Lymphadenectomy in Urothelial Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT02607709

Last Updated: 2024-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

366 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-30

Study Completion Date

2024-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Two out of three tumours in the upper urinary tract are located in the renal pelvis. Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is probably more common among tumours in the upper urinary tract compared to tumours in the urinary bladder. Thus, muscle-invasive tumours represent approximately 45 % of renal pelvic tumours compared to 25 % of tumours within the urinary bladder. As in the bladder, lymph node metastases are rare in non-muscle invasive disease. Information regarding indications, extent and possible curative potential is currently lacking for lymphadenectomy in conjunction with nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract (UUTUC). There are, however, retrospective series with survival data for patients with lymph node metastasis that report long term survival after surgery as monotherapy \[4\] with similar survival proportions as in bladder cancer with lymph node metastases after radical cystectomy. A retrospective study from Tokyo was expanded to the only available prospective study, where 68 patients with UUTUC were submitted to template-based lymphadenectomy. Another retrospective study by the same Japanese group, showed that 5-year cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in the complete lymphadenectomy group than in the incomplete lymphadenectomy or without lymphadenectomy groups. Tanaka N et al. reported recurrence rate after nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy at 1 and 3 years were 18.9 and 29.8 %, respectively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Two out of three tumours in the upper urinary tract are located in the renal pelvis. Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is probably more common among tumours in the upper urinary tract compared to tumours in the urinary bladder. Thus, muscle-invasive tumours represent approximately 45 % of renal pelvic tumours compared to 25 % of tumours within the urinary bladder. As in the bladder, lymph node metastases are rare in non-muscle invasive disease. Information regarding indications, extent and possible curative potential is currently lacking for lymphadenectomy in conjunction with nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract (UUTUC). There are, however, retrospective series with survival data for patients with lymph node metastasis that report long term survival after surgery as monotherapy with similar survival proportions as in bladder cancer with lymph node metastases after radical cystectomy. A retrospective study from Tokyo was expanded to the only available prospective study, where 68 patients with UUTUC were submitted to template-based lymphadenectomy. Another retrospective study by the same Japanese group, showed that 5-year cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in the complete lymphadenectomy group than in the incomplete lymphadenectomy or without lymphadenectomy groups. Tanaka N et al. reported recurrence rate after nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy at 1 and 3 years were 18.9 and 29.8 %, respectively.

Hypothesis: Complete lymphadenectomy during nephroureterectomy because of invasive urothelial carcinoma may reduce the incidence of lymph nodes metastasis, local recurrence, distant metastasis and improve the cancer survival rate.

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of complete lymphadenectomy on recurrence and cancer specific survival rate compared to limited or no lymphadenectomy.

Primary endpoint/analysis: Recurrence free survival at five-year postoperative. Secondary endpoints: Incidence of lymph node metastases, local recurrence and/or distant metastasis, cancer specific and overall survival at one, three and five-year postoperative. Complications rate according to Clavien classification within the first thirty days postoperatively.

Another endpoint/analysis: Multivariate analysis of possible preoperative risk factors for lymph node metastases (tumour size, preoperative urinary cytology, lymph node enlargement on CT, PET-CT positivity) and postoperative risk factors for lymph node metastases (stage, grade, tumour diameter, presence of necrosis in the tumour (none; \<10%; \>10% of total tumour area), number of lymph nodes excised).

Design: Prospectively randomized to template based lymphadenectomy or not, in patients with clinically muscle-invasive UUTUC in the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter. One to one, controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups, 183 patients in each group. Group A will be scheduled to receive routine standard open or robot assisted nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy except for clinically enlarged. Group B will be scheduled to received mapped lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ureteral Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nephroureterektomy

scheduled to receive routine standard open or robot assisted nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Removing the kidney, ureter and bladder cuff

Nephroureterektomy + Lymphadenectomy

scheduled to received mapped lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lymphadenectomy (intervention group only):

Lymphadenectomy performs in four fractions on the right side and two fractions on the left side according to Dissection template (Appendix 1). Renal hilar nodes are included in fraction 1 and 3, respectively.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy

Lymphadenectomy (intervention group only):

Lymphadenectomy performs in four fractions on the right side and two fractions on the left side according to Dissection template (Appendix 1). Renal hilar nodes are included in fraction 1 and 3, respectively.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy

Removing the kidney, ureter and bladder cuff

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age above 18 years
2. Locally advanced high grade urothelial carcinoma in the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter (Clinical stage \> T1)
3. Patient with ECOG performance score of 2 and less.
4. Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Clinical suspicion of non-muscle invasive UUTUC
2. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma for the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter
3. Inability to understand written consent forms or give consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zealand University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nessn Azawi

Urologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nessn H Azawi, MB.Ch.B.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Roskilde University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Roskilde Hospital

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Holmang S, Johansson SL. Bilateral metachronous ureteral and renal pelvic carcinomas: incidence, clinical presentation, histopathology, treatment and outcome. J Urol. 2006 Jan;175(1):69-72; discussion 72-3. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00057-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16406872 (View on PubMed)

Hall MC, Womack S, Sagalowsky AI, Carmody T, Erickstad MD, Roehrborn CG. Prognostic factors, recurrence, and survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a 30-year experience in 252 patients. Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):594-601. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00295-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9763077 (View on PubMed)

Olgac S, Mazumdar M, Dalbagni G, Reuter VE. Urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a clinicopathologic study of 130 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Dec;28(12):1545-52. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200412000-00001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15577672 (View on PubMed)

Lughezzani G, Jeldres C, Isbarn H, Shariat SF, Sun M, Pharand D, Widmer H, Arjane P, Graefen M, Montorsi F, Perrotte P, Karakiewicz PI. A critical appraisal of the value of lymph node dissection at nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1296. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19864000 (View on PubMed)

Kondo T, Nakazawa H, Ito F, Hashimoto Y, Toma H, Tanabe K. Primary site and incidence of lymph node metastases in urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract. Urology. 2007 Feb;69(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17320661 (View on PubMed)

Kondo T, Hara I, Takagi T, Kodama Y, Hashimoto Y, Kobayashi H, Iizuka J, Omae K, Ikezawa E, Yoshida K, Tanabe K. Possible role of template-based lymphadenectomy in reducing the risk of regional node recurrence after nephroureterectomy in patients with renal pelvic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec;44(12):1233-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyu151. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25271269 (View on PubMed)

Tanaka N, Kikuchi E, Kanao K, Matsumoto K, Kobayashi H, Ide H, Miyazaki Y, Obata J, Hoshino K, Shirotake S, Akita H, Kosaka T, Miyajima A, Momma T, Nakagawa K, Hasegawa S, Nakajima Y, Jinzaki M, Oya M. Metastatic behavior of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: association with primary tumor location. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;21(3):1038-45. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3349-z. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24217788 (View on PubMed)

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15273542 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REG-79-2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Symptomatic and Incidental RCC Detection
NCT07004426 NOT_YET_RECRUITING