Functional Electrical Stimulation During Walking in Cerebral Palsy

NCT ID: NCT03440632

Last Updated: 2021-10-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-01

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) often walk with insufficient ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase. A pathological gait, known as drop-foot gait, can be the result and this has 2 major complications: foot-slap during loading response and toe-drag during swing. This is partly caused by weakness of the anterior tibial muscle and partly due to co-contraction of both the fibular- and anterior tibial muscle. For classification of gait, the Winters scale can be used, where unilateral CP with dropfoot is classified as type I.

In daily life these problems cause limited walking distance and frequent falls, leading to restrictions in participating in daily life. The current guideline for spastic cerebral palsy describes the following therapies: 1) conservative therapy (physiotherapy, orthopaedic shoes and orthoses) 2) drugs suppressing spasticity 3) surgical interventions.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) may be an effective alternative treatment for children with spastic CP and a drop foot. By stimulating the fibular nerve or the anterior tibial muscle directly during the swing phase, dorsiflexion of the foot is stimulated. In contrast to bracing, FES does not restrict motion, but does produce muscle contraction, and thus has the potential to increase strength and motor control through repetitive neural stimulation over time.

In a systematic review the investigators found that FES immediately improves ankle dorsal flexion and reduces falls and these effects also sustain. However, it should be noted that the level of evidence is limited. Until now, the use of FES in CP is limited and no data exist about the effects on walking distance (activity level) and participation level.

The overall objective of this study is to conduct a randomised cross-over intervention trial in children with unilateral spastic CP with 12 weeks of FES (for every participant) and 18 weeks of conventional therapy. The effectiveness of FES will be examined at participation leven, using individual goal attainment. Next to that the effect at gait will be measured. An additional goal is to investigate the cost effectiveness of FES, which, in case of a positive effect, may support allowance by insurance companies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Children with spastic cerebral palsy often walk with insufficient ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase or with eversion of the foot. A pathological gait, known as drop-foot gait, can be the result and this has 2 major complications: foot-slap during loading response and toe-drag during swing. This is partly caused by weakness of the anterior tibial muscle and partly due to co-contraction of both the fibular- and anterior tibial muscle. In time, the disorder appears to be progressive due to atrophy and contractures of the muscle and increasing bodyweight. For classification of gait, the Winters scale can be used, where unilateral CP with dropfoot is classified as type I.

In daily life these problems cause limited walking distance and frequent falls. This can lead to restrictions in participating in daily activities at school and in leisure. The current guideline for spastic cerebral palsy describes the following therapies: 1) conservative therapy, which includes physiotherapy, orthopaedic shoes and orthoses. 2) systemically and locally applied drugs suppressing spasticity. 3) surgical interventions, e.g. tenotomy, transposition and osteotomy. In each intervention, there is the risk of side effects, such as sedation with oral medications, pressure sores and atrophy in a static orthosis, temporary effect in a Botulinum toxin A treatment and surgical complications due to a result of the surgery, and on the other hand as a result of the execution.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) may be an effective alternative treatment for children with spastic CP and a drop foot. By stimulating the fibular nerve or the anterior tibial muscle directly during the swing phase, dorsiflexion of the foot is stimulated. In contrast to bracing, FES does not restrict motion, but does produce muscle contraction, and thus has the potential to increase strength and motor control through repetitive neural stimulation over time.

In a systematic review the investigators found that FES immediately improves ankle dorsal flexion and falls. In addition, longer sustained effects of FES on ankle dorsal flexion and falls are found. However, it should be noted only two study studies (4 articles) were of level II class evidence (small RCT) and all other studies used a single subject design. Until now, the use of FES in CP is limited and no data exist about the effects on walking distance (activity level) and participation level.

