Oncologists Satisfaction With Outcomes of Some Cytotoxic Agents

NCT ID: NCT02630979

Last Updated: 2017-03-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study measures the degree of oncology physician satisfaction with the outcomes of some cytotoxic agents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective observational questionnaire based study measuring the degree of satisfaction of medical oncologists with the results of some expensive cytotoxic agents. The study also measures the physician knowledge with the toxicity profile of the tested drugs, pharmaceutical perspectives, methods of administration, adherence to guidelines and the degree of bias of the physicians when prescribing this drugs.

The tested drugs are trastuzumab, lapatinib, sunitinib, m tor inhibitors, sorafenib, cetuximab, panitumumab, bevacizumab, erlotinib, rituximab, imatinib mesylate, gefitinib, abiraterone acetate, cabazitaxel, pertuzumab, fulvestrant, pemetrexate and crizotinib.

The evaluation will be through a predesigned questionnaire ( 30 questions ). The questions are divided into four categories measuring four items, the degree of physician satisfaction with the drugs results and toxicity profile, orientation with pharmaceutical perspectives of the drugs, adherence to guidelines and degree of bias with pharmaceutical companies complements. A predesigned questionnaire based scoring system will categorise the processed data to low, intermediate and high score for each of the four measured topics. The data will be processed and the degree of satisfaction, orientation with pharmaceutical perspectives, adherence to guidelines and degree of bias will be grade to low, moderate or high. Subsequent recommendations for cost effective analysis, physician education and strict auditing measures for drug prescription will be elaborated for the drugs.

NB: The study will be on two waves. The first wave will evaluate 9 drugs and the second wave will evaluate 8 drugs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physician Satisfaction With the Outcomes of Cytotoxic Drugs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No treatment

Clinical and medical oncology physicians.

Measuring satisfaction, knowledge and bias

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Questionnaire based assessment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Measuring satisfaction, knowledge and bias

Questionnaire based assessment.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Physicians ranked from senior resident to professional consultants

Exclusion Criteria

* Junior residents.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mahmoud Ellithy

Associate professor of clinical oncology. Ain Shams University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mahmoud Ellithy, Consultant

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of Medicine. Ain Shams University

Noha Salaheldin elbogdady, Pharmaciest

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Misr university

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medicine. AIn Shams University

Cairo, Elabbasia, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mahmoud Ellithy, Consultant

Role: CONTACT

01000069694 ext. 002

Lamiaa Elwakil, Pharmaciest

Role: CONTACT

01005201099

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mahmoud Ellithy, Consultant

Role: primary

01000069694 ext. 002

Lamiaa Elwakil, Pharmaciest

Role: backup

01005201099 ext. 002

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Cure and more1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Improving Care After Chemotherapy
NCT01944137 COMPLETED NA
Psychoeducational Program for Cancer Patients.
NCT06175195 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Oncotool for Cancer Medications
NCT03952312 COMPLETED NA