Reassure Spot Respiration Rate Accuracy Compared to SOMNOScreen
NCT ID: NCT02740504
Last Updated: 2021-04-02
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-01-31
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The RR was measured over a short duration on subjects sitting upright in a chair, with the non-contact sensor at various distances from the subject. A total of 20 subjects were tested, from both genders, selected to represent a wide range of age and body mass index
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Respiration Rate V2.0 in Healthy Volunteers
NCT01804062
Respiration Rate V2.0 in a Hospital Setting
NCT01837537
Accuracy of SpO2 for Noninvasive Pulse Oximeter Sensor (LNCS ADTX)
NCT03125018
Respiratory Rate Validation Study - RS001.2 Respiree Cardio-Respiratory Monitor
NCT05210712
Accuracy of Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Noninvasive Pulse Oximeter Sensor (RD Disposable) Under Motion Conditions
NCT03124784
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim is to explore the variations in the human body that could have an effect on the radio reflection from the human torso, and thus affect the potential detection and accuracy of breathing rate. Factors that could affect non-contact RF performance are:
* High Body Mass Index (BMI) could potentially reduce the chest wall movement during breathing, or alter the nature of the breathing.
* Elderly, thin skin (ie pensioner with low BMI) may have less RF reflection.
* Female breast tissue may have an effect on detection or accuracy.
This was tested at a number of distances from the non-contact sensor and also with the subject having a thick comforter (duvet) laid across them.
The test conditions were
* Distances of 0.5 m, 1.0m and 1.5m between the subject and the RF sensor.
* Additional test condition of comforter (duvet) on the subject when the distance from subject to sensor is 1.0 m.
* Each test condition carried out twice.
The use of the comforter in one test condition is to confirm that the RR measurement by the Reassure is unaffected by the thickness of clothing or blankets being worn.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Subjects
All 20 subjects. Selected to have a range of ages (18 to less than 75) and BMI from 18.5 to 45
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI within the range of greater or equal to 18 and less than or equal to 45
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ResMed
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul Phillips, MA, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ResMed Sensor Technologies
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lim WS, Carty SM, Macfarlane JT, Anthony RE, Christian J, Dakin KS, Dennis PM. Respiratory rate measurement in adults--how reliable is it? Respir Med. 2002 Jan;96(1):31-3. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1203.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
D22105-106
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.