Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy Compared With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With High-Risk Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01336894
Last Updated: 2017-05-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
13 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-05-31
2017-03-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well surgery with or without internal radiation therapy works compared with stereotactic body radiation therapy in treating patients with high-risk stage IA or stage IB non-small cell lung cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00750269
Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00960999
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I or Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Can Be Removed By Surgery
NCT00551369
Radiation in Stage I or Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
NCT00346320
Single Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy After Surgery in Treating Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT04073745
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* To ascertain whether patients treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate that is no more than 10% less than patients treated with sublobar resection (SR).
Secondary
* To compare loco-regional recurrence-free survival between study arms.
* To compare disease-free survival between study arms.
* To compare grade 3 or higher specific adverse event profiles between study arms at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-therapy.
* To compare pulmonary function between patients treated with SBRT and patients treated with SR.
* To compare the adverse events and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in each arm for patients with low or high Charlson comorbidity index scores, including a test interaction between Charlson comorbidity index scores (low vs high) and treatment arm.
Tertiary
* To compare the quality-adjusted survival between the SBRT and SR treatments in terms of time to death (primary) and time until recurrence (secondary).
* To examine whether pre-operative and post-operative clinically significant deficits in previously identified prognostic PRO domains (overall quality of life \[QOL\], fatigue, anxiety, and dyspnea) are associated with shorter patient survival in this patient population and to compare the relative effectiveness of each treatment (SBRT and SR).
* To contribute to an ACOSOG bank of normative data in order to improve short/long-term outcomes of cancer patients by identifying patients experiencing clinically significant deficits in patient-reported outcomes and the relationship to genetic variables.
* To explore whether blood-based biomarkers, including osteopontins, will be able to predict which patients will be at high risk for recurrence by treatment with either SBRT or SR. (exploratory)
* To explore whether blood-based biomarkers, including TGF-β1, will be able to predict which patients will be at high risk for pulmonary complications by treatment with either SBRT or SR. (exploratory)
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to planned brachytherapy (yes vs no) and ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm I: Patients undergo sublobar resection comprising either a wedge resection or anatomical segmentectomy with or without intraoperative brachytherapy\* comprising an iodine I 125 implant at the resection margin.
* Arm II: Patients undergo 3 fractions of stereotactic body radiation therapy at 2-8 days apart.
NOTE: \*Patients may receive brachytherapy at the discretion of treating physician.
Patients may undergo blood sample collection at baseline and periodically during study for correlative studies. Tumor tissue samples may also be collected from patients who undergo resection.
Patients complete the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA), and the UCDS Shortness of Breath quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and periodically during study and follow-up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 30 days, every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 1 year, and then yearly for 2 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (SR+Brachytherapy)
Patients undergo sublobar resection comprising either a wedge resection or anatomical segmentectomy with or without intraoperative brachytherapy comprising an iodine I 125 implant at the resection margin.
therapeutic conventional surgery
Undergo surgery
iodine I 125
Undergo seed implant radiotherapy
Arm II (SBRT)
Patients undergo 3 fractions of stereotactic body radiation therapy at 2-8 days apart.
stereotactic body radiation therapy
Undergo radiotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
therapeutic conventional surgery
Undergo surgery
iodine I 125
Undergo seed implant radiotherapy
stereotactic body radiation therapy
Undergo radiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* ECOG performance status (PS) 0, 1, or 2
* Patient at high-risk for surgery by meeting a minimum of one major criteria or two minor criteria as described below:
* Major criteria
* FEV1 ≤ 50% predicted
* DLCO ≤ 50% predicted
* Minor criteria
* Age ≥ 75 years
* FEV1 51-60% predicted
* DLCO 51-60% predicted
* Pulmonary hypertension (defined as a pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than 40 mm Hg) as estimated by echocardiography or right heart catheterization
* Poor left ventricular function (defined as an ejection fraction of 40% or less)
* Resting or exercise arterial pO2 ≤ 55 mm Hg or SpO2 ≤ 88%
* pCO2 \> 45 mm Hg
* Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) Dyspnea Scale ≥ 3
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative urine or serum pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* No prior invasive malignancy, unless disease-free for ≥ 3 years prior to registration (except non-melanoma skin cancer, in-situ cancers).
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* No prior intra-thoracic radiotherapy
* Prior radiotherapy as part of treatment for head and neck, breast, or other non-thoracic cancer is permitted
* Prior chemotherapy or surgical resection for the lung cancer being treated on this protocol is NOT permitted
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hiran C. Fernando, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Mayo Clinic Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
University of California Davis Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, United States
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, United States
Stanford Cancer Center
Stanford, California, United States
Baptist Cancer Institute - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at Orlando
Orlando, Florida, United States
Emory Crawford Long Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Curtis and Elizabeth Anderson Cancer Institute at Memorial Health University Medical Center
Savannah, Georgia, United States
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
OSF St. Francis Medical Center
Peoria, Illinois, United States
Lucille P. Markey Cancer Center at University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
James Graham Brown Cancer Center at University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
DeCesaris Cancer Institute at Anne Arundel Medical Center
Annapolis, Maryland, United States
Greenebaum Cancer Center at University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
St. Agnes Hospital Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Tufts Medical Center Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Boston University Cancer Research Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak Campus
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Valley Hospital - Ridgewood
Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States
St. Luke's - Roosevelt Hospital Center - St.Luke's Division
New York, New York, United States
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, United States
Stony Brook University Cancer Center
Stony Brook, New York, United States
SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital
Syracuse, New York, United States
Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Charles M. Barrett Cancer Center at University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Providence Cancer Center at Providence Portland Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, United States
Geisinger Cancer Institute at Geisinger Health
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
York Cancer Center at Apple Hill Medical Center
York, Pennsylvania, United States
Hollings Cancer Center at Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Baylor University Medical Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Virginia Cancer Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Sentara Cancer Institute at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Providence Regional Cancer Partnership
Everett, Washington, United States
Swedish Cancer Institute at Swedish Medical Center - First Hill Campus
Seattle, Washington, United States
Gundersen Lutheran Center for Cancer and Blood
La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Milwaukee
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Waukesha Memorial Hospital Regional Cancer Center
Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States
London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fernando HC, Timmerman R. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4099/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1021: a randomized study of sublobar resection compared with stereotactic body radiotherapy for high-risk stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):S35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2011-02667
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000698986
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Z4099
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.