conversations between patients and their GP

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with a serious or life-threatening illness
* older than 18 years
* Dutch speaking
* eligible according to the Surprise question
* able to give informed consent
* able to complete questionnaires and participate in qualitative interview

Exclusion Criteria

* younger than 18 years
* incompetent to participate due to mental incapacity
* unable to give informed consent
* unable to complete questionnaires or participate in qualitative interviews
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aline De Vleminck

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dierickx S, Pardon K, Pype P, Stevens J, Vander Stichele R, Deliens L, De Vleminck A. 'Advance care planning, general practitioners and patients: a phase II cluster-randomised controlled trial in chronic life-limiting illness'. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Dec 2:bmjspcare-2020-002712. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002712. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33268475 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VZP_HA_2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.