Using an Electronic Nose to Predict Gastrointestinal Consequences of Pelvic Radiotherapy
NCT ID: NCT02649491
Last Updated: 2018-01-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-11-30
2019-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In a very small study, it has been successfully shown that using an electronic nose to sniff a stool sample does seem to identify people before they have had any radiotherapy - who will go on to get serious bowel side effects of radiotherapy. If this finding is correct, this is very important as it would allow the cancer doctors the option to change the way they give radiotherapy if they knew that a person was at very high risk of serious side effects from the treatment and to start treatment for the side effects at a much earlier stage.
In this study the investigators want to confirm in a larger study whether the previous findings are correct, and to see whether similar results can be obtained by sniffing urine rather than stool (that would be much easier for everyone) and identify exactly which part of the complicated "smell" signature is different in the people who will get side effects. This may lead for the investigators to able to identify why people are making this specific smell and then do something about changing the smell before treatment starts. The likeliest cause for the production of a smell which predisposes to side effects is a specific group of germs living in the bowel. If these germs can be identified, then there are many possible ways of changing these germ populations in advance of radiotherapy.
Enormous improvements have been made in treating cancer in recent years leading to hugely improved survival, however, treatment not infrequently can lead to side effects. Of all the possible long term physical side effects of cancer treatment, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are the most common and can have a great impact on daily activity. It is becoming increasingly clear that development of side effects in the bowel is not just related to the dose and way the radiotherapy is delivered.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validating Low FDG Dose PET/CT Compared to Current Standard of Care Dose PET/CT
NCT03519659
The Role of FDG PET in Radiation Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancers
NCT00230269
An International Study on the Use of PET/CT in Radiotherapy Planning in Low and Middle Income Countries
NCT02247713
Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Breast Cancer
NCT00001385
The Use of Breathing Synchronized PET/CT Imaging In the Detection and Quantification of FDG Uptake in Lung Nodules
NCT00598065
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
During treatment for the cancer, GI symptoms are common and their causes are poorly researched despite their impact on patients' quality of life and the fact that when they occur they often require dose reduction or cessation of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with potential impact on outcome. In addition, the GI side effect may not settle once anti-cancer treatment is stopped. In patients receiving radiotherapy for a tumor in the pelvis, more severe acute reactions predispose to worse long term side effects.
At least 17,000 British patients are treated annually with radiotherapy for pelvic cancer. Up to 80% of these patients are left with chronic alteration in GI function, 50% state that this affects their daily activity and 30% that this change in function has a moderate or severe effect. While progress has been made in defining optimal management of chronic changes in bowel function after cancer treatment and UK multi-professional guidance to aid clinicians has been published it would be extremely valuable to be able to predict those in advance who might go on to develop serious problems as a result of radiotherapy so as to have the opportunity to provide them with pre-treatment counseling, potentially modify the cancer treatment and introduce toxicity modifying therapies at the earliest opportunity.
It is widely believed that technical advances in the delivery of radiotherapy will abolish GI problems however, recent compelling data demonstrate that 30% of patients treated with "perfect" radiotherapy - meeting every described constraint still develop significant un-predicted problems. While mechanisms by which gastrointestinal symptoms occur after cancer treatment are starting to be understood and personal parameters which change the risk profile for individuals are being identified (body mass index, concomitant chemotherapy, use of a statin or ACE inhibitor, the presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, connective tissue disorders or HIV infection) the reasons why some patients remain symptom free whilst others experience severe side effects remains under researched.
It has become clear that development of GI toxicity is not solely related to the dose and way the radiotherapy is delivered, and a phenomenon independent of the radiation called the 'the consequential effect' is a second reason why some people get chronic side effects after radiotherapy. An important driver of the 'consequential effect' is increasingly believed to be the microbiota, the vast numbers of bacteria that live in our guts. The gastrointestinal microbiota are a complex ecosystem of up to 1,000 bacterial species in any one individual. The species vary greatly between individuals but within each individual, the flora composition remains stable for the majority of the species over time. The diversity of the microbiota is high in healthy people and low in people with GI side effects after pelvic radiotherapy, a process which very closely parallels findings in people with other much more intensively researched inflammatory conditions of the bowel.
Normal gut flora produce gases from their metabolites (Volatile Organic Compounds or VOCs). The gold standard for analyzing volatile organic compounds is gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCMS).
GCMS analyses gasses to identify all chemical components of that gas. However, this is very expensive and requires a specialized laboratory to process the samples hence is not a viable option in day to day clinical practice.
Two alternative techniques can be applied to analyse those VOCs: electronic sensing (e-nose) or High Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS).
Electronic sensing techniques are applied via an instrument (electronic nose) that attempts to replicate the biological olfactory system, by investigating samples as a whole, instead of identifying specific chemicals within a complex sample. The air above the sample (head space) is drawn into the e-nose and passed across an array of chemical sensors. The size of the array varies, but most are between 6 and 32 sensors. As each sensor is dissimilar, the interaction between the sensor and the sample is unique and an olfactory signature for this complex odor can be created.
Fields Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectometry (FAIMS) is a new technology capable of separating gas phase ions at atmospheric pressure and at room temperature. As with the electronic nose, FAIMS can be used for the real time analysis of complex chemical components, looking at the total chemical composition of a sample. Differences in the way the ionised molecules move in high electric fields are used to draw a mobility signature of a complex sample.
The e-nose and FAIMS techniques have been used successfully in small studies to diagnose lung disease, diabetes, bladder cancer, tuberculosis, cyanide poisoning, renal failure and schizophrenia. Focusing on gastrointestinal disorders, consistent changes in the VOCs produced by patients with inflammatory bowel disease, bile acid malabsorption, gastrointestinal cancer, coeliac disease, Clostridium difficile infection can be identified compared to healthy individuals.
In a paper published in 2012 of a retrospective blinded pilot study using the e-nose in 23 patients in whom the investigators analysed stool samples collected immediately before the start of radiotherapy. Of the 23 patients selected, 11 subsequently had minimal or no side effects from radiotherapy and 12 had severe toxicity. The e-nose analysed the samples and astonishingly identified with 100% accuracy two completely distinct groups of patients: those who would develop severe toxicity during radiotherapy and those who would not. The results of this study suggest that the substantial differences in the volatile gases produced by stool samples in the two populations, have a critical impact on toxicity and the reason that different fermentation products occur is either because the microbiological composition of stool differs between the two groups, or because bacterial function is somehow different. Whatever the reason, these findings suggests that the microbiota plays a critical role in the initiation of radiation induced inflammation are completely consistent with findings from other studies using very complex methodologies and with studies investigating the role of the microbiota in other GI conditions .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cohort Observation
Study participation will be offered to women, newly diagnosed with a gynecological malignancy who are due to be treated with pelvic radiotherapy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients to be treated with radical, adjuvant or neo-adjuvant radiotherapy for a new diagnosis of a gynaecological cancer.
* Ability of the patient to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are pregnant
* Patients unable to give informed consent
* Patients being treated privately
* Patients due to have their post-treatment follow-up elsewhere in the country
* Patients on studies with conflicting end-points
18 Years
90 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Warwick
OTHER
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jervoise Dr Andreyev, MA, Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4201
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.