Integrated Care for Patients With High Risk Substance Use and Psychiatric Disorder With Chronic Direct Acting Antiviral Treatment

NCT ID: NCT02648022

Last Updated: 2016-05-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

83 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine the effect of an integrated care protocol on antiviral treatment and sustained virologic response (SVR) rates following initiation of direct acting antiviral therapies (DAA) treatments in 2011.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and aims: Approval of direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapies in 2011 initiated a new era of more effective treatments for hepatitis C (HCV). The impact of more effective therapies on patient access to treatment is unknown. Integrated Care (IC) involving patient case management may overcome barriers to treatment access imposed by psychiatric and substance use disorders (SUD).

Methods: Prospective, randomized trial at a single medical center. Patients with HCV at risk for active psychiatric and SUD between Jan 2012 and Jan 2013 were recruited and randomized to IC or Usual Care (UC). A mid-level mental health practitioner was placed in the IC clinic and provided brief mental health care and case management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis C Depression PTSD Substance Use Disorder Fibrosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Integrated Care

Consisted of brief mental health interventions and case management provided in a collaborative treatment environment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Brief mental health interventions and case management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The mental health practitioner (MHP) provided brief interventions and follow up sessions designed to reduce the risk factors that are barriers to successful antiviral treatment (substance use, depression, PTSD. Second, MHP provided ongoing case management services to these patients, with an emphasis on navigating the complex HCV care process, preparation for antiviral treatment, and managing the treatment process (adherence, side effects, etc). Third, the MHP also activated the patient and facilitate the medication management of depression and other psychiatric disorders when possible by collaborating with the prescribing HCV physicians.

Usual Care

The usual care group received "standard of care" required for HCV patients as currently performed in each clinic. All usual care patients were evaluated by their HCV Clinic treatment team, usually consisting of clinical nursing staff, the treating physician, and a clinic psychiatrist or psychologist

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Brief mental health interventions and case management

The mental health practitioner (MHP) provided brief interventions and follow up sessions designed to reduce the risk factors that are barriers to successful antiviral treatment (substance use, depression, PTSD. Second, MHP provided ongoing case management services to these patients, with an emphasis on navigating the complex HCV care process, preparation for antiviral treatment, and managing the treatment process (adherence, side effects, etc). Third, the MHP also activated the patient and facilitate the medication management of depression and other psychiatric disorders when possible by collaborating with the prescribing HCV physicians.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with HCV infection who were referred to the VA HCV clinic and who received the usual initial evaluation in the clinic
* All patients 18 and 75 years old with confirmed HCV infection
* Patients were required to be classified as "high risk candidates for antiviral treatment" on any one of a set of screening measure in order to participate
* Screening measures and cutoffs for inclusion were depression:

* Beck Depression Inventory: (BDI) \> 10
* Alcohol use: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) \> 4
* PTSD: VA Primary Care PTSD Screen = endorsement of three or more items or any single endorsement of item #3
* Drug use: Drug Use Questionnaire = self-reported drug/alcohol use within 6 months prior to screen

Exclusion Criteria

* Lacked a confirmed test of HCV RNA
* Had HIV/HCV co-infection and received care at San Diego or Palo Alto sites (these patients were treated in a separate clinic)
* Had Hepatitis B (HBV) co-infection
* Had decompensated liver disease with active or recent encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, or ascites or Child-Pugh class B or C
* Had other significant near term life-threatening diseases
* Were treatment non-responders with pegylated Interferon plus ribavirin
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Samuel B Ho, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIR 07-101-A

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study to Reduce Intravenous Exposures (STRIVE)
NCT00391482 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Hepatitis C Self-Management
NCT00328042 COMPLETED NA