Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
NA
366 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-06-30
2024-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Merits of Performing a Modified Template Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection
NCT00751140
Nephroureterectomy With and Without Lymph Node Dissection for Upper Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma
NCT06262516
Analysis of Predictive Factors for Urinary Leakage After Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Hilum Tumors
NCT06916910
Safe D3 Right Hemicolectomy for Cancer Through Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Angio
NCT01351714
Patient Reported Outcome After Nephron Sparing Treatment of Small Renal Tumours
NCT04040530
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Two out of three tumours in the upper urinary tract are located in the renal pelvis. Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is probably more common among tumours in the upper urinary tract compared to tumours in the urinary bladder. Thus, muscle-invasive tumours represent approximately 45 % of renal pelvic tumours compared to 25 % of tumours within the urinary bladder. As in the bladder, lymph node metastases are rare in non-muscle invasive disease. Information regarding indications, extent and possible curative potential is currently lacking for lymphadenectomy in conjunction with nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract (UUTUC). There are, however, retrospective series with survival data for patients with lymph node metastasis that report long term survival after surgery as monotherapy with similar survival proportions as in bladder cancer with lymph node metastases after radical cystectomy. A retrospective study from Tokyo was expanded to the only available prospective study, where 68 patients with UUTUC were submitted to template-based lymphadenectomy. Another retrospective study by the same Japanese group, showed that 5-year cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in the complete lymphadenectomy group than in the incomplete lymphadenectomy or without lymphadenectomy groups. Tanaka N et al. reported recurrence rate after nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy at 1 and 3 years were 18.9 and 29.8 %, respectively.
Hypothesis: Complete lymphadenectomy during nephroureterectomy because of invasive urothelial carcinoma may reduce the incidence of lymph nodes metastasis, local recurrence, distant metastasis and improve the cancer survival rate.
Purpose: To evaluate the influence of complete lymphadenectomy on recurrence and cancer specific survival rate compared to limited or no lymphadenectomy.
Primary endpoint/analysis: Recurrence free survival at five-year postoperative. Secondary endpoints: Incidence of lymph node metastases, local recurrence and/or distant metastasis, cancer specific and overall survival at one, three and five-year postoperative. Complications rate according to Clavien classification within the first thirty days postoperatively.
Another endpoint/analysis: Multivariate analysis of possible preoperative risk factors for lymph node metastases (tumour size, preoperative urinary cytology, lymph node enlargement on CT, PET-CT positivity) and postoperative risk factors for lymph node metastases (stage, grade, tumour diameter, presence of necrosis in the tumour (none; \<10%; \>10% of total tumour area), number of lymph nodes excised).
Design: Prospectively randomized to template based lymphadenectomy or not, in patients with clinically muscle-invasive UUTUC in the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter. One to one, controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups, 183 patients in each group. Group A will be scheduled to receive routine standard open or robot assisted nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy except for clinically enlarged. Group B will be scheduled to received mapped lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nephroureterektomy
scheduled to receive routine standard open or robot assisted nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy
Nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy
Removing the kidney, ureter and bladder cuff
Nephroureterektomy + Lymphadenectomy
scheduled to received mapped lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy
Lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy
Lymphadenectomy (intervention group only):
Lymphadenectomy performs in four fractions on the right side and two fractions on the left side according to Dissection template (Appendix 1). Renal hilar nodes are included in fraction 1 and 3, respectively.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy
Lymphadenectomy (intervention group only):
Lymphadenectomy performs in four fractions on the right side and two fractions on the left side according to Dissection template (Appendix 1). Renal hilar nodes are included in fraction 1 and 3, respectively.
Nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy
Removing the kidney, ureter and bladder cuff
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Locally advanced high grade urothelial carcinoma in the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter (Clinical stage \> T1)
3. Patient with ECOG performance score of 2 and less.
4. Able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma for the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter
3. Inability to understand written consent forms or give consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zealand University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nessn Azawi
Urologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nessn H Azawi, MB.Ch.B.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Roskilde University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Roskilde Hospital
Roskilde, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Holmang S, Johansson SL. Bilateral metachronous ureteral and renal pelvic carcinomas: incidence, clinical presentation, histopathology, treatment and outcome. J Urol. 2006 Jan;175(1):69-72; discussion 72-3. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00057-1.
Hall MC, Womack S, Sagalowsky AI, Carmody T, Erickstad MD, Roehrborn CG. Prognostic factors, recurrence, and survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a 30-year experience in 252 patients. Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):594-601. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00295-7.
Olgac S, Mazumdar M, Dalbagni G, Reuter VE. Urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a clinicopathologic study of 130 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Dec;28(12):1545-52. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200412000-00001.
Lughezzani G, Jeldres C, Isbarn H, Shariat SF, Sun M, Pharand D, Widmer H, Arjane P, Graefen M, Montorsi F, Perrotte P, Karakiewicz PI. A critical appraisal of the value of lymph node dissection at nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1296. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
Kondo T, Nakazawa H, Ito F, Hashimoto Y, Toma H, Tanabe K. Primary site and incidence of lymph node metastases in urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract. Urology. 2007 Feb;69(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.014.
Kondo T, Hara I, Takagi T, Kodama Y, Hashimoto Y, Kobayashi H, Iizuka J, Omae K, Ikezawa E, Yoshida K, Tanabe K. Possible role of template-based lymphadenectomy in reducing the risk of regional node recurrence after nephroureterectomy in patients with renal pelvic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec;44(12):1233-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyu151. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
Tanaka N, Kikuchi E, Kanao K, Matsumoto K, Kobayashi H, Ide H, Miyazaki Y, Obata J, Hoshino K, Shirotake S, Akita H, Kosaka T, Miyajima A, Momma T, Nakagawa K, Hasegawa S, Nakajima Y, Jinzaki M, Oya M. Metastatic behavior of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: association with primary tumor location. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;21(3):1038-45. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3349-z. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REG-79-2015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.