Evaluating Community Health Centers' Adoption of a New Global Capitation Payment

NCT ID: NCT02637869

Last Updated: 2019-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

400000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2020-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators are conducting a prospective analysis of the Alternative Payment Methodology (APM) demonstration project sites. The investigators' goal is to conduct a cross project analysis of findings. The investigators propose to use mixed methods to study processes and outcomes associated with the APM natural experiment in payment reform. The investigators hypothesize that Community Health Centers (CHCs) participating in the APM demonstration project will redesign their workflows to better focus on patient and population health needs, resulting in reallocation of financial resources, lower overall costs, changes in utilization patterns, and improved quality.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Led by the Oregon Primary Care Association, three community health center (CHC) organizations in Oregon developed an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM). Under this APM pilot participating CHCs will receive a prospective payment system (PPS) payment as a capitated equivalent in a per-member-per-month rate for all of their Medicaid patients. Oregon CHC organizations (several clinic sites) implemented Phase I of this demonstration project on March 1, 2013; Phase II A was implemented on July 1, 2014; Phase II B on October 1, 2014; and Phase III began July 1, 2015.

We are a prospective analysis of the APM project sites. We propose to use mixed methods to study processes and outcomes associated with the APM natural experiment in payment reform. We hypothesize that CHCs participating in the APM demonstration project will redesign their workflows to better focus on patient and population health needs, resulting in reallocation of financial resources, lower overall costs, changes in utilization patterns, and improved quality.

The study will include baseline qualitative data collection as clinics are transitioning to the APM methodology. We will conduct 2 site visits to each intervention clinic to observe practice changes that occurred post APM-implementation (first visit approximately 12-18 months post-APM implementation; second visit approximately 30-36 months post-APM implementation). We will also assemble and analyze of pre-post quantitative and qualitative datasets, and interpretation and dissemination of study findings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group - non-intervention

Clinics that did not participate in the APM project

No interventions assigned to this group

Alternative Payment Model -intervention

Oregon developed an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM). Under this APM pilot participating CHCs will receive a prospective payment system (PPS) payment as a capitated equivalent in a per-member-per-month rate for all of their Medicaid patients

Alternative Payment Model

Intervention Type OTHER

Oregon developed an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM). Under this APM pilot participating CHCs will receive a prospective payment system (PPS) payment as a capitated equivalent in a per-member-per-month rate for all of their Medicaid patients

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alternative Payment Model

Oregon developed an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM). Under this APM pilot participating CHCs will receive a prospective payment system (PPS) payment as a capitated equivalent in a per-member-per-month rate for all of their Medicaid patients

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Total clinic population:

established patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
2. Medicaid Population:

Medicaid-enrolled patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64

Exclusion Criteria

1. Total clinic population:

non-established patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
2. Medicaid Population:

non-Medicaid-enrolled patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

OCHIN, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oregon Health and Science University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John Heintzman

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Heintzman, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oregon Health and Science University

Heather Angier, MPH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Oregon Health and Science University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Heintzman J, Cottrell E, Angier H, O'Malley J, Bailey S, Jacob L, DeVoe J, Ukhanova M, Thayer E, Marino M. Impact of Alternative Payment Methodology on Primary Care Visits and Scheduling. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):539-549. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180368.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31300574 (View on PubMed)

Angier H, O'Malley JP, Marino M, McConnell KJ, Cottrell E, Jacob RL, Likumahuwa-Ackman S, Heintzman J, Huguet N, Bailey SR, DeVoe JE. Evaluating community health centers' adoption of a new global capitation payment (eCHANGE) study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Jan;52:35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27836506 (View on PubMed)

Cottrell EK, Hall JD, Kautz G, Angier H, Likumahuwa-Ackman S, Sisulak L, Keller S, Cameron DC, DeVoe JE, Cohen DJ. Reporting From the Front Lines: Implementing Oregon's Alternative Payment Methodology in Federally Qualified Health Centers. J Ambul Care Manage. 2017 Oct/Dec;40(4):339-346. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000198.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28857887 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

71125

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AHRQ R01HS22651

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Genome Driven Primary Care Clinics - an RCT
NCT04781205 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA