Promoting Self-determination for Institutionalized Older People Without Decision-making Capacity: Advance Care Planning by Proxy
NCT ID: NCT04779684
Last Updated: 2023-12-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-01
2023-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participation in ACP requires decision-making capacity. Yet, many people lose this capacity before having formally expressed their care preferences. In these cases, their health care proxies, families and health professionals are called upon to make decisions on their behalf, based on what they believe the person would have wanted (presumed will). This is problematic and distressing for both family members and health professionals. The fact that many people do not participate in ACP or complete advanced directives, along with an increasing prevalence of neuro-degenerative diseases entailing a loss of decision-making capacity, means that growing numbers of people are likely to require others to make medical decisions on their behalf.
The investigator's exploratory research, confirmed by the literature, highlights an urgent unmet need for comprehensive and systematic interventions to assist in promoting self-determination of older people who lack decision making capacity. ACP by proxy (ACP-bp) has been suggested as a model to help proxies of incapacitated patients plan ahead and prepare for future care decisions. However, this model has never been specifically developed nor tested. This is why the investigators have developed a specific model of ACP-bp and aim to test it in a pilot study among proxies of residential aged care facility (RACF) residents who lack decision making capacity, primarily due to advanced dementia.
The investigators aim to test the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention and the appropriateness of outcome measures through a pilot study in two RACFs in the Swiss canton of Vaud over a period of one year. A process evaluation will be conducted through the triangulation of mixed-method data: self-report scales, semi-structured interviews, document analyses, resident health care records and an economic cost analysis. This will form the basis for a subsequent cluster-randomized control trial to test the intervention's effectiveness. This novel approach of ACP-bp has potential to promote self-determination and patient-centered care that improves both the ethical appropriateness and economic sustainability of care. It may lead to patients being treated in accordance with their wishes, reduce unnecessary overtreatment and avoid distress for family members and health care professionals. This approach also responds to calls for models of ACP which can be used in people with dementia and people living in RACFs, vulnerable populations that have generally remained invisible in ACP research so far.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ACP by proxy pilot intervention group
All participants are included in the intervention group
Advance care planning by proxy for health care proxies of people without medical decision making capacity
Two discussions between a trained health professional and a health care proxy of an RACF resident who no longer has decision making capacity. First discussion focuses on life story, values, previous experiences with medical treatments, illness and death. Second discussion also includes treating physician and focuses on establishing general goals of care and medical orders in case of emergency.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Advance care planning by proxy for health care proxies of people without medical decision making capacity
Two discussions between a trained health professional and a health care proxy of an RACF resident who no longer has decision making capacity. First discussion focuses on life story, values, previous experiences with medical treatments, illness and death. Second discussion also includes treating physician and focuses on establishing general goals of care and medical orders in case of emergency.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Has sufficient language proficiency to complete a written questionnaire and participate in discussions.
Exclusion Criteria
* Lacks decision making capacity
70 Years
110 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ralf J. Jox
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ralf J. Jox
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ralf J Jox, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Lausanne Hospitals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lausanne University Hospital
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ACPbp
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id