Kinesio Taping Efficacy in Chronic Low Back Pain Treatment (KITALO)
NCT ID: NCT02604290
Last Updated: 2019-04-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
61 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-15
2016-11-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Kinesio Taping on Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
NCT02550457
Effects of Core Exercise in Low Back Pain
NCT05544890
Myofascial Release and Kinesio Taping on Autonomic Nervous System in Low Back Pain
NCT02067494
Effectiveness of Electrical Stimulation or Kinesio Taping on Recovery Disability in Low Back Pain
NCT02812459
Evaluation on the Effects of Two Rehabilitation Treatment and Tape for Functional and Motor Recovery of LBP Patients
NCT05419310
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective:
* Primary objective: To evaluate kinesio taping method effectiveness at short term (1 month) and medium term (6 months) - pain, disability and quality of live - in patients with chronic low back pain.
* Secondary objective: To analyze the influence of fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophizing ideas and anxiety-depression presence in kinesio taping method effectiveness for chronic low back pain patients.
Method:
Chronic low back pain patients are recruited from the outpatient rehabilitation service of a health area of Valencia which serves a population of 320,000 inhabitants.
The study has been planned for a difference of 3 points in the Roland Morris questionnaire, as these values have been recognized as clinically relevant . Considering an alpha of 0.05 and beta of 0.9 for comparison of means of two tails , 24 patients per group is the required sample size to detect changes in disability. Considering a loss of 20 % of the participants, the study sample is set to 62 patients.
Addressing the CONSORT guidelines, a flow chart describing the situation during the course of the trial is draw; including all patients invited , the number of those who refuse to participate before randomization , the assignment to each treatment arm, losses during follow-up and possible crosslinking.
Patients who agree to participate in the study are randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups. The allocation was made by a list generated by computer using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 19), supervised by an statistical outside of the investigator team . Concealment of randomization sequence is maintained with hidden cards in numbered opaque envelopes.
The duration of treatment is 4 weeks , changing the tape with a weekly frequency. Basic rules of postural control and stabilization and the pattern of exercises proposed by the Spanish Society for Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine are given prior to randomization.
The evaluation of results is done through self-administered questionnaires to be completed by the patients ever before clinic visits .
The primary results will be obtained by intention to treat analysis. Descriptive statistics will be obtained expressing continuous variables in mean (standard deviation) or median (quartiles) according to their normal or not, categorical variables in number (percentage) and expressing in all cases the confidence interval of 95%. The normal distribution was checked by Kolmogorov test to determine the use of parametric or non-parametric tests. For comparison of continuous variables between groups the Student t test or the Mann-Whitney test will be used according to the type of distribution. For comparison of categorical variables the chi-square test or Fisher will be used test according to the type of distribution. Changes in intra-group in continued variables at 4 weeks and 6 months will be analyzed with the Student t test for paired samples variables. To assess whether there are differences between the two groups in pain, disability and different variables analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be held, one for each dependent variable. In all tests, the independent variable is the group, while the covariate variable will be the baseline for each dependent variable. It will be necessary to have comparable levels in both groups to correctly interpret the results of ANCOVA. Therefore, several Student t tests, one for each dependent variable considering each group as an independent variable in each case, will be made. To assess whether changes in the 2 groups are produced differently, multiple ANOVA analysis for each dependent variable will be performed. In all cases, the independent variable is the group and the time data are collected. This analysis examines only the possible presence of interactions. In addition, correlations between the study variables will be evaluated, using Pearson's r or Rho Spearman according to the type of distribution. Two models of multiple linear regression will be applied with pain and disability as dependent variables and age, sex, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance, sick leave, time to progression, anxiety-depression as independent variables.
The project will follow existing in Spain and the European Union guidelines for the protection of patients in clinical trials with respect to collection, storage and custody of personal data.
All eligible patients are given oral and written information ( informed consent) about the study and the two treatment modalities. Specifically they are informed about they can leave the study at any time without giving any explanation and that this decision will not affect the continuation of his regular treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Kinesio Taping method
The tape is applied depending on the physical examination:
* Muscular technique is placed along paravertebral muscles if back pain in flexion or extension improves when skin/fascial mobilisation is applied in the direction of paravertebral muscle fibers; the base is placed up or down if the mobilisation direction is up or down respectively.
