Effects of Cervical Manipulation and Mobilization on Salivary Cortisol Concentrations

NCT ID: NCT02628470

Last Updated: 2017-04-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Currently, there are many studies about the effects of manual therapy on pain, but there are not enough studies to know what are the mechanisms that cause these effects.

Although there is a research measuring neuromodulators substances after a cervical and dorsal manipulation, it has been done in healthy subjects and there is no information about mobilization. This work aims to select a sample with chronic neck pain, incorporating the cervical mobilization as a therapeutic approach to compare the effects of both techniques because not all patients accept the manipulation as a treatment technique (mobilization is much better tolerated) and to verify that the liberation of cortisol is not just caused by the stress on the joint manipulation and the psychological stress and expectation may be important.

The hypothesis of this paper is that cervical manipulation and mobilization in subjects with chronic neck pain there will increase salivary cortisol levels.

It is also expected a little increase in the expectation of being manipulated group because of the psychological stress.

It is expected an improvement in the neck disability, pain and range of motion in the intervention groups immediately after and in the three groups the following week after the exercise.

The main objective of the study is to measure and analyze changes in salivary cortisol concentrations after the intervention in the three groups. Secondary objectives is to analyze the changes in range of motion and disability caused by neck pain neck pain level

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

STUDY DESIGN:

Experimental study using a randomized controlled trial with blinded evaluator with three parallel groups, two experimental and one placebo.

INTERVENTION

1. Experimental group cervical manipulation:

The patient is supine without a pillow and physiotherapist standing in the ipsilateral corner of the hand of the thrust. If the segment to manipulate is the upper cervical spine, the radial aspect of the distal phalanx of the index finger of the pulse is placed on the posterolateral aspect of the transverse process of the atlas (In medium or low segments of cervical spine on the vertebra on which we want to make the thrust). The thumb rests on the zygomatic arch and the other fingers rest on the back of the skull, leaving the forearm perpendicular to the neck. In middle or lower cervical spine, the thumb rests on the angle of the jaw and the other fingers on the back of the neck.

The contralateral hand rests against the contralateral side of the patient's skull with the fingers facing caudally, so we left ear between the index and middle fingers.

To take the patient to the end of range of motion will be added ipsilateral inclination and contralateral rotation without exceeding the 30-40 °.

There will be a contralateral displacement of the head and a posteroanterior glide to take the patient to energizing. The impulse is made in pure contralateral rotation.
2. Experimental Group of cervical posterior-anterior mobilization in the most painful segment:

Maitland described by the patient is prone with his forehead in the palms. The thumb rests on the articular pillar (on the transverse blade) and the other fingers around the neck to stabilize the soft tissue.

The limit pressure will be that cause pain to the patient. The oscillatory motion is produced by the arms and the body while the hands remain stable with a pressure distributed uniformly around the patient's neck. It is important that the neck and hands move as a unit. high-amplitude technique may be performed by raising the patient's neck with the pads of the fingers This technique was performed for 3 minutes remaining below the pain threshold of the patient.
3. Placebo group:

The subjects of this group will expect a cervical manipulation to check the psychological component has an effect on cortisol segregation. It will proceed with the same protocol as in the group of cervical manipulation, but without joint stress or thrust.

Participants will receive a protocol of domiciliary cervical control exercises adapted to each subject for deep cervical muscles after taking the second salivary sample.

Seasonal timing will be considered (evaluating the subjects in the same month), circadian rhythms (evaluating subjects mid-morning to avoid peak morning cortisol) and periods of the menstrual cycle as they are factors that can determine the results. In the case of the menstrual cycle they are cited the seventh day of the cycle.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group cervical manipulation

The patient is supine without a pillow and physiotherapist standing in the ipsilateral corner of the hand of the thrust.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cervical manipulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

cervical high-velocity low-amplitude thrust manipulation

Placebo group

Participants will receive a protocol of domiciliary cervical control exercises.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

cervical control exercises

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Exercises of flexion, extension and rotation of the cervical spine

Group cervical mobilization

Oscillatory mobilization technique. With the patient in prone, the investigator applies an oscillatory motion in the most painful cervical segment for three minutes

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oscillatory mobilization technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Joint mobilization technique type III according Maitland

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cervical manipulation

cervical high-velocity low-amplitude thrust manipulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

cervical control exercises

Exercises of flexion, extension and rotation of the cervical spine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Oscillatory mobilization technique

Joint mobilization technique type III according Maitland

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Manifest mechanical pain in the neck to the T1 vertebra as lower limit
* Present the medical diagnosis of mechanical neck pain
* Do not be getting any kind of hormonal therapy (including oral contraceptives)
* Be over 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects that are associated with the adrenal gland pathology
* Pathologies excess or defect of cortisol
* Pathology severe psychological disorders related to anxiety, mood or stress
* Participants pregnant due to changes in hormonal determinations
* Contraindication to manipulation or mobilization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Valera-Calero JA; Plaza-Manzano G; Gallego-Izquierdo T

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alcala

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Dr. Daniel Pecos Martín

Dr. Pecos-Martin, D

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tomás Gallego-Izquierdo, Dr

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Alcalá University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alcalá Universuty

Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEI/HU/2015/10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.