The overall objective of this study is to conduct a randomised cross-over intervention trial in children with unilateral spastic CP with 12 weeks of FES for every participant and 18 weeks of conventional therapy. The effectiveness of FES will be examined at participation leven, using individual goal attainment. With every individual a goal at walking distance will be set, next to possible other goals. Next to that, results will be measured at the activity and functional level: the effect at gait kinematics (such as ankle dorsiflexion and balance), walking distance, falls, spasticity and muscle force. The type of brain damage of the patients is also taken in to account. An addition al goal is to investigate the cost effectiveness of FES, which, in case of a positive effect, may support allowance by insurance companies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebral Palsy Spastic Foot Drop

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

randomisation for the order of treatments and thereby for the total length of the 'conventional therapy phase'.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The physical examination and the advanced analysis of the 3D gait analysis will be done be a blinded examiner.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FES start

Start: 4 weeks 'adaptation phase' and 8 weeks 'FES phase'. Adaption phase: the stimulus (in Volt) will gradually be increased up to an effective level and the wear time has to be increased from 30 minutes to 6 hours a day. FES phase: the participants have to wear the FES device for minimal 6 hours a day during walking. Usual physiotherapy can be continued during the FES phase.

Second: after the FES phase, this group will enter the 'wash-out' period of 6 weeks for fading of the therapeutic effects, in which they return to their conventional therapy. Afterwards, 12 weeks of conventional therapy (orthoses/shoes and usual physiotherapy) with measurements at start and end will follow.

Group Type OTHER

FES

Intervention Type DEVICE

Functional electrical stimulation of the ankle dorsiflexors during walking, using a (superficial) neurostimulator with tilt sensor.

Conventional start

Start: wearing usual orthoses/shoes on a daily basis for the first 12 weeks of the study. Usual physiotherapy can be continued.

Second: after 12 weeks this group will enter a 6 week watch out phase, and next be switched to FES treatment for 12 weeks, consisting of: 4 weeks 'adaptation phase' with gradual increase of the treatment and 8 weeks 'FES phase'.

Group Type OTHER

FES

Intervention Type DEVICE

Functional electrical stimulation of the ankle dorsiflexors during walking, using a (superficial) neurostimulator with tilt sensor.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FES

Functional electrical stimulation of the ankle dorsiflexors during walking, using a (superficial) neurostimulator with tilt sensor.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Unilateral foot drop of central origin, particularly the absence of initial heel contact
* Participants are currently treated with ankle-foot orthoses or (adapted) shoes to wear on a daily basis
* Participants ambulate independently, and thus classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I or II and have a gait type 1 according to Winters et al (4).
* Participants are able to walk for at least 15 minutes
* Confirmed cerebral abnormality with MRI (showing medial infarction, maldevelopment of the brain, or porencephaly).
* Participants are aged 4-18 years at time of inclusion

Exclusion Criteria

* Plantarflexion ankle contracture of more than 5 degrees plantarflexion with the knee extended
* Botulinum toxin A injection to the plantar or dorsiflexor muscle groups within the 6 months before the study
* Orthopaedic surgery to the legs in the previous year
* Uncontrolled epilepsy with daily seizures
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

R.J. Vermeulen, prof M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maastricht University Medical Center

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Moll I, Vles JSH, Soudant DLHM, Witlox AMA, Staal HM, Speth LAWM, Janssen-Potten YJM, Coenen M, Koudijs SM, Vermeulen RJ. Functional electrical stimulation of the ankle dorsiflexors during walking in spastic cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017 Dec;59(12):1230-1236. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13501. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28815571 (View on PubMed)

Waters E, Davis E, Mackinnon A, Boyd R, Graham HK, Kai Lo S, Wolfe R, Stevenson R, Bjornson K, Blair E, Hoare P, Ravens-Sieberer U, Reddihough D. Psychometric properties of the quality of life questionnaire for children with CP. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Jan;49(1):49-55. doi: 10.1017/s0012162207000126.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17209977 (View on PubMed)

Moll I, Marcellis RGJ, Coenen MLP, Fleuren SM, Willems PJB, Speth LAWM, Witlox MA, Meijer K, Vermeulen RJ. A randomized crossover study of functional electrical stimulation during walking in spastic cerebral palsy: the FES on participation (FESPa) trial. BMC Pediatr. 2022 Jan 13;22(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-03037-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35027013 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL63250.068.17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.