The Impact of Needle Manipulation and Accuracy Between Hand Held Automatic and Traditional Ultrasound Device
NCT ID: NCT05909085
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-07-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Palpatory and Preprocedural Ultrasound Guided Techniques on Performance of Spinal Anesthesia
NCT01865955
Accuracy of Depth and Landmark Assessment Using Neuraxial Ultrasound Devices
NCT02656446
Ultrasound Evaluation of Labor Epidural
NCT04056403
Does Ultrasound Help Junior Anesthesia Residents With Placement of Labor Analgesia in Pregnant Patients
NCT02747238
Agreement Between Laterality of Tsui Test and Laterality of Color Flow Doppler Signals During Labor Epidural Analgesia
NCT05281991
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Number of needle insertion attempts: defined as advancement of the needle through the skin in an effort to enter the epidural space; a needle requiring withdrawal from the skin for reinsertion is to be counted as an additional insertion attempt. Time to landmark identification: defined as the time interval between the start of needle puncture site identification and the time to first needle puncture attempt. The start time of needle puncture site identification in both the LT and UST corresponds to when the resident physician first places his/her hand on the patient to palpate the back. In both groups, all materials, supplies, and equipment will be prepared and readily available prior to the start of the procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Handheld traditional ultrasound
Traditional US will be used to compare number of needle manipulations to the handheld US.
Traditional ultrasound
Labor epidural will be performed after marking patient skin using traditional ultrasound guidance
Handheld Automated ultrasound
Automated device provides automatic information pertaining to distance to epidural space distance and interspace location.
Automated ultrasound
Labor epidural will be performed after marking patient skin using an automated ultrasound device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Traditional ultrasound
Labor epidural will be performed after marking patient skin using traditional ultrasound guidance
Automated ultrasound
Labor epidural will be performed after marking patient skin using an automated ultrasound device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with no known back deformities
* Ability to sit upright for epidural placement
* No prior lumbar surgery
* No allergies to ultrasound gel
Exclusion Criteria
* Low platelet count
* Allergies to local anesthetics
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antonio Gonzalez, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vallejo MC, Phelps AL, Singh S, Orebaugh SL, Sah N. Ultrasound decreases the failed labor epidural rate in resident trainees. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Oct;19(4):373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
Carvalho B, Seligman KM, Weiniger CF. The comparative accuracy of a handheld and console ultrasound device for neuraxial depth and landmark assessment. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
Weiniger CF, Carvalho B, Ronel I, Greenberger C, Aptekman B, Almog O, Kagan G, Shalev S. A randomized trial to investigate needle redirections/re-insertions using a handheld ultrasound device versus traditional palpation for spinal anesthesia in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022 Feb;49:103229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103229. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
Seligman KM, Weiniger CF, Carvalho B. The Accuracy of a Handheld Ultrasound Device for Neuraxial Depth and Landmark Assessment: A Prospective Cohort Trial. Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1995-1998. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002407.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
No NIH funding 09.05.23
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2000034863
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.