PASCAL Laser Platform Produces Less Pain Responses Compared To Conventional Laser System

NCT ID: NCT02645383

Last Updated: 2016-01-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the severity of expressed pain scores in patients with PDR who underwent either PASCAL or conventional laser and to assess the association between patient characteristics and severity of pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is a severe complication of diabetes mellitus characterized by new vessel formation in the retina and optic disc. Tight glycemic control and laser treatment in the early phases of the disease may slow the progression of PDR. Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is a laser-based treatment modality that destroys the outer retina layers and thereby improves the oxygen supply of the inner retina. During the following years, sequential improvements took place, including introduction of yellow, green, and diode lasers with various advantages of each wavelength.

In 2006, a novel semi-automatic and multi-shot photocoagulator called as PASCAL (Pattern scan laser, Opti-Medica Corp., Santa Clara, California, USA) was introduced with a reduction in pulse duration of each laser spot from typical 100 ms down to 10-30 millisecond. Compared with the conventional laser, shorter pulses have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of damage to the adjacent retinal tissues.

Almost all patients experience pain during PRP. While some patients may tolerate the pain, the majority does not. One study reported that 64.1% of patients did not complete treatment due to pain and therefore had an increased risk of vision loss. To improve patient compliance, several anesthetic and analgesic techniques such as peribulbar anesthesia, oral anesthesia and topical eye drops have been used. The patient comfort, and thus compliance, may be improved by using the shorter exposure burns, avoiding red or infrared wavelengths with deeper penetration, and by decreasing overall treatment time.

The aim of the current study was to compare the severity of expressed pain scores in patients with PDR who underwent either PASCAL or conventional laser.

As a method of this study, both eyes were treated within the same session and while one eye was treated with PASCAL laser, the other was treated with conventional laser (ELLEX Integre, Adailade, Australia) with 30 minutes resting intervals. To avoid a bias about orientation or becoming accustomed to laser procedure, PASCAL laser was performed in the first eyes in half of the patients (14 patients) and conventional laser was performed in the first eyes in the other half of the patients randomly. While the spot size used to obtain a white-grayish spot on the retina was 200-400 µm in both PASCAL and conventional laser, the pulse duration was 100 ms with conventional laser and 30ms with PASCAL laser. In order to accurately and reliable compare the grade of pain between each procedures, the retinal areas and total number of spots were standardized. Similar numbers of laser spots were created by two laser systems in same retinal quadrants in both eyes. Ten minutes after the procedure ended the severity of pain was assessed using a verbal rating scale and a visual analog scale (VAS). In the verbal scale the patient rates the pain on a Likert scale verbally, e.g. "none", "mild pain", "moderate pain", "severe pain" or "very severe pain" in five grading system (0-4) and in the VAS they specify the severity of pain by indicating a position along a continuous line from 0 to 10. Using these scores, relationship between severity of pain and patient characteristics including history of prior PRP treatment (experience), gender and duration of diabetes mellitus were assessed. Patients were assigned either in the experienced or non-experienced groups depending on history of prior PRP.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Retinopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PASCAL group

Patients undergone PASCAL laser photocoagulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PASCAL laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

A novel semi-automatic and multi-shot photocoagulator called as PASCAL (Pattern scan laser, Opti-Medica Corp., Santa Clara, California, USA) was introduced with a reduction in pulse duration of each laser spot from typical 100 ms down to 10-30 millisecond. Compared with the conventional laser, shorter pulses have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of damage to the adjacent retinal tissues. One eye was treated with PASCAL laser, the other was treated with conventional laser with 30 minutes resting intervals. To avoid a bias about orientation or becoming accustomed to laser procedure, PASCAL laser was performed in the first eyes in half of the patients (14 patients) randomly.

Conventional group

Patients undergone conventional laser photocoagulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

Maintaining of good glycemic regulation and performing panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) with conventional laser device (ELLEX Integre, Adailade, Australia) when it is indicated are evidence based effective methods for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.One eye was treated with conventional laser, the other was treated with PASCAL laser with 30 minutes resting intervals. To avoid a bias about orientation or becoming accustomed to laser procedure, conventional laser was performed in the first eyes in half of the patients (14 patients) randomly.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PASCAL laser

