Closed-Loop Control in Young Children 5-8 Years Old Using DiAs Platform

NCT ID: NCT02750267

Last Updated: 2017-07-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall aim of this proposed research is to determine the safety, feasibility and efficacy (AP vs at home use of SAP) of the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) controller in day and night closed-loop control in young children 5-8 years old with type 1 diabetes over multiple 48 hours in an out-patient setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Young children with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) in the age range of 5-8 years old are a population with clear needs but unique challenges regarding the application of artificial pancreas (AP) technologies. Young children are likely to benefit from an AP system, with current deficits in glycemic control that include both significant hypoglycemia and sub-optimal HbA1c levels; however, they have undeveloped abilities to control and interact with the AP system, posing potential safety issues. During the hours that these children are away from their parents at school and elsewhere, they lack the sophistication to operate the currently-available tools in an AP system--and may induce harm if they are allowed to do so, causing parental resistance to AP use. Commercially-available insulin pumps have mechanisms to lock access to children to prevent inappropriate insulin-delivery. However, the AP is more complex than an insulin pump, both in requiring more detailed setting information (that a child could adversely alter) and in providing alerts for impending low- and high-blood glucose (BG) levels (that one wouldn't want to lock out to child use). These functions are all run via a platform on a smart phone-a device with which young children may already feel a high degree of familiarity and thus be more likely to attempt to explore and potentially change settings. It is likely that young children will benefit the most from a system that gives them access to some AP features but provides access to other features only for their parents. In this sense, young children require a device that is not user-centered as much as family-centered. A redesign of the system to provide appropriate access to AP tools-in which certain users can obtain access to certain functionalities-is direly needed before children in this age range can benefit from the improvements in blood glucose (BG) control that the AP has to offer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

In this randomized, cross-over study, the intervention involves blood glucose control using a Closed Loop system run by the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) during a stay at a Research House/Hotel. All subjects will have blood glucose data compared between their usual diabetes care (at home, using home insulin pump) and this Closed-Loop care (at Research House/Hotel using the DiAs system). Subjects who are randomized to Group A will have home care evaluated before the Research House/Hotel admission. Subjects in this arm will participate in CGM training and data collection prior to the Research House/Hotel admission.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) with Closed-Loop

Intervention Type DEVICE

All subjects will use DiAs Medical Platform, a study insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in closed-loop mode during a Research House/Hotel admission that will last up to 72 hours.

Group B

Group B is identical to Group A with the exception that usual diabetes care (at home, using home insulin pump) will be evaluated after the Research House/Hotel admission. Subjects who are randomized to Group B will participate in CGM training and data collection after the Research House/Hotel admission. As with Group A, all subjects will use Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) with Closed-Loop during the admission.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) with Closed-Loop

Intervention Type DEVICE

All subjects will use DiAs Medical Platform, a study insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in closed-loop mode during a Research House/Hotel admission that will last up to 72 hours.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) with Closed-Loop

All subjects will use DiAs Medical Platform, a study insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in closed-loop mode during a Research House/Hotel admission that will last up to 72 hours.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes,

* The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is based on the investigator's judgment
* C peptide levels and antibody determinations are not required
* Daily insulin therapy for ≥ 12 months
* Insulin pump therapy for ≥ 3 months
* Age ≥5 - ≤8 years old
* Avoidance of acetaminophen-containing medications (i.e. Tylenol) while wearing the continuous glucose monitor.
* Willingness to wear a continuous glucose sensor and physiological monitor for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria

The presence of any of the following is an exclusion for the study:

* Diabetic ketoacidosis in the past month
* Hypoglycemic seizure or loss of consciousness in the past 3 months
* History of seizure disorder (except for hypoglycemic seizure)
* History of any heart disease including coronary artery disease, heart failure, or arrhythmias
* Cystic fibrosis
* Current use of oral glucocorticoids, beta-blockers or other medications, which in the judgment of the investigator would be a contraindication to participation in the study.
* History of ongoing renal disease (other than microalbuminuria).
* Subjects requiring intermediate or long-acting insulin (such as NPH, Detemir or Glargine).
* Subjects requiring other anti-diabetic medications other than insulin (oral or injectable).
* Presence of a febrile illness within 24 hours of admission or acetaminophen use while wearing the CGM. The subject may be rescheduled for Research House/Hotel Admission if these criteria are not met. The study subject will not participate in the trial if these conditions are met.
* Medical or psychiatric condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as:

* Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months
* Uncontrolled adrenal insufficiency
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

DexCom, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Virginia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mark DeBoer, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark D. DeBoer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Virginia, Pediatrics, Endocrinology/Diabetes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

DeBoer MD, Breton MD, Wakeman C, Schertz EM, Emory EG, Robic JL, Kollar LL, Kovatchev BP, Chernavvsky DR. Performance of an Artificial Pancreas System for Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 May;19(5):293-298. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0424. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28426239 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28426239

Use of an AP in young children was safe and resulted in improved mean BG without increased hypoglycemia. This suggests that AP use in young children is safe and improves overall diabetes control.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18888

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.