Structural and Functional Correlates of Clinical Response to rTMS Treatment in Schizophrenia Patients With Resistant Auditory Hallucinations

NCT ID: NCT02755623

Last Updated: 2024-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-14

Study Completion Date

2025-10-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The potential of non-invasive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as a therapeutic tool for improving schizophrenic symptoms, in particular resistant hallucinations, has been increasingly studied over the past decades. Several studies have demonstrated that low-frequency patterns of repetitive TMS (rTMS) applied over the left Temporoparietal Junction (TPJ), which are known to decrease local activity, significantly reduced auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenic patients. In spite of highly promising results, a high level of inter-individual variability in the responses to non-invasive brain stimulation treatments, and the fact that rTMS may prove ineffective in some patients, keep spurring controversy about the efficacy of these approaches (as currently performed), as well as about how to increase its efficacy and consistency. Accordingly, the objectives of this project are to better understand the impact of rTMS on the brains of patients with resistant auditory hallucinations, and to use this information not only to better understand this condition but to develop more efficient and consistent therapies. Thus, in this study, the investigators focus more specifically on resistant auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia, which is a common symptom in schizophrenic patients, and can be treated by rTMS. The investigators hypothesize that there is a baseline difference in anatomical and/or functional connectivity between responder and non-responder patients who are treated with rTMS. Therefore, our project will aim to determine some anatomical and functional connectivity markers of response to rTMS treatment in patients with schizophrenia

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The potential of non-invasive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as a therapeutic tool for improving schizophrenic symptoms, in particular resistant hallucinations, has been increasingly studied over the past decades. Several studies have demonstrated that low-frequency patterns of repetitive TMS (rTMS) on the left temporoparietal junction (TPJ), which are known to decrease local activity, significantly reduce auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenic patients. In spite of highly promising results, a high level of inter-individual variability in the response to non-invasive brain stimulation treatments, and the fact that rTMS may prove ineffective in some patients, keep spurring controversy on the efficacy of these approaches as currently performed, and on how to increase its efficacy and consistency. To date, few studies have aimed to explain this variability when, in fact, a better understanding of this common phenomena in the neurostimulation domain would clearly increase the effectiveness of this treatment, and lead to individualized therapeutic approaches specifically tailored to the conditions of each patient. Moreover, many questions stand, particularly regarding the influence of rTMS treatment on the anatomical and functional connectivity in schizophrenic patients.

Accordingly, the objectives of this project are to better understand the impact of rTMS on the brains of patients with resistant auditory hallucinations, and to use this information not only to better understand this condition but to develop more efficient and consistent therapies. The investigators hypothesize that there is a baseline difference in anatomical and/or functional connectivity between responder and non-responder patients who are treated with rTMS. Therefore, this project aims to determine some anatomical and functional connectivity markers of response to rTMS treatment in patients with schizophrenia. For this, the investigators compare the patterns of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) white matter tractography and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data between responder and non-responder patients to rTMS treatment. Moreover, the investigators believe that rTMS can increase the functional connectivity between frontal and temporo-parietal cortices in schizophrenic patients associated with improvements in auditory hallucinations. Therefore, the second objectives of this work are to evaluate the impact of rTMS in functional connectivity in patients with schizophrenia by comparing the DTI and resting-state fMRI data before and after rTMS treatment in both responder and non-responder patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Schizophrenia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

low-frequency (1 Hertz) rTMS

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants are sequentially randomly assigned to either 20 active rTMS sessions or 20 sham rTMS sessions that were applied over the left temporoparietal junction. Treatments are administered daily, over a period of two weeks.

Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

sham TMS

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

Participants are sequentially randomly assigned to either 20 active rTMS sessions or 20 sham rTMS sessions that were applied over the left temporoparietal junction. Treatments are administered daily, over a period of two weeks.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with a diagnosis of schizophrenia according to DSM-V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder V, 2013) criteria
* Clinically stabilized for at least 3 months
* Patient with resistant auditory hallucinations
* Male or female, 18 to 65 years old
* A written agreement from the patient's legal guardian/s, if applicable
* Right-handed
* A good knowledge of the French language
* Signed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Other diseases than schizophrenia
* Indulging in an addiction (alcohol, psychoactive substances) over the last 12 months
* Patient who has received rTMS treatment in the last 12 months
* Patient who is participating in a concurrent research protocol
* Patient with a history of seizures
* rTMS contraindications: patient with epilepsy, brain surgery and/or head trauma in the past, use of cardiac pacemaker, or surgical staples on the scalp
* MRI contraindications: pregnancy or lactating (n.b. a negative pregnancy test will be required if the patient is a female in reproductive years who does not use contraception); use of cardiac pace maker or surgical staples; patient with a neurological disorder, head trauma or claustrophobia
* Patient with severe cardiovascular disease
* Patient with medication which reduces the epileptic threshold (bupropion, methadone and theophylline)
* Patients placed in psychiatric care either by the state or a third party
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dominique JANUEL

head of research center and clinical professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fanny Thomas, BIOLOGISTE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Unité de Recherche Clinique, EPS Ville Evrard, Neuilly-sur-Marne,, France, 93330

Dominique Januel, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Unité de Recherche Clinique, EPS Ville Evrard, Neuilly-sur-Marne,, France, 93330

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Unité de Recherche Clinique, EPS Ville Evrard

Neuilly-sur-Marne, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Arezki Ourrad

Role: CONTACT

+33143093232

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

OURRAD AREZKI, CRA

Role: primary

0143093030

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Thomas F, Bouaziz N, Gallea C, Schenin-King Andrianisaina P, Durand F, Bollore O, Benadhira R, Isaac C, Braha-Zeitoun S, Moulier V, Valero-Cabre A, Januel D. Structural and functional brain biomarkers of clinical response to rTMS of medication-resistant auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia patients: study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled double-blind clinical trial. Trials. 2019 Apr 23;20(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3311-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31014369 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

dmdpt6tech/mm/2014-A01595-42

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Navigated αTMS in Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia
NCT01941251 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
TMS for Inhibition Enhancement in Schizophrenia
NCT06155682 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA