The Impact of Needle Manipulation and Accuracy Between Hand Held Automatic and Traditional Ultrasound Device

NCT ID: NCT05909085

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-07-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this double blinded randomized controlled trial, the investigators would like to compare the effects on needle manipulation when relatively inexperienced sonographist (\< 1 year of ultrasound experience) perform ultrasound guided labor epidurals utilizing a traditional handheld ultrasound versus a handheld device that was engineered to provide automated guidance. The primary outcome of this study would be number of needle passes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patient will be approached upon admission to labor and delivery floor (Standard of care). The study will be presented to the patient and if they agree, they will be consented. (Study). Upon epidural patient request patient will be randomized to A-US vs B-US based on the randomization table. Ten envelopes will be available with the randomization choice. (Study). The resident will walk in with both US devices into the room (for patient blinding) and perform scan with the device the randomization table called for. (Study). After performing scan and markings of the patients back, the research fellow or clinical fellow will be called into the room to evaluate the number of needle manipulation and provide surveys related to patient and labor analgesia satisfaction. (Study).

Number of needle insertion attempts: defined as advancement of the needle through the skin in an effort to enter the epidural space; a needle requiring withdrawal from the skin for reinsertion is to be counted as an additional insertion attempt. Time to landmark identification: defined as the time interval between the start of needle puncture site identification and the time to first needle puncture attempt. The start time of needle puncture site identification in both the LT and UST corresponds to when the resident physician first places his/her hand on the patient to palpate the back. In both groups, all materials, supplies, and equipment will be prepared and readily available prior to the start of the procedure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labor Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Handheld traditional ultrasound

Traditional US will be used to compare number of needle manipulations to the handheld US.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Labor epidural will be performed after marking patient skin using traditional ultrasound guidance

Handheld Automated ultrasound

Automated device provides automatic information pertaining to distance to epidural space distance and interspace location.

Group Type OTHER

Automated ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Labor epidural will be performed after marking patient skin using an automated ultrasound device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Traditional ultrasound

Labor epidural will be performed after marking patient skin using traditional ultrasound guidance

Intervention Type DEVICE

Automated ultrasound

Labor epidural will be performed after marking patient skin using an automated ultrasound device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA-1, ASA-2, and ASA-3
* Patients with no known back deformities
* Ability to sit upright for epidural placement
* No prior lumbar surgery
* No allergies to ultrasound gel

Exclusion Criteria

* Coagulopathy
* Low platelet count
* Allergies to local anesthetics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antonio Gonzalez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Antonio Gonzalez, MD

Role: CONTACT

4133869415

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vallejo MC, Phelps AL, Singh S, Orebaugh SL, Sah N. Ultrasound decreases the failed labor epidural rate in resident trainees. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Oct;19(4):373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Aug 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20696564 (View on PubMed)

Carvalho B, Seligman KM, Weiniger CF. The comparative accuracy of a handheld and console ultrasound device for neuraxial depth and landmark assessment. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30770208 (View on PubMed)

Weiniger CF, Carvalho B, Ronel I, Greenberger C, Aptekman B, Almog O, Kagan G, Shalev S. A randomized trial to investigate needle redirections/re-insertions using a handheld ultrasound device versus traditional palpation for spinal anesthesia in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022 Feb;49:103229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103229. Epub 2021 Sep 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34670725 (View on PubMed)

Seligman KM, Weiniger CF, Carvalho B. The Accuracy of a Handheld Ultrasound Device for Neuraxial Depth and Landmark Assessment: A Prospective Cohort Trial. Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1995-1998. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002407.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28858898 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

No NIH funding 09.05.23

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2000034863

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.