* Space technique is placed horizontally over the painful spinal segmental level if back pain in flexion or extension improves when skin/fascial mobilisation is applied approaching to a central point.
* Fascia technique is placed horizontally over the painful area in paravertebral muscles if back pain in flexion or extension improves when skin/fascial mobilisation is applied transverse to the paravertebral muscle fibers.
Kinesio Taping method
The tape is applied depending on the physical examination:
* Muscular technique is placed along paravertebral muscles if back pain in flexion or extension improves when skin/fascial mobilisation is applied in the direction of paravertebral muscle fibers; the base is placed up or down if the mobilisation direction is up or down respectively.
* Space technique is placed horizontally over the painful spinal segmental level if back pain in flexion or extension improves when skin/fascial mobilisation is applied approaching to a central point.
* Fascia technique is placed horizontally over the painful area in paravertebral muscles if back pain in flexion or extension improves when skin/fascial mobilisation is applied transverse to the paravertebral muscle fibers.
Kinesio Taping sham
The tape is applied with 0% tension, horizontally over two non-tender to palpation spinal segmental levels. The patient is kept in neutral position.
Kinesio Taping sham
The tape is applied with 0% tension, horizontally over two non-tender to palpation spinal segmental levels. The patient is kept in neutral position.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Kinesio Taping method
The tape is applied depending on the physical examination:
* Muscular technique is placed along paravertebral muscles if back pain in flexion or extension improves when skin/fascial mobilisation is applied in the direction of paravertebral muscle fibers; the base is placed up or down if the mobilisation direction is up or down respectively.
* Space technique is placed horizontally over the painful spinal segmental level if back pain in flexion or extension improves when skin/fascial mobilisation is applied approaching to a central point.
* Fascia technique is placed horizontally over the painful area in paravertebral muscles if back pain in flexion or extension improves when skin/fascial mobilisation is applied transverse to the paravertebral muscle fibers.
Kinesio Taping sham
The tape is applied with 0% tension, horizontally over two non-tender to palpation spinal segmental levels. The patient is kept in neutral position.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Chronic low back pain least 6 months duration.
* Improvement of pain with mobilization of skin/fascias in physical examination.
* Signature of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of components of neuropathic pain (radiculopathy, lumbar canal stenosis).
* Specific origin pain (vertebral fracture, tumor or nerve column structures, spondyloarthropathy, spondylodiscitis).
* Prior spine surgery.
* Mental retardation, severe mental illness, substance abuse or dependency, illiteracy.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cardenal Herrera University
OTHER
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
OTHER
Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Julio Domenech
MD-PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
María Lourdes Peñalver Barrios, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
Julio Domenech Fernández, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
Juan Francisco Lisón Párraga, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cardenal Herrera CEU University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kent P, Mjosund HL, Petersen DH. Does targeting manual therapy and/or exercise improve patient outcomes in nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review. BMC Med. 2010 Apr 8;8:22. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-22.
Parreira Pdo C, Costa Lda C, Hespanhol LC Jr, Lopes AD, Costa LO. Current evidence does not support the use of Kinesio Taping in clinical practice: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2014 Mar;60(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
Paoloni M, Bernetti A, Fratocchi G, Mangone M, Parrinello L, Del Pilar Cooper M, Sesto L, Di Sante L, Santilli V. Kinesio Taping applied to lumbar muscles influences clinical and electromyographic characteristics in chronic low back pain patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):237-44. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
Castro-Sanchez AM, Lara-Palomo IC, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Sanchez-Labraca N, Arroyo-Morales M. Kinesio Taping reduces disability and pain slightly in chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2012;58(2):89-95. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(12)70088-7.
Kachanathu SJ, Alenazi AM, Seif HE, Hafez AR, Alroumim MA. Comparison between Kinesio Taping and a Traditional Physical Therapy Program in Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1185-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1185. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
Parreira Pdo C, Costa Lda C, Takahashi R, Hespanhol Junior LC, Luz Junior MA, Silva TM, Costa LO. Kinesio taping to generate skin convolutions is not better than sham taping for people with chronic non-speci fi c low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2014 Jun;60(2):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MSK063
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.