Study to Assess if ABP798 is Safe & Effective in Treating Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Compared to Rituximab

NCT ID: NCT02747043

Last Updated: 2022-09-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

256 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-25

Study Completion Date

2019-06-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multiple-dose, clinical similarity study to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of ABP 798 compared with rituximab in subjects with grade 1, 2, or 3a follicular B-cell NHL and low tumor burden.

Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 375 mg/m\^2 intravenous infusion of either ABP 798 or rituximab once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ABP 798

ABP 798 was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m\^2 as an intravenous (IV) infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ABP 798

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

ABP 798 was supplied as a sterile, preservative-free liquid concentrate for IV infusion at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in either 100 mg/10 mL or 500 mg/50 mL single-dose vials. Subjects were to receive premedications before each infusion. Premedications were to be given according to local practice for administration of rituximab therapy.

Rituximab

Rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m\^2 as an IV infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rituximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Rituximab was procured from commercial supplies in the US and was supplied as a sterile, clear, colorless, preservative-free liquid concentrate for IV infusion at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in either 100-mg/10 mL or 500-mg/50 mL single-dose vials. Subjects were to receive premedications before each infusion. Premedications were to be given according to local practice for administration of rituximab therapy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ABP 798

ABP 798 was supplied as a sterile, preservative-free liquid concentrate for IV infusion at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in either 100 mg/10 mL or 500 mg/50 mL single-dose vials. Subjects were to receive premedications before each infusion. Premedications were to be given according to local practice for administration of rituximab therapy.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Rituximab

Rituximab was procured from commercial supplies in the US and was supplied as a sterile, clear, colorless, preservative-free liquid concentrate for IV infusion at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in either 100-mg/10 mL or 500-mg/50 mL single-dose vials. Subjects were to receive premedications before each infusion. Premedications were to be given according to local practice for administration of rituximab therapy.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

biosimilar to rituximab Rituxan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males and females 18 years of age and older
* Histological confirmed (by lymph node or extranodal region biopsy), Grade 1, 2, or 3a follicular B-cell NHL expressing CD20 within 12 months before randomization
* Stage 2, 3, or 4 (per Cotswold's Modification of Ann Arbor Staging System) with measurable disease (per International Working Group)

* subjects must have a baseline scan (computed tomography \[CT\]) of the neck (if palpable lymph node \> 1.0 cm), chest, abdomen, and pelvis to assess disease burden within 6 weeks before randomization
* subjects must have had a baseline bone marrow biopsy within 12 months before randomization. Previously confirmed positive bone marrow involvement does not need to be repeated for purposes of screening.
* Low tumor burden based on the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criteria

* largest nodal or extranodal mass ≤ 7 cm
* no more than 3 nodal sites with diameter \> 3 cm
* no splenomegaly \> 16cm by CT scan and no symptomatic splenomegaly
* no significant pleural or peritoneal serous effusions by CT
* lactate dehydrogenase ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN)
* no B symptoms (night sweats, fever \[temperature \> 38°C\], weight loss \> 10% in the previous 6 months)

Exclusion Criteria

* Diffuse large cell component and/or Grade 3b follicular NHL
* History or known presence of central nervous system metastases
* Malignancy other than NHL within 5 years (except treated in-situ cervical cancer, or squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin)
* Recent infection requiring a course of systemic anti-infective agents that was completed ≤ 7 days before randomization (with the exception of uncomplicated urinary tract infection)
* Other investigational procedures that can impact the study data, results, or patient safety while participating in this study are excluded; participation in observational studies is allowed.
* Subject is currently enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) since ending other investigational device or drug study(s), including vaccines, or subject is receiving other investigational agent(s)
* Previous use of either commercially available or investigational chemotherapy, biological, or immunological therapy for NHL (including rituximab or biosimilar rituximab, or other anti-CD20 treatments)
* Systemic corticosteroid use within 3 months before randomization (inhaled are allowable)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mount Sterling, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Zanesville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gosford, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Frankston, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

Site Status

Research Site

Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, Prague, Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrava - Poruba, Severomoravsky KRAJ, Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France

Site Status

Research Site

Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France

Site Status

Research Site

Cesson-Sévigné, Brittany Region, France

Site Status

Research Site

Boulogne-sur-Mer, Hauts-de-France, France

Site Status

Research Site

La Rochelle, Poitou-charentes, France

Site Status

Research Site

Poitiers, Poitou-charentes, France

Site Status

Research Site

Batumi, , Georgia

Site Status

Research Site

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Research Site

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Research Site

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Research Site

Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Kassel, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Flensburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, Attica, Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, Attica, Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Patra, Peloponnese, Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Surat, Gujarat, India

Site Status

Research Site

Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Site Status

Research Site

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Research Site

Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Research Site

Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Pune, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Bikaner, Rajasthan, India

Site Status

Research Site

Be’er Ya‘aqov, Rehoboth, Israel

Site Status

Research Site

San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Pesaro, Pesaro E Urbino, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Aviano, Pordenone, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Candiolo, Torino, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Ravenna, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Rimini, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Terni, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Chiba, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Maebashi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Tsu, Mie-ken, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Tachikawa, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Torun, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Legnica, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Târgu Mureş, Mureș County, Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Târgu Mureş, Mureș County, Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Timișoara, Timiș County, Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Pusan, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Ulsan, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

La Laguna Tenerife, Santa CRUZ DE Tenerife, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Cadiz, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Cáceres, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Kyiv, Kyiv City, Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kyiv, Kyiv City, Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Uzhhorod, Zakarpattia Oblast, Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Chernivtsi, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Bulgaria Canada Colombia Czechia France Georgia Germany Greece India Israel Italy Japan Mexico Poland Romania South Korea Spain Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Niederwieser D, Hamm C, Cobb P, Mo M, Forsyth C, Tucci A, Hanes V, Delwail V, Hajek R, Chien D. Efficacy and Safety of ABP 798: Results from the JASMINE Trial in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Comparison with Rituximab Reference Product. Target Oncol. 2020 Oct;15(5):599-611. doi: 10.1007/s11523-020-00748-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33044684 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-005542-11

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

20130109

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.