Effect of EPD on the Lumbar Acoustic Window at Term Pregnancy

NCT ID: NCT02711150

Last Updated: 2018-03-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-03

Study Completion Date

2016-10-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess whether application of an epidural positioning device to a parturient seated for neuraxial anaesthesia increase the size of the paramedian target area for neuraxial needle insertion. Lumbar ultrasonography will be performed in 30 pregnant women in two seated positions: (P1), lumbar flexion; and (P2), as in P1 with the epidural positioning device applied. For each position, the size of the 'target area', defined as the visible length of the posterior longitudinal ligament will be measured at the L3-L4 interspace.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Thirty term pregnant women will be recruited. Signed informed consent will be obtained from all subjects and demographic details, including age, weight, height and body mass index (BMI) will be documented. Randomization and blinding: Randomization will not be performed in this study, because each patient is their own control Interventions: Two experienced operators who have previously performed several hundred landmark-guided and ultrasound-assisted neuraxial blocks will perform the clinical and ultrasound examination.. The patient will then be placed in each of the positions described below. While in each of the positions an ultrasound (US) probe will be placed at level L3- L4 at the paramedian position to visualize the paravertebral longitudinal ligament (PLL) . These measurements will be recorded by an observer. In both phases (first US operator and second US operator ), 2 ultrasound measurements will be made for each of the following positions at 1 lumbar level in the paramedian view. These measurements will be made with the patient in the following positions: • Sitting position, feet supported with back flexed. • Sitting position, feet supported and arms supported through the application of an epidural positioning device. All images will be assigned a number based on a random number generator to remove any identifying data, including volunteer number, date, time, and position. The PLL will be remeasured on every saved image by two separate anesthesiologists ('readers') who are not involved with any previous data collection but are members of the study team. Both will be blinded to the number allocation and each other's measured values. This aim to remove any bias by the 'scanning' anesthesiologists and test for reproducibility in the measurement of the PLL, between 'readers'. A statistician calculated a minimum sample size of 30 subjects, in order to demonstrate significant change in the mean length of the PLL (acoustic target area), in any of the two positions. This estimation was based on data derived from a similar study, which had used a minimum sample size of 16 subjects, with a 1 mm mean change in 'needle target area' dimensions, a 1 mm standard deviation (SD), and an alpha of 0.05 with a power of 90 % \[1, 2\].

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Effects of; Anesthesia, Spinal and Epidural, in Pregnancy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EPD Measurements

Intervention:

PLL Length Measured through US will be done with the subject placed on the Epidural Positioning Device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PLL Length Measured through US

Intervention Type DEVICE

The PLL will be measured for each allocated position: EPD or Flexed Position

Flexed Position Measurements

Intervention:

PLL Length Measured through US will be done with the subject placed in a "flexed" lumbar spine position.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PLL Length Measured through US

Intervention Type DEVICE

The PLL will be measured for each allocated position: EPD or Flexed Position

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PLL Length Measured through US

The PLL will be measured for each allocated position: EPD or Flexed Position

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PLL length

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female Patients
* Term Pregnancy (\>37 weeks)
* 18 years or older
* Non-labouring patients, admitted for a cesarean delivery

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy to ultrasound jelly
* Spinal Deformities
* Active Labour
* Presence of Epidural Catheter for Labour Analgesia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Indu Singh, MD, FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Western University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jones AR, Carle C, Columb M. Effect of table tilt on ligamentum flavum length measured using ultrasonography in pregnant women*. Anaesthesia. 2013 Jan;68(1):27-30. doi: 10.1111/anae.12006. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23088766 (View on PubMed)

Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, Conradi R, Martin EO, Motsch J. Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging. J Clin Anesth. 2001 May;13(3):213-7. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00245-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11377160 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

107422

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.