Does Adding Spinal Anaesthesia to a General Anaesthetic Technique Influence Readiness for Discharge in Patients Having Hand Assisted Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy
NCT ID: NCT02700217
Last Updated: 2020-03-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
101 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-16
2019-03-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators plan to investigate whether adding a spinal anaesthetic to a conventional general anaesthetic technique actually influences clinical outcomes of length of hospital stay and acute pain in patients undergoing hand assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.
The investigators plan to randomise 90 patients undergoing hand assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy over 24 month period at Central Manchester University hospitals and divide them in two groups of 45 each. Group A will receive a general anaesthetic (GA) with spinal anaesthesia (Spinal group) and Group B will receive a GA with a rectus sheath block (Rectus sheath group) and local anaesthetic infiltration
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intravenous Lignocaine Infusion in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy
NCT04052867
Subcostal TAP Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine in Donor Nephrectomy Patients: A Prospective Study
NCT02287623
Randomized Study of Spinal Anesthesia Compared With Traditional Epidural Anesthesia Concerning Peroperative and Postoperative Pain After Open Nephrectomy in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma
NCT02030717
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block During Kidney Transplant Surgery
NCT02080728
Spinal Bupivacaine/Morphine in Laparoscopic Gastro-intestinal Surgery
NCT02284282
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spinal Anaesthesia
2.5ml of heavy 0.5% Bupivacaine, 400mg of Diamorphine (Spinal Anaesthesia) \& IV infusion of Remifentanil 0.2-0.3ug/kg/min, Propofol 2-3mg/kg and 0.2 mg/kg of Cistracurium (General Anaesthesia)
Bupivacaine and Diamorphine
Remifentanil, Propofol and Cistracurium
Rectus Sheath Injection
50ml of 0.25% I-Bupivacaine max 2mg/kg (IV block Anaesthesia) injected into rectus sheath bilaterally \& IV infusion of Remifentanil 0.2-0.3ug/kg/min, Propofol 2-3mg/kg and 0.2 mg/kg of Cistracurium (General Anaesthesia)
Remifentanil, Propofol and Cistracurium
Bupivacaine and Rectus Sheath injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bupivacaine and Diamorphine
Remifentanil, Propofol and Cistracurium
Bupivacaine and Rectus Sheath injection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients aged between 18-65 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Allergy to bupivacaine
* Patients who have had previous abdominal surgery
* Patients having chronic pain or any medications for chronic pain
* Any patient in whom spinal anaesthesia is contra-indicated
* Patients on anti-platelet or anti-thrombotic therapy.
* Patient requiring interpreter
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bhatia K, Columb M, Wadsworth R, Macnab W, Jepegnanam C, Campbell T, Van Dellen D. Effect of rectus sheath block vs. spinal anaesthesia on time-to-readiness for hospital discharge after trans-peritoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A randomised trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;38(4):374-382. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001337.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R04134
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.