The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Working Memory
NCT ID: NCT01494623
Last Updated: 2013-06-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
122 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-05-31
2012-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* evaluate rTMS as a treatment for WM deficits in SCZ
* evaluate rTMS as a method to increase WM performance in healthy individuals
* determine if improvements in WM performance are related to enhanced synchronization of brain networks
* determine whether genetic polymorphisms predict cortical function and treatment response
* evaluate the influence of rTMS treatment on brain structure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
rTMS for Working Memory Deficits in Schizophrenia
NCT01880255
Effects of rTMS on Cigarette Smoking and Cognition in Schizophrenia
NCT01523730
Improving Neurocognitive Deficits and Function in Schizophrenia With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
NCT03037983
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as an add-on Treatment for Resistant Obsessive-compulsive Symptoms in Patients With Schizophrenia
NCT02105064
Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Memory
NCT00105118
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is considerable evidence to support the fact that WM deficits in schizophrenia are heritable and have a strong genetic component. This evidence emerges from genetic association studies, and studies demonstrating that unaffected relatives of schizophrenia patients also suffer WM deficits. Therefore, treatment response to rTMS may be at least partly contingent on genetic variation within each individual. In particular, GABAergic genes that code for GABAergic proteins which largely determine cortical inhibition may play a key role in treatment response to rTMS over the DLPFC. However, several other gene systems that interact with the GABAergic system may also play a role, and would also merit investigation. Similarly brain structure may also determine treatment response. For instance, volume or thickness of the DLPFC and DLPFC related circuitry has been shown to play a role in WM performance, and therefore, may be a biomarker of treatment response.
Objective 1: To improve WM in patients with SCZ, and in healthy individuals using rTMS.
Hypothesis 1:20 Hz rTMS over the DLPFC will be superior to sham stimulation in improving WM performance in patients with SCZ, and healthy individuals.
Objective 2: To evaluate if high frequency rTMS results in enhanced gamma synchrony SCZ and healthy individuals.
Hypothesis 2: 20 Hz rTMS over the DLPRC will be superior to sham stimulation at increasing gamma synchrony in patients with SCZ, and healthy individuals.
Objective 3: To determine if the rTMS induced increase in gamma band synchrony mediates the therapeutic effects of rTMS on WM performance in patients with SCZ and healthy individuals.
Hypothesis 3: Increased gamma band synchrony will be shown to mediate the therapeutic effects of rTMS on WM performance in SCZ and healthy individuals.
Objective 4: To test whether key polymorphisms in the GABAergic system, and related gene systems determine γ oscillatory activity and WM improvement following rTMS.
Hypothesis 4: GABAergic gene and related gene polymorphisms will determine variation in γ oscillatory activity and WM performance following rTMS treatment.
Objective 5: To examine whether brain structure is a biomarker of treatment response to rTMS Hypothesis 5: Increase in cortical thickness at DLPFC and in microstructural integrity in cortico-cortical white matter tracts connecting to DLPFC will correlate with n-back task performance after rTMS treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active rTMS
Active treatment will be delivered at an intensity that is 90% of the RMT. Stimulation will be delivered at either 20 Hz or 10 Hz, depending on the patients' tolerance to the stimulation, with 50 stimulation trains of 30 stimuli each (i.e., 1500 stimuli) and an intertrain interval of 30 sec. 25 trains will be applied to to the left or right hemisphere followed by the other hemisphere.
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Magnetic pulses to specified brain regions.
Sham rTMS
Sham stimulation will be delivered using the same stimulation parameters and at the site of active treatment, but with only the side-edge resting on the scalp. The coil will be angled 45 degrees away from the skull in a single-wing tilt position. This method produces sound and some somatic sensation (e.g., contraction of scalp muscles) similar to those of active stimulation, but with minimal direct brain effects.
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Magnetic pulses to specified brain regions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Magnetic pulses to specified brain regions.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* SCID-IV Diagnosis of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder
* Between the ages of 18 and 85
* voluntary and competent to consent
* between the ages of 18-85
* considered a healthy individual free of psychopathology based on the Personality Assessment Inventory
* right-handed determined by the TMS screening and demographic form
* self-reported non-smoker
* do not have a self-reported concomitant major medical or neurologic illness
* if a woman of childbearing potential, must be on an effective means of birth control determined through completion of the TMS screening and demographic form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Have a concomitant major and unstable medical or neurologic illness
* Have a history of seizures
* Have a first degree relative with a history of a seizure disorder
* Are pregnant
* Have any clinically significant EEG activity indicating an increased risk of seizure, as confirmed by a neurologist.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Z. J. Daskalakis
Chair, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Z. Jeff Daskalakis, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CAMH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barr MS, Farzan F, Rajji TK, Voineskos AN, Blumberger DM, Arenovich T, Fitzgerald PB, Daskalakis ZJ. Can repetitive magnetic stimulation improve cognition in schizophrenia? Pilot data from a randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Mar 15;73(6):510-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Information about research at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Canada's largest mental health and addiction teaching hospital, fully affiliated with the University of Toronto, and a PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
098 / 2006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.