Ciclesonide vs Fluticasone Nasal Sprays in Nasal Poplyposis

NCT ID: NCT02665806

Last Updated: 2016-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to compare ciclesonide nasal spray once daily with fluticasone propionate aquas nasal spray BD, which is commonly prescribed in patients with nasal polyposis, in order to relieve symptoms of these patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will be conducted in a tertiary ENT center in Tehran. Endoscopic severity grades for patients will be determined for polyps on the basis of 3 point classification system: 1, confined to middle meatus; 2, below level of middle turbinate; 3, causing total obstruction. Also, patients will be undergone paranasal sinus CT scan to determine Lund-Mackay stage which defined by sum of scores of each of 12 paranasal sinuses (0 for a completely lucent, 1 for a partially opaque and 2 for a completely opaque sinus). Patients will be randomized to treat in one of two groups: 1 month of therapy with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) 200 µg twice a day or 1 month of therapy with intranasal ciclesonide spray 200 µg once daily. All patients will be given written, easy to understand instruction about how to use nasal sprays. All included patients are asked to answer the disease specific Persian language validated SNOT20 quality of life questionnaire to evaluate symptom severity before starting the treatment. SNOT20 is a symptom severity and health related quality of life measure in sinonasal diseases that contains 20 questions about CRS related symptoms. Symptoms severity is scored 0, indicating no problem to 5, indicating worst possible symptom. Then scores of each of 20 items will be added to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 100. After one month of treatment patients will be visited by a blind physician to assess the symptoms. Then patients will answer the SNOT20 questionnaire again. Patients will be given a chance to report any problem during drug administration and enquired about adverse effects at the end of 1 month of treatment by the physician. Withdrawals is defined as any drug or study discontinuation due to adverse effects or lack of efficacy.

By considering 5% level of significance, to have 90% power to detect a clinically important difference of 0.6 points between two groups in improving total score of SNOT20 assuming a standard deviation (SD) of 0.6, we should include 22 cases in each study arm. To address a 10% probable loss to follow up, we would recruit 24 cases in each arm.

The continuous variables will be shown as mean ± SD. The categorical variables will be presented as frequency and percentage. The normality of measure outcome variables will be tested graphically as well as statistically with the Shapiro-Wilk test. In case of normal distribution we would use parametric t-test to compare the mean values between two groups. Otherwise we would use non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Chi-squared or Fischer-exact tests will be used to compare categorical variables. All the statistical analyses will be conducted using IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 23.0, (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Rhinosinustis With Polyps

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ciclesonide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ciclesonide

Intervention Type DRUG

intranasal ciclesonide spray 200 µg once daily

Fluticasone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fluticasone

Intervention Type DRUG

fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 µg twice a day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ciclesonide

intranasal ciclesonide spray 200 µg once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Fluticasone

fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 µg twice a day

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Individuals with the diagnosis of symptomatic nasal polyposis included.
* Objective confirmation of chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps was done by paranasal sinuses CT scan and Endoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Administration of systemic corticosteroids during last 3 months Administration of antihistamines, nasal steroids 15 days prior the including to the study.
* History of surgical treatment during last 3 month.
* History of septal deviation, severe epistaxis, cystic fibrosis, severe or non-controlled asthma, current purulent nasal infection, allergic rhinitis.
* Hypersensitivity or contraindication to steroids.
* Any positive history that was suspected to influence study parameters.
* NP requiring systemic corticosteroids or daily use of saline irrigations.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohsen Naraghi

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohsen Naraghi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran, Iran

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Salar Tofighi, MD

Role: CONTACT

+989124109390

Saeed Soleymanjahi, MD

Role: CONTACT

+989143919441

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IR.TUMS.REC.1394.1586

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CST1-Guided Oral Glucocorticoids Management for CRSwNP
NCT05598411 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4