Effect of Peri-operative Supplemental Oxygen in Wound Infection After Appendectomy
NCT ID: NCT02687217
Last Updated: 2016-05-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2013-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Perioperative Hyperoxygenation and Wound Site Infection Following Surgery for Acute Appendicitis
NCT01002365
Supplemental Oxygen Reduces Surgical Infection
NCT00235456
Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen to Reduce Surgical Site Infection After High Energy Fracture Surgery
NCT01798810
Respiratory Effects of Perioperative Oxygen During General Anaesthesia
NCT00637936
Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen to Reduce the Incidence of Post-cesarean Wound Infection
NCT01340534
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
30 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and who voluntarily consented for the study were randomly allocated to the two groups- Group A (control group) and Group B (study group).
These patients were operated through Mc-Burney incision given in the right lower quadrant.
Both the groups were comparable in their demographic and preoperative profile. The study group was given ≥50% of oxygen intraoperatively and the control group was given no oxygen.
In postoperative period, oxygen was given to group A at the rate of 4 litre/minute (L/min) and group B at the rate of 6 litre/minute (L/min).
The assessment of the wound was done by using ASEPSIS (Additional treatment; Serous discharge; Erythema; Purulent exudate; Separation of deep tissues; Isolation of bacteria; and Stay) score. A score of more than 20 is considered to be infected.
Fever, raised total leucocyte count, positive pus culture, Ultrasound evidence of fluid collections, removal of sutures and duration of hospital stay were also measured for the evaluation of economic implications due to SSI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A: Control
Group A: Control- Received no supplemental oxygen throughout the surgery and received oxygen at 4l/min. in 2hrs postoperatively
No interventions assigned to this group
Group B: Test
Group B: Test- Received hyperoxygenation more than or equal to 50% throughout the surgery and received oxygen at 6l/min. upto 2 hrs postoperatively.
oxygen
Hyperoxygenation ≥50% of oxygen by mask(non-rebreathing) was given through out the surgery.
Received 6L/min of oxygen through venturimask upto 2 hours in post operative period.
Hyperoxygenation refers to provision of ≥50% of oxygen by mask(non-rebreathing) through out the surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
oxygen
Hyperoxygenation ≥50% of oxygen by mask(non-rebreathing) was given through out the surgery.
Received 6L/min of oxygen through venturimask upto 2 hours in post operative period.
Hyperoxygenation refers to provision of ≥50% of oxygen by mask(non-rebreathing) through out the surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Appendectomy through the Mc Burney incision.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Immunodeficiency disease.
3. Patients requiring midline incision.
4. Patients requiring general anaesthesia after failure of spinal anaesthesia.
5. Patients requiring higher oxygen in perioperative period.
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lady Hardinge Medical College
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Swati Sattavan
Senior Resident
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Swati Sattavan, M.S.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Hospitals
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LHMC/ECHR/2014/326
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.