Tolerance of a Motorized Orthosis Reproducing Walking Movement vs Conventional Standing-up Devices in Child With CP

NCT ID: NCT02669160

Last Updated: 2024-03-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2018-11-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cerebral palsy (CP) includes all the sensorimotor development disorders leading to balance, gait and movement disruptions. These disorders are related to lesions of the central nervous system (CNS) that occurs at birth or during the early childhood. The therapeutic management of CP is essentially based on reeducation, but may also require specific medical treatments, orthopedic devices and sometimes bone surgery. Therefore, CP children are very often placed in specialized institutions with a significant socioeconomic impact. CP children suffer from various sensorimotor impairments, which may evolve into orthopedic deformations, justifying the implementation of restrictive devices. The French High Authority of Health (HAS) estimates that 50 % of CP children have pains when using contention or verticalization devices. These pains are mainly nociceptive and are caused by the passive constraint applied on contact points. Many clinical trials evaluating the physiotherapy benefits on CP patients have led to controversial results regarding the duration of the effect of this therapeutic approach. However, the improvement is more important when neuromuscular facilitation techniques are added to the reeducation program. Human neuronal adaptation and plasticity mechanisms are now understood, with the possibility of a potential partial recovery. Non-invasive stimulation methods and neurorehabilitation techniques could participate in the CNS re-calibration. Automated assisted movements have already been used and these processes showed an increase joint range of motion, bone density and decreased spasticity.

In recent years, "exoskeleton" devices have been used on subjects with spinal cord injuries allowing motor performances improvement.

This pilot study aims evaluating CP children's tolerance to motorized orthosis reproducing walking pattern compared with conventional passive standing-up devices. For this clinical trial, the investigators compare the behavior of CP children using a motorized orthosis reproducing walking pattern (Innowalk Pro Small) to the behavior of same children placed in their usual conventional passive device. The investigators hypothesis is that the Innowalk improves joints range of motion, enhances selective motor control, decreases the medium-term spasticity and offers at least the same tolerance as conventional passive devices.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CP (Cerebral Palsy)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Group of communicating CP children receiving a 30 minutes daily session of verticalization with a motorized orthosis reproducing walking movement (PS Innowalk)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PC Innowalk

Intervention Type DEVICE

Control

Group of communicating CP children receiving a 30 minutes daily session of verticalization with their conventional passive stander.

Group Type OTHER

Conventional passive stander

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PC Innowalk

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional passive stander

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* CP children from 6 to 16 years old, and being less than 150 cms, able to receive a 30 minutes verticalization session (standard practice) without sign of discomfort or intolerance
* Communicating children
* Children who had never walked

Exclusion Criteria

* Children presenting uncontrolled epileptic seizures
* No social insurance affiliation
* Refuse to participate in the study
* Orthopaedic surgery in 6 months which precede the inclusion.
* Injection of botulinum toxin in the 6 months which precede the inclusion.
* Previous neurotomy
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Région Nord-Pas de Calais, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Initiatives de parents de Jeunes Epileptiques du Nord

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Unité de Traitement des Signaux Biomédicaux - HEI

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Made for Movement

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lille Catholic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-François Catanzariti, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

GHICL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IEM Sévigné

Béthune, Hauts-de-France, France

Site Status

IEM Vent de Bise

Liévin, Hauts-de-France, France

Site Status

IEM Christian Dabbadie

Villeneuve-d'Ascq, Hauts-de-France, France

Site Status

IEM Ellen Poidatz

Saint-Fargeau-Ponthierry, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC-P0032

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.