Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel/ Depot 120 mg vs. Placebo in Subjects With Lung Neuroendocrine Tumours

NCT ID: NCT02683941

Last Updated: 2022-07-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

77 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-06

Study Completion Date

2020-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a Phase 3, prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, study evaluating the efficacy and safety of LAN plus BSC versus placebo plus BSC for the treatment of well-differentiated, metastatic and/or unresectable, typical or atypical bronchopulmonary NETs.

This study contains two phases: the Double-Blind (DB) Phase, and the Open Label (OL) Phase. The DB Phase includes: Screening, Baseline and Treatment period. The OL Phase will consist of two periods: Treatment Period and Follow-Up Period.

The primary objective will be to describe the antitumour efficacy of Lanreotide Autogel/Depot 120 mg (LAN) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) every 28 days, in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), measured by central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1 criteria, every 12 weeks, in subjects randomized to LAN with unresectable and/or metastatic well differentiated, typical or atypical bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumours.

Recent updates of National Cancer Institute Cancer Network (NCCN) \& European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) guidelines recommend SSA in first line for the treatment of locoregional unresectable or metastatic bronchopulmonary NETs as an option beyond 'observation' leading to slow and difficult recruitment in SPINET study. Consequently, it was decided to prematurely stop the recruitment in the SPINET study and to transition all subjects still treated in the double-blind phase to the open label (OL) treatment and follow-up phases following respective country approvals of Amendment #5.

The new aim of this Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled clinical study is to describe the antitumor efficacy and safety of Lanreotide Autogel/Depot 120 mg (LAN) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) in subjects with well-differentiated, metastatic and/or unresectable, typical or atypical, bronchopulmonary NETs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As planned initially, a total of 216 eligible patients with well-differentiated typical or atypical, metastatic and/or unresectable bronchopulmonary NETs, and a positive somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) (Octreoscan® ≥ grade 2 Krenning scale; Ga-PET scan: uptake greater than liver background), were to be randomized 2:1 to either LAN plus BSC (120mg/28 days) or placebo plus BSC following the stratification of 1) typical versus atypical and 2) prior chemotherapy versus no prior chemotherapy\*.

\* cytotoxic chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapy or interferon.

At the time of the premature stop of the recruitment (as per Protocol Amendment #5), 77 patients were enrolled. All patients still treated in the DB Phase were entered into the OL Phase (either for Follow up or for OL treatment periods). The transition to the OL periods was done on a country-basis and per patient, at the following planned scheduled visit (i.e. approximately 28 days from the last injection). Patients enrolled into the study not progressing at the time of study stop, and who agree to stay on LAN therapy (i.e. OL Treatment Period) receive the study active treatment until evidence of disease progression (based on local radiological assessment then confirmed centrally), development of unacceptable toxicity, or premature withdrawal for any reason or up a maximum of 18 months after the last patient randomized. After disease progression patients are followed for survival, QoL and all subsequent anticancer treatments in the OL Follow-up period up to the end of the study (i.e up to 18 months after the last patient randomized).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuroendocrine Tumors in Lung

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lanreotide (Autogel formulation)

120mg every 28 days until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lanreotide (Autogel formulation)

Intervention Type DRUG

120mg every 28 days until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity

Best Supportive Care

Intervention Type DRUG

Best Supportive Care is best available therapy at the choice of the investigator

Placebo

120mg every 28 days until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity during the double-blind phase. The patient may enter open-label phase for treatment with Lanreotide.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline solution 0.9% administered via deep subcutaneous injection every 28 days until disease progression.

Best Supportive Care

Intervention Type DRUG

Best Supportive Care is best available therapy at the choice of the investigator

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lanreotide (Autogel formulation)

120mg every 28 days until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Saline solution 0.9% administered via deep subcutaneous injection every 28 days until disease progression.

Intervention Type DRUG

Best Supportive Care

Best Supportive Care is best available therapy at the choice of the investigator

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lanreotide Depot (US) BSC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have metastatic and/or unresectable pathologically confirmed well-differentiated, typical or atypical neuroendocrine tumor of the bronchopulmonary
* Histologic evidence of Well differentiated Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the bronchopulmonary (typical and atypical according to the World Health Organisation (WHO criteria), evaluated locally)
* Has a mitotic index \<2 mitoses/2 mm2 for typical carcinoid (TC) and \<10 mitoses/2 mm2 and/or foci of necrosis for atypical carcinoid (AC)
* At least one measurable lesion of the disease on imaging (CT or MRI; RECIST 1.1)
* Positive Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) imaging

Exclusion Criteria

* Poorly differentiated or high grade carcinoma, or patients with neuroendocrine tumors not of bronchopulmonary origin
* Has been treated with a Somatostatin analog (SSA) at any time prior to randomization, except if that treatment was for less than 15 days (e.g. peri-operatively) of short acting SSA or one dose of long acting SSA and the treatment was received more than 6 weeks prior to randomization
* Has been treated with Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) at any time prior to randomization
* Has been treated with more than two lines of cytotoxic chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapy or interferon for bronchopulmonary NET
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ipsen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ipsen Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ipsen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arizona Oncology Associates

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

VA Greater Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Rocky Mountain Cancer Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Medical Center

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Dana-Farber Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Karmanos Cancer Center

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Roswell Park Cancer Center

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health and Science Center

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology-Forth Worth

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

AKH und Med. University Vienna Allg Krankenhaus Wien

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH

Wels, , Austria

Site Status

Tom Baker Cancer Center

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

QEII Health Sciences Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

McGill University Health Center

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon Cancer Centre

Saskatoon, , Canada

Site Status

Cancer Care of Manitoba

Winnipeg, , Canada

Site Status

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

NET-Centre, Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Edouard Herriot

Lyon, , France

Site Status

CLLC, Institut Paoli Calmettes

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM) Val d'Aurelle

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHU de Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Centre René Gauducheau ICO institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH

Bad Berka, , Germany

Site Status

Evangelische Lungenklinik Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR)

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Universita di Genova

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Insituti Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la cura dei Tumori (IRST)

Meldola, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Antonio Cardarelli

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Perugia Santa Maria della Misericordia

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Insittuto Clinico Humanitas

Rozzano, , Italy

Site Status

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht University Medical Center

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Zakladu Medycyny Nuklearne i Endokrynologii Onkologicznej

Gliwice, , Poland

Site Status

University Center of Ophtalmology & Oncology

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Szpital Uniwersytecki W

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Szpital Kliniczny im. H. Święcickiego U.M.

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

GAMMED

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

University Hospital Ramón y Cajal

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Cancer Center, Beatson Oncology

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Surrey County Hospital

Guildford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Free Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

King's College Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Christie Hospital

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Churchill Hospital

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Canada Denmark France Germany Italy Netherlands Poland Spain United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-004992-62

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

A-US-52030-328

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.