A Study to Determine the Feasibility and Acceptability of Conducting a Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy With Surgery in paTients With Peripheral Stage I nOn-small Cell Lung Cancer cOnsidered Higher Risk of Complications From Surgical Resection

NCT ID: NCT02629458

Last Updated: 2019-07-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-01

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is curable and surgery is considered the standard of care for fit, good performance status patients. However, a high proportion of patients with stage 1 NSCLC are elderly and/or have medical co-morbidities and are therefore at higher risk of surgical complications. The optimal treatment for these patients is unknown. SABR may be an equally appropriate treatment but this need to be formally assessed. Funded by the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit, SABRtooth is a UK multi-centre, two-group individually randomised controlled feasibility study of patients with peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer considered at higher risk from surgery. In total, 54 patients are planned to be recruited from 4 treatment sites and 2 referral sites. This study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of performing a largescale definitive randomised phase III trial comparing surgery with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). The qualitative substudy is an exploration of the reasons for nonparticipation in the SABRTooth trial. As the two treatments are very different, patients may have a strong preference for either surgery or SABR, or may feel uncomfortable to have a decision between such distinct options taken out of their hands. Understanding why patients choose not to participate or do not take up their treatment allocation will be crucial in demonstrating that recruiting to a larger scale phase III trial is feasible. We will explore what patients, who have declined particpation in the study or who intiailly consented but subsequently fail to take up their randomimsed treatment arm, understand, perceive and feel about, how the SABRTooth trial was presented to them and their expectations of study burden.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oncology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients requiring surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment by Surgical resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treatment by Surgical resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Primary tumour characteristics.
2. Peripherally located tumour as defined in the RTOG 0236 study and UK SABR Consortium guidelines. This states that the tumour must be more than 2cm in axial diameter from a major airway.

* This includes the trachea, carina, right and left main bronchus and extends to the bifurcation of the right upper, right middle, right lower, left upper and left lower lobe bronchioles
3. No evidence of hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes involvement.

* Any hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes that are either
* PET positive or \>1cm in axial dimension must be sampled by mediastinoscopy, endobronchial ultrasound or oesophageal endoscopic ultrasound and demonstrate negative cytology and/or pathology
4. Local lung cancer MDT consensus opinion that patient is considered suitable for either surgical resection or SABR treatment AND also to be at higher risk complications from surgical resection
5. Age ≥ 18
6. Female patients must satisfy the investigator that they are not pregnant (negative pregnancy test within 72hrs of surgery of day 1 surgery/SABR), or are not of childbearing potential
7. Able and willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous radiotherapy within the planned treatment volume.
2. History of clinically significant diffuse interstitial lung disease
3. Any history of concurrent or previous invasive malignancy that in the opinion of the investigator could impact on trial outcomes
4. Clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic spread
5. History of psychiatric or addictive disorder or other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the trial requirements
6. Previous systemic therapies, including targeted and experimental treatments, for their current lung cancer diagnosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elbanna M, Shiue K, Edwards D, Cerra-Franco A, Agrawal N, Hinton J, Mereniuk T, Huang C, Ryan JL, Smith J, Aaron VD, Burney H, Zang Y, Holmes J, Langer M, Zellars R, Lautenschlaeger T. Impact of Lung Parenchymal-Only Failure on Overall Survival in Early-Stage Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer. 2021 May;22(3):e342-e359. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32736936 (View on PubMed)

Franks KN, McParland L, Webster J, Baldwin DR, Sebag-Montefiore D, Evison M, Booton R, Faivre-Finn C, Naidu B, Ferguson J, Peedell C, Callister MEJ, Kennedy M, Hewison J, Bestall J, Gregory WM, Hall P, Collinson F, Olivier C, Naylor R, Bell S, Allen P, Sloss A, Snee M. SABRTooth: a randomised controlled feasibility study of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with surgery in patients with peripheral stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer considered to be at higher risk of complications from surgical resection. Eur Respir J. 2020 Nov 12;56(5):2000118. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00118-2020. Print 2020 Nov.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32616595 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MO14/11248

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.