Tolerance of a Motorized Orthosis Reproducing Walking Movement vs Conventional Standing-up Devices in Child With CP
NCT ID: NCT02669160
Last Updated: 2024-03-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-30
2018-11-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In recent years, "exoskeleton" devices have been used on subjects with spinal cord injuries allowing motor performances improvement.
This pilot study aims evaluating CP children's tolerance to motorized orthosis reproducing walking pattern compared with conventional passive standing-up devices. For this clinical trial, the investigators compare the behavior of CP children using a motorized orthosis reproducing walking pattern (Innowalk Pro Small) to the behavior of same children placed in their usual conventional passive device. The investigators hypothesis is that the Innowalk improves joints range of motion, enhances selective motor control, decreases the medium-term spasticity and offers at least the same tolerance as conventional passive devices.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Ankle Foot Orthosis on Mobility, Participation and Adhesion in Childrend With Cerebral Palsy
NCT07301593
Evaluating a New Knee-Ankle-Foot Brace to Improve Gait in Children With Movement Disorders
NCT01961557
Augmenting Ankle Plantarflexor Function in Cerebral Palsy
NCT05154253
Side Pole Static Ankle Foot Orthosis in Children With Neurological Disorders
NCT03146598
Construction of a Reference Corridor to Assess the Value of Combining Innovative Morphological and Functional Analysis Techniques in Pediatric Patient Care Based on Different Pathological Models
NCT07251634
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental
Group of communicating CP children receiving a 30 minutes daily session of verticalization with a motorized orthosis reproducing walking movement (PS Innowalk)
PC Innowalk
Control
Group of communicating CP children receiving a 30 minutes daily session of verticalization with their conventional passive stander.
Conventional passive stander
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PC Innowalk
Conventional passive stander
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Communicating children
* Children who had never walked
Exclusion Criteria
* No social insurance affiliation
* Refuse to participate in the study
* Orthopaedic surgery in 6 months which precede the inclusion.
* Injection of botulinum toxin in the 6 months which precede the inclusion.
* Previous neurotomy
6 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Région Nord-Pas de Calais, France
OTHER
Initiatives de parents de Jeunes Epileptiques du Nord
UNKNOWN
Unité de Traitement des Signaux Biomédicaux - HEI
UNKNOWN
Made for Movement
OTHER
Lille Catholic University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean-François Catanzariti, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
GHICL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IEM Sévigné
Béthune, Hauts-de-France, France
IEM Vent de Bise
Liévin, Hauts-de-France, France
IEM Christian Dabbadie
Villeneuve-d'Ascq, Hauts-de-France, France
IEM Ellen Poidatz
Saint-Fargeau-Ponthierry, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC-P0032
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.