Intrathecal Ketamine, Dexmedetomidine and Both With Bupivacaine for Postoperative Abdominal Cancer Surgery Pain

NCT ID: NCT02455609

Last Updated: 2015-05-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Currently, opioids are widely used for pain relief, but they often provide sub-optimal analgesia with occasional serious side effects. Preservative-free ketamine hydrochloride was introduced as a spinal anesthetic more than twenty years ago and found to have advantages over local anesthetics. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine provides an analgesic effect in postoperative pain without severe sedation. The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy and safety of intrathecally administered dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or their combination when added to bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in major abdominal cancer surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was approved by the ethics committee of South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. After obtaining a written informed consent, 90 American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) I-II patients aged 30-50 years and scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery were included in the study. Patients with a known allergy to the study drugs, significant cardiac, respiratory, renal or hepatic disease, coagulation disorder, infection at the site of intrathecal injection, drug or alcohol abuse, BMI \> 30 kg/m2 , and psychiatric illnesses that would interfere with perception and assessment of pain were excluded from the study.

Preoperatively, patients were taught how to evaluate their own pain intensity using the visual analogue scale (VAS), scored from 0 -10 (where 0 = no pain, and 10 = the worst pain imaginable).

Oral diazepam (5 mg) was taken the night before surgery. Up on arrival at the operative theatre, a 16-gauge catheter was introduced intravenously at the dorsum of the hand; lactated Ringer's solution 10 mg/kg was infused intravenously over 10 min. before initiation of spinal anesthesia. Basic monitoring probes (electrocardiography, non invasive blood pressure, O2 saturation, and temperature) were applied. Patients were placed in the setting position and a 25-gauge Quincke needle was placed in the L2-3 or L3-4 interspaces.

Patients were randomly divided, by selecting sealed envelopes into one of three groups 30 patients each:

* The dexmedetomidine group (group I) received 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in 2 ml volume and 5µg of dexmedetomidine in 1 ml volume intrathecally.
* The ketamine group (group II) received 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in 2 ml volume and 0.1 mg/kg ketamine in 1ml volume intrathecally.
* Dexmedetomidine + Ketamine group (group III) received 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in 2 ml volume and 5µg of dexmedetomidine plus 0.1 mg/kg of Ketamine in 1 ml volume intrathecally.

Immediately after their intrathecal injection, the patients were placed in the supine position. After successful spinal anesthesia, general anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 1.5-2 µg/kg, propofol 2-3 mg/kg, and lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg. Endotracheal intubation was facilitated by cis-atracurium 0.15 mg/kg. Heart rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure were recorded at 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180 minutes. Anesthesia and muscle relaxation were maintained by isoflurane 1- 1.5 MAC in 50% oxygen/air mixture and cis-atracurium 0.03 mg/kg bolus given every 30 min. respectively.

At the end of surgery, muscle relaxation was reversed by neostigmine 50 µg/kg and atropine 20 µg/kg. Patients were extubated and transferred to postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and were monitored for vital signs (heart rate, non invasive blood pressure, respiratory rate, and O2 saturation) immediately postoperative and at 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperative.

VAS scores were assessed at the same time points. Rescue analgesia represented by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine with an initial bolus of 0.1 mg/kg once pain was expressed by the patient, or if VAS was 3 or more (VAS ≥ 3) followed by 1 mg boluses with a lockout period of 5 min. The time of first request of analgesia and total analgesic consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively were recorded.

The patient's level of sedation was assessed at the same time points using a modified Observer's Assessment of alertness/sedation (OAAS) scale (where 6 = agitated, and 0 = doesn't respond to deep stimuls).

The attendant anesthesiologist, the patient-care giver, and the data collection personnel were all blinded to patient assignment to a specific group. Postoperative adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, cardiac arrhythmias were recorded and treated.

Hypotension was defined as a 15% decrease in systolic blood pressure from baseline. Bradycardia was defined as a heart rate slower than 50 beats per minute or a decrease in heart rate of 20% or more from baseline; whichever is lowest. Hypoxia was defined as an oxygen saturation of less than 90%. Hypotension was treated with intravenous boluse of ephidrine 0.1 mg/kg and normal saline 5ml/kg; the same doses were repeated as required. Bradycardia was treated with intravenous atropine 0.01 mg/kg.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Therapy Pain Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

dexmedetomidine (I)

intrathecal drug administartion of 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in 2 ml volume and 5µg of dexmedetomidine in 1 ml volume.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

intrathecal drug administration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pre-emptive intrathecal administration of analgesic medications for control of postoperative pain.

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

ketamine (II)

intrathecal drug administartion of 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in 2 ml volume and 0.1 mg/kg ketamine in 1ml volume.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

intrathecal drug administration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pre-emptive intrathecal administration of analgesic medications for control of postoperative pain.

ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine + Ketamine group (III)

intrathecal drug administartion of patients in this arm received 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in 2 ml volume and 5µg of dexmedetomidine plus 0.1 mg/kg of Ketamine in 1 ml volume.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

intrathecal drug administration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pre-emptive intrathecal administration of analgesic medications for control of postoperative pain.

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intrathecal drug administration

pre-emptive intrathecal administration of analgesic medications for control of postoperative pain.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 30-50 years
* American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) I-II patients
* scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* known allergy to the study drugs.
* significant cardiac, respiratory, renal or hepatic disease
* coagulation disorder
* infection at the site of intrathecal injection
* drug or alcohol abuse
* BMI \> 30 kg/m2
* psychiatric illnesses that would interfere with perception and assessment of pain
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmad Mohammad Abd El-Rahman

Lecturer of anesthesia, intensive care, and pain management

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ahmad M Abd El-Rahman, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

210

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Perioperative Lidocaine and Ketamine in Abdominal Surgery
NCT04084548 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3