Reproductive Outcome Affected by Two Adjunctive Treatments in Patients With Severe Intrauterine Adhesions

NCT ID: NCT02708277

Last Updated: 2016-05-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

93 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of loop intrauterine contraceptive device and heart-shaped intrauterine balloon for the adjunctive treatment of severe intrauterine adhesions in patients with infertility.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intrauterine adhesion, also known as Asherman's syndrome, is the partial or complete occlusion of the uterine cavity as a result of endometrium damage. Most intrauterine adhesions patients manifest amenorrhea, reduced menstrual pattern, infertility, and intrauterine growth restriction, which seriously affect their reproductive health. Currently, hysteroscopy is the preferred method of intrauterine adhesions diagnosis and treatment. However, because intrauterine adhesions patients generally have poor endometrium repair capability, the incidence rate of reformation of intrauterine adhesions ranging from 20%-62.5% in those with severe adhesions. The successful pregnancy rate after treatment in severe Asherman's syndrome is reported to be consistently lower, only 33%. The prevention of intrauterine adhesions recurrence after trans-cervical resection of adhesion is clinically important but difficult. Therefore, this study was conducted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asherman's Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

At the end of the procedure the surgery loop-shaped intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) was placed in the uterine cavity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

loop-shaped intrauterine contraceptive device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intrauterine contraceptive device can temporary protective layer between the endometrium wound during the most critical three weeks after the surgery to prevent adhesion reformation.

Group B

At the end of the procedure the surgery an intrauterine balloon (Cook Medical) was placed in the uterine cavity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intrauterine balloon (Cook Medical)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The balloons used in this study is heart- shaped that resembled the shape of the uterine cavity and could fully separate the two sides of the uterine wall and the corners of the uterus compare to loop-shaped intrauterine contraceptive device.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

loop-shaped intrauterine contraceptive device

Intrauterine contraceptive device can temporary protective layer between the endometrium wound during the most critical three weeks after the surgery to prevent adhesion reformation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

intrauterine balloon (Cook Medical)

The balloons used in this study is heart- shaped that resembled the shape of the uterine cavity and could fully separate the two sides of the uterine wall and the corners of the uterus compare to loop-shaped intrauterine contraceptive device.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of severe intrauterine adhesions
* infertility

Exclusion Criteria

* endometrial tuberculosis
* grossly abnormal semen analysis
* ovarian failure, hydrosalpinx fluid
* patients who did not proceed to second-look hysteroscopy within the specified time frame
* Women with no desire to pregnancy
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yuqing Chen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yuqing Chen

Associate chief physician

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shuzhong Yao, professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Orhue AA, Aziken ME, Igbefoh JO. A comparison of two adjunctive treatments for intrauterine adhesions following lysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Jul;82(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00030-4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12834941 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IUA-21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fertility Post Placenta Accrete
NCT02821702 COMPLETED NA