Measurement of Pulse Pressure Variation and Cardiac Output by a New Application for Android™ (Captesia™)

NCT ID: NCT02692222

Last Updated: 2016-12-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study test the agreement and accuracy of Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) and Cardiac Output (CO) obtained by the Android application Capstesia™ against the gold standard : PPV and CO calculated by thermodilution.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) remains a good predictor of fluid responsiveness in the OR. However, PPV can be time-consuming to calculate (manual determination), is not always displayed on monitoring screens nor reliable through visual assessment and needs additional devices to be displayed. A new Android application (Captesia) automatically calculates the PPV utilizing a digital photograph of the arterial waveform from the monitor. The application determines the PPV by selecting peaks and troughs of the arterial curve.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Bypass

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

pulse pressure variation monitoring Captesia cardiac output monitoring

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PPV

This study will track changes in PPV and CO before and after of volume expansion, which goal is to change the cardiac output.

Calculation of PPV and CO with two methods

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Calculation of PPV and CO with two methods

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation
* patients with valvular insufficiency
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Erasme University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Céline Boudart

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Céline F Boudart, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasme Hospital Bruxelles

Alexandre Joosten, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasme Hospital Bruxelles

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erasme Hospital

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yang X, Du B. Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014 Nov 27;18(6):650. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0650-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25427970 (View on PubMed)

Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology. 2011 Aug;115(2):231-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318225b80a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21705869 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B406201526827

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id