A novel semi-automatic and multi-shot photocoagulator called as PASCAL (Pattern scan laser, Opti-Medica Corp., Santa Clara, California, USA) was introduced with a reduction in pulse duration of each laser spot from typical 100 ms down to 10-30 millisecond. Compared with the conventional laser, shorter pulses have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of damage to the adjacent retinal tissues. One eye was treated with PASCAL laser, the other was treated with conventional laser with 30 minutes resting intervals. To avoid a bias about orientation or becoming accustomed to laser procedure, PASCAL laser was performed in the first eyes in half of the patients (14 patients) randomly.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional laser

Maintaining of good glycemic regulation and performing panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) with conventional laser device (ELLEX Integre, Adailade, Australia) when it is indicated are evidence based effective methods for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.One eye was treated with conventional laser, the other was treated with PASCAL laser with 30 minutes resting intervals. To avoid a bias about orientation or becoming accustomed to laser procedure, conventional laser was performed in the first eyes in half of the patients (14 patients) randomly.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients (\>18 years) with type 1 or 2 diabetes and bilateral high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a history of focal/grid photocoagulation, a history of orbital trauma, orbital infection or surgery, those with corneal or lens opacities, those with vitreous hemorrhage and non-compliant patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kocatepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Umit Ubeyt INAN

Professor Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Umit U Inan, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kocatepe University Medical School Department of Ophthalmology

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aiello LP, Gardner TW, King GL, Blankenship G, Cavallerano JD, Ferris FL 3rd, Klein R. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 1998 Jan;21(1):143-56. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.1.143. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9538986 (View on PubMed)

Feman SS, Chen J, Burroughs TE. Change in diabetic panretinal photocoagulation incidence. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012 Jul 1;43(4):270-4. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20120618-02.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22788579 (View on PubMed)

Jain A, Blumenkranz MS, Paulus Y, Wiltberger MW, Andersen DE, Huie P, Palanker D. Effect of pulse duration on size and character of the lesion in retinal photocoagulation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;126(1):78-85. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18195222 (View on PubMed)

Blumenkranz MS, Yellachich D, Andersen DE, Wiltberger MW, Mordaunt D, Marcellino GR, Palanker D. Semiautomated patterned scanning laser for retinal photocoagulation. Retina. 2006 Mar;26(3):370-6. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200603000-00024. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16508446 (View on PubMed)

Zakrzewski PA, O'Donnell HL, Lam WC. Oral versus topical diclofenac for pain prevention during panretinal photocoagulation. Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.022. Epub 2009 Apr 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19376588 (View on PubMed)

Wu WC, Hsu KH, Chen TL, Hwang YS, Lin KK, Li LM, Shih CP, Lai CC. Interventions for relieving pain associated with panretinal photocoagulation: a prospective randomized trial. Eye (Lond). 2006 Jun;20(6):712-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701989. Epub 2005 Jul 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16021194 (View on PubMed)

Alvarez-Verduzco O, Garcia-Aguirre G, Lopez-Ramos Mde L, Vera-Rodriguez S, Guerrero-Naranjo JL, Morales-Canton V. Reduction of fluence to decrease pain during panretinal photocoagulation in diabetic patients. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 Jul-Aug;41(4):432-6. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20100525-02. Epub 2010 May 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20608612 (View on PubMed)

Schuele G, Rumohr M, Huettmann G, Brinkmann R. RPE damage thresholds and mechanisms for laser exposure in the microsecond-to-millisecond time regimen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Feb;46(2):714-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0136.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15671304 (View on PubMed)

Mainster MA. Decreasing retinal photocoagulation damage: principles and techniques. Semin Ophthalmol. 1999 Dec;14(4):200-9. doi: 10.3109/08820539909069538.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10758220 (View on PubMed)

Al-Hussainy S, Dodson PM, Gibson JM. Pain response and follow-up of patients undergoing panretinal laser photocoagulation with reduced exposure times. Eye (Lond). 2008 Jan;22(1):96-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703026. Epub 2007 Nov 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18034195 (View on PubMed)

Nagpal M, Marlecha S, Nagpal K. Comparison of laser photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy using 532-nm standard laser versus multispot pattern scan laser. Retina. 2010 Mar;30(3):452-8. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c70127.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20216293 (View on PubMed)

Muqit MM, Marcellino GR, Gray JC, McLauchlan R, Henson DB, Young LB, Patton N, Charles SJ, Turner GS, Stanga PE. Pain responses of Pascal 20 ms multi-spot and 100 ms single-spot panretinal photocoagulation: Manchester Pascal Study, MAPASS report 2. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;94(11):1493-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.176677. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20558423 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0112S299